[1.12.x] DeepFreeze (v0.31.0) 12th Sep 2021

rasta013 · September 2, 2015

That would explain it right there actually - I'm running Ship Manifest also. Will patiently await the update and give it another whirl!

JPLRepo · September 8, 2015

Progress update. v0.18.2.0 is on the horizon.

It will include updated support for your own internal-less DeepFreeze parts - yes add DeepFreezer module to any crew able part as long as there is no internal.

New internal camera support/modes/switching.

Cryopod windows that actually are clear when open and freeze over when closed (animated).

we have not had time to work on the radial single kerbal pod the past two weeks as we have been busy preparing some DeepFreeze parts that will be actually released as part of another mod (more on that soon).

But the radial single kerbal pod is next on our list.

stay tuned. Cheers.

ArkaelDren · September 9, 2015

We are all patiently awaiting the Cryo-goodness. I have to say, the sound of a gentle cracking, while final freeze takes place gives me the chills still, Nice touch...

JPLRepo · September 9, 2015

We are all patiently awaiting the Cryo-goodness. I have to say, the sound of a gentle cracking, while final freeze takes place gives me the chills still, Nice touch...

Unless there is a disaster should be out by the weekend.

lajoswinkler · September 9, 2015

I'll just leave this here.

Finally, the analytic thermodynamic code has been improved to give it a more gradual transition between temperatures, which can be configured globally and on a per-part basis. All this is a fancy way of saying that the game will support (for example) refrigerated interiors.

Businfu · September 9, 2015

Unless there is a disaster should be out by the weekend.

Man those look good.....

I wanted to bring up a thought I had. People had previously discussed the whole HAL Space Odyssey thing. In my save I decided that any ship which utilizes a cryo pod needs to have the RC-L01 Remote Guidance Unit on board (which is the big, heavy, 2.5m probe core that I generally find to be otherwise pointless), mostly because I enjoy making things difficult. Is there any way to make this an actual hard dependency? Of course this is something that many players probably aren't interested in, but it would be good to know for my own save, and maybe there are some other interesting things that could be added as well.

Generally part of my reason for this self-limitation is that I feel the cryo pods are amazingly good, and they also represent technology which is currently not possible. Requiring a highly advanced probe core makes them much more expensive in terms of science. Also on this note, I play with CTT and I moved the parts up to the 'Specialized Science Tech' and 'Long Term Science Tech' nodes. I noted mention of including a CTT mm config a few pages back, but I didn't see one in the download. Here is the cfg if anyone is interested:



@PART[CRY-0300Freezer]:NEEDS[CommunityTechTree]{
    @TechRequired = specializedScienceTech
}


@PART[GlykerolTankRadial]:NEEDS[CommunityTechTree]
{
    @TechRequired = specializedScienceTech
}


@PART[CRY-1300Freezer]:NEEDS[CommunityTechTree]
{
    @TechRequired = longTermScienceTech
}


@PART[CRY-2300Freezer]:NEEDS[CommunityTechTree]
{
    @TechRequired = longTermScienceTech
}

Edited September 9, 2015 by Businfu

ArkaelDren · September 10, 2015

Nice of you to leave this great piece of news. Now lets see if its going to work as intended.

Edit: Referring to post #180

Edited September 11, 2015 by ArkaelDren

JPLRepo · September 11, 2015

Man those look good.....
I wanted to bring up a thought I had. People had previously discussed the whole HAL Space Odyssey thing. In my save I decided that any ship which utilizes a cryo pod needs to have the RC-L01 Remote Guidance Unit on board (which is the big, heavy, 2.5m probe core that I generally find to be otherwise pointless), mostly because I enjoy making things difficult. Is there any way to make this an actual hard dependency? Of course this is something that many players probably aren't interested in, but it would be good to know for my own save, and maybe there are some other interesting things that could be added as well.
Generally part of my reason for this self-limitation is that I feel the cryo pods are amazingly good, and they also represent technology which is currently not possible. Requiring a highly advanced probe core makes them much more expensive in terms of science. Also on this note, I play with CTT and I moved the parts up to the 'Specialized Science Tech' and 'Long Term Science Tech' nodes. I noted mention of including a CTT mm config a few pages back, but I didn't see one in the download. Here is the cfg if anyone is interested:
@PART[CRY-0300Freezer]:NEEDS[CommunityTechTree]{
    @TechRequired = specializedScienceTech
}


