Jump to content

Darnok

Members
  • Content Count

    1,266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

486 Excellent

About Darnok

  • Rank
    Rocket Scientist

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You must be new in here, if you play KSP long enough your brain can render code into 3D model.
  2. Probably Kerbal creator where you would be able to customize your own crew space suits, name etc etc...
  3. Some planes for BD armory... A-10 like Tau-6 AF I Tau-6 VAF II (vtol)
  4. Tau MAV (Medium Armored Vehicle) basic chasis parts: 36 mass: depends how much fuel is loaded On this basic chasis I've built few low parts vehicles:
  5. Kerbals: More "jobs" for Kerbals would be nice, we could have some procedurally generated objects, little different for each biome, on planets and few interactions with them... like study, break, take sample, put into goo container, push, pull, lift, carve Jeb face in stone etc etc. Ability to eject from plane cockpits... with parachute of course Add some Kerbal sized scanners, so we could search and study things, of course those should have finite batteries, not like helmet lights. While in EVA we could have futuristic UI for Kerbal life signs heart beat, oxygen, maybe some d
  6. And? Your way of thinking is flawed by united humanity propaganda. Why nobody is saying "we discovered America"? We are saying "Christopher Columbus discovered America", but he didn't done that alone. He didn't spend his own money to get there, he had crew, he had informations from other sailors and travellers about "how to reach India". Yet nobody is saying it was achievement made by entire humanity... because it was done long before united humanity propaganda started and this achievement is labelled correctly. While newer achievements are labelled as "ours", I am not fan of U
  7. They wouldn't have reason to start space race... and that is why united humanity didn't go further than USA in space exploration, because there was no reason to push this technology further.
  8. Anyone wants to buy satellite? http://satrevolution.com/en
  9. I am not saying it didn't happen, I am saying I suspect it didn't happen in exact way official version tells us.
  10. "Have we landed on the moon?" - no we haven't. Only Americans landed on Moon. This wasn't international mission it was single-nation mission, so saying "we" as humanity is wrong. This modern fairytale of "united humanity" is fail in our space exploration (and in our way of thinking), because we as "united humanity" couldn't do more than single nation could do. There should be historical lesson for all space programs... but it is omitted by most of people talking about space missions. ...also I would like to see evidence of their landing confirmed by other countries after they send there m
  11. Would be nice if editor would show us arrows where is top/bottom using selected control part.
  12. If you want to lose all stored energy, yes, but we don't want to lose it, we want to get it back
  13. Yes, which means if you would be able to build device that would disorienting atoms of neodymium you should in result also get fraction of energy used in process of manufacturing neodymium magnet.
  14. You are wrong... take for example neodymium, this is your spring. If you put energy in it you add magnetic capabilities to this piece of metal. Now you have squeezed spring ready to make work (release energy). Key thing is to develop mechanism able to drain energy stored in neodymium and of course you can not drain more energy than you stored
×
×
  • Create New...