Do you play with Camera Wobble on?

[Rithsom]

In one of the Devnotes a few weeks back, the Devs stated they were going to add Camera Wobble to the game. Quite a few people were opposed of the idea then, so I'm wondering if this is still the case. Do you play with Camera Wobble enabled?

I do, it's on for both internal and external view. It makes selecting smaller parts a bit harder when in atmospheric flight, but other than that I find it quite nice.

Edited May 26, 2015 by Rthsom

[mythbusters844]

I find the external wobble extremely nauseating. It would be fine if there wasn't that stupid camera sway during atmospheric flight. As for internal wobble, I keep it enabled, but I turn it off sometimes because it makes pressing RPM's little buttons hard.

[Hobbes Novakoff]

I love the camera sway in atmo. It makes it so much more... Atmospheric.​

[dryer_lint]

It makes rockets look so much more powerful, instead of looking like an upside-down stove. I agree that it gets a bit nauseating when there's only a little bit of motion - they need to add some sort of cutoff system, so that the wobble only activates when you know it's going to really shake and not just tilt back and forth

[Hotaru]

I voted internal only, actually I have it turned up to 200% for internal and down to 25% for external. I love it in IVA view, really makes you feel the acceleration on launches and reentries. I like it in external view too, in principle, but I found the swaying effect really distracting since I could never tell whether the camera was swaying or the actual rocket, so I had to turn it way down so it's hardly noticeable anymore.

[biohazard15]

This "wobble" is a Hollywoody-style effect that has nothing to do with real life (especially the external wobble, which is just nauseating). Turned both external and internal off.

[zarakon]

It's a nice effect for when things go wrong, or when making hard turns in planes. I just wish it would stay still when things are running smoothly. I had to turn it off because I like to fly planes in Locked camera mode, and the constant movement made it hard to tell when I actually had the camera centered correctly

[Captain Sierra]

On external mine's turned down to 20% of default (the variable sensitivity in place of an on/off was very thoughtful; thx Squad). It does not become noticable unless I pull 10+ G's or my entire launch vehicle explodes, at which point the camera shakes quite appropriately.

On internal mine's default. I don't do enough stuff IVA to make it worth changing.

I go to a tech school where we have enough KSP players to build a small fan club. We've gotten together with DMP and a telemachus LAN server and done IVA-only missions with two of us in cockpit, 1 in map view with timewarp control, and the other 5 in mission control suites. It'd be cool to turn up the shake to 250% for that.

[dryer_lint]

Just wanted to add: I also love how the camera shakes when parts explode nearby! It really adds to the feeling when your rocket crashes...

[MartGonzo]

Default settings on external, maxed out on internal.

although tbh I still think Kerbquake was better, especially as it also worked with the first person EVA

[CalculusWarrior]

I turned external shake down a bit, it gets rid of most of the normal atmospheric shaking, but still lets you know when you're pulling some high g's. As for internal shake, I've turned it up; nothing is quite as cool as banking in a plane and having the camera shake around.

[keeper]

I am opposed to the wobble of weapons in fps games, prefer the gun to stay still.

I was going to put quakecam on but the sway and wobble with nice sound fx is somewhat fitting the bill.

[problemecium]

It's a nice concept in the interest of effectual candy, but in practice it makes it hard to do practical things like right-click on parts and is generally jarring.

[G'th]

I only turn down either setting when I have tough eva's going on. The shake makes it harder to grab onto stuff when the game decides to bug out.

[WWEdeadman]

I turned it down to half the default on the outside view, but I have it on on both.

[regex]

I turned it completely off, it was incredibly annoying during long burns.

[LABHOUSE]

Max on internal to be more realistic (you shake if you are inside, but not if you are a floating camera).

80% on external because it is distracting and more realistic this way.

Edited May 26, 2015 by LABHOUSE

[Tex]

I never found the wobble nauseating, in fact I find I'm usually extremely cabable of judging orientation (I really need to try out a gyroscope or NASA's centrifuge one of these days...), and in fact I thought it was extremely entertaining when having a Flea booster make the camera shake violently in its short burst.

Even better was the one time I suddenly got violent shaking when I was coming in too hot on a re-entry, and just barely survived the landing by opening my chute. That was the first time KSP ever made my heart actually race!

[LordFerret]

I turned it completely off after the first launch I did. If I want wobble, I'll do a few shots of Jack and take my glasses off.

[moogoob]

Love it. Keep it at 1 for external and turned it up to 2 for IVA views.

[rkman]

I reduced both to 50%. Gives visual indication of 'something unusual happening to the craft' without being nauseating.

[Mister Kerman]

Reduced in IVA, and turned off for external view.

So awesome!

[Idrryl]

I run it both on EVA and IVA on default settings, it's a good G-force gauge. And besides, it looks cool

[Rainbowtrout]

I have it on 200% external and internal. It adds a factor of "Oh my god, this is a giant bomb where many things could go wrong!" to the craft. I can understand why some don't like it as much/at all; the menus for the parts moving is annoying.

[Wjolcz]

Only internal on 200%