@PART[GlykerolTankRadial]:NEEDS[CommunityTechTree]
{
    @TechRequired = specializedScienceTech
}


@PART[CRY-1300Freezer]:NEEDS[CommunityTechTree]
{
    @TechRequired = longTermScienceTech
}


@PART[CRY-2300Freezer]:NEEDS[CommunityTechTree]
{
    @TechRequired = longTermScienceTech
}

Short of modifying the DeepFreeze code, or any other mod code, I am not aware of any way to make a hard dependency between one part (mod part, with mod partmodule) be reliant upon another part.

You just have to enforce your own rules upon your own save game manually.

People are free to modify and create their own Module Manager changes/configs, etc as they see fit. All I ask is that if you intend to re-distribute DeepFreeze Continued... code, configs, models, etc you must do so within the rules of the License agreement (see the OP). Or, if you intend to just distribute your own module manager change config files, that you clearly state that it is their own configs/changes and that I will not support said re-distribution/configs/files. But you are free to post them here or anywhere else. I fully support those who want to do things like this and am happy for you to do so. but it is too much of an overhead for me to manage and distribute and support all these modified configs, etc.

Edited September 11, 2015 by JPLRepo

JPLRepo · September 11, 2015

V0.18.2.0 is out. See the Changelog in the OP for all the changes.

Should not break saves, but as always backup your save before upgrading.

You do not need to re-download my TACLS workaround if you already have that installed. It should work fine if you upgraded it with the last version.

For those asking and wanting to create their own internal-less Freezer parts, instructions can be found on the WIKI. NB: Why you would want to do this and miss out on MerlinsMaster's amazing internals, well that is up to you. Support for your own created internal-less parts is not provided.

Edited September 11, 2015 by JPLRepo

Gkirmathal · September 11, 2015

Odd, with a full clean install of 0.18.2.0 I am no longer getting the KSP Deepfreeze icon in the defaul KSP toobar. Nor do I have a rightclick menu on the part. IVA's show, but pod models are closed.

output_log entries:

- AssemblyLoader: Assembly 'DeepFreeze' has not met dependency 'DFInterface' V0.3

- AssemblyLoader: Assembly 'DeepFreeze' is missing 1 dependencies

- Cannot find a Module of typename 'DeepFreeze'

JPLRepo · September 11, 2015

OK, so something else we have been working on. We have created a DeepFreeze part for the Kerbal Planetary Base System by Nils277. The parts will include a base part - The CRY-5000 - with a 4 kerbal capacity and a Glykerol tank that fit in with the KPBS mod parts and styles. Nils277 will be releasing these parts as part of his mod (in the next day or two). So head over to his mod thread for more details and the release of these parts. You will need his Mod for the parts (when he releases) and DeepFreeze Continued... V0.18.2.0 if you want these glorious parts for your bases.

The CRY-5000 includes a Glykerol tank on-board, 4 cryopods, animated Lightstrips, the new V0.18.2.0 pod window animations and supports RPM Transparent pods feature and props.

Edited September 11, 2015 by JPLRepo

JPLRepo · September 11, 2015

Odd, with a full clean install of 0.18.2.0 I am no longer getting the KSP Deepfreeze icon in the defaul KSP toobar. Nor do I have a rightclick menu on the part. IVA's show, but pod models are closed.
output_log entries:
- AssemblyLoader: Assembly 'DeepFreeze' has not met dependency 'DFInterface' V0.3
- AssemblyLoader: Assembly 'DeepFreeze' is missing 1 dependencies
- Cannot find a Module of typename 'DeepFreeze'

My bad, my build script has left out a file. You are missing DFInterface.dll from \GameData\REPOSoftTech\DeepFreeze\Plugins

You can get the single file here.

Or, I have updated the release files and put out version 0.18.2.1 which includes this file. See the OP for the usual download links.

Gkirmathal · September 12, 2015

My bad, my build script has left out a file. You are missing DFInterface.dll from \GameData\REPOSoftTech\DeepFreeze\Plugins
You can get the single file here.
Or, I have updated the release files and put out version 0.18.2.1 which includes this file. See the OP for the usual download links.

Super thanks for the quick fix!

lajoswinkler · September 12, 2015

Whoa, will that 4-Kerbal part be inline? Looks great. What are its dimensions?

JPLRepo · September 12, 2015

Whoa, will that 4-Kerbal part be inline? Looks great. What are its dimensions?

It's a standard KPBS part. It will be distributed as part of KPBS mod as an add-on.

KPBS parts stack two parts bottom to bottom to make a standard 2.5M Part (so two KPBS parts bottom to bottom) are then inline stackable.

lajoswinkler · September 13, 2015

And what's its mass compared to a standard 10 Kerbal unit?

JPLRepo · September 13, 2015

And what's its mass compared to a standard 10 Kerbal unit?

That will be up to Nils277, but if he doesn't change it the CRY-2300 (10 kerbal) is 5.25 (dry weight) and the CRY-5000 (KPBS 4 kerbal part) will be 2.7 (dry weight).

Shaymes · September 16, 2015

i realy like this mod, but i have a wish

i like that the chamer need power and generate heat, but i dont like that my kerbals dies

my wish is a *safety* setting that kerbals trown if the part becomes to hot and dont die if the heat is to high or have no power

but realy nice mod

JPLRepo · September 16, 2015

i realy like this mod, but i have a wish
i like that the chamer need power and generate heat, but i dont like that my kerbals dies
my wish is a *safety* setting that kerbals trown if the part becomes to hot and dont die if the heat is to high or have no power
but realy nice mod

I can certainly make it optional that they don't die... but what is supposed to happen to them if they don't die? What is "trown"?

Shaymes · September 17, 2015

maybe i spell it wrong "trown" = unfreeze, thaw,

maybe overheat means the controls are broken and unfreeze is impossible or they unfreeze automaticly maybe it cost more Glykerol to freeze or Glykerol drain over time and then they unfreeze automaticly - like that

and i think i found a bug, i see a picture with open chambers but i cant open the chambers

thats the reason why i use USI life support and not TAC i love my kerbals and dont want them to die

Edited September 17, 2015 by Shaymes

JPLRepo · September 17, 2015

maybe i spell it wrong "trown" = unfreeze, thaw,
maybe overheat means the controls are broken and unfreeze is impossible or they unfreeze automaticly maybe it cost more Glykerol to freeze or Glykerol drain over time and then they unfreeze automaticly - like that
and i think i found a bug, i see a picture with open chambers but i cant open the chambers
thats the reason why i use USI life support and not TAC i love my kerbals and dont want them to die

With regards to bug reports, please follow the instructions in the OP. I require description of the problem, steps to reproduce the error, a full debug log (not the Ksp.log).

I am not following what you mean by "i see a picture with open chambers but i cant open the chambers". You need to describe the problem and how to reproduce the problem.

IE: "I see a picture" - what picture? "I cant open the chambers" - there is no function in DeepFreeze to "open the chambers"?

What do other people think? If the kerbals don't die because of overheat or if EC runs out - what should happen? I'm looking for ideas and suggestions of what people would like to see happen.

Itsdavyjones · September 17, 2015

Maybe what you could do is that if it starts over heating, it takes more electricity to keep the kerbals frozen, and if the power runs out, maybe have a special power resource built into the module that will wake up the kerbals.

Shaymes · September 18, 2015

i love the idea of Itsdavyjones that overheat needs more EC over time

i mean this picture and the CRY-300 is open, you can see inside, that was that what i mean

http://i.imgur.com/GPowD3m.png

(i retextre the Co2 canister from universal storage that i have a nice Glykerol canister )

JPLRepo · September 18, 2015

i love the idea of Itsdavyjones that overheat needs more EC over time
i mean this picture and the CRY-300 is open, you can see inside, that was that what i mean
http://i.imgur.com/GPowD3m.png
(i retextre the Co2 canister from universal storage that i have a nice Glykerol canister )

The door opening on the CRY-300 is only active if you have RasterPropMonitor mod installed if that is what you mean. If you do not have RPM installed you cannot open the doors or see inside from the outside. As per the install instructions and optional mods list in the OP

Shaymes · September 18, 2015

ok thx, i didnt know that

what you think about Itsdavyjones suggestion for a save mode?

[1.12.x] DeepFreeze (v0.31.0) 12th Sep 2021

Recommended Posts

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation