Jump to content

[1.11.x] AmpYear Main & Reserve Power Manager (v1.5.9.0) 22nd Feb 2021


Recommended Posts

On 10/3/2021 at 3:04 AM, JPLRepo said:

I understand your pain, but I don't think I will be doing that. IT's because all my mods use the IMGUI method. Which unless I switch it all over to use a canvas can't be scaled with the rest of the UI.

The tl;dr version is: It's a lot of work, and I don't have the motivation to do it.

I'm sorry to hear that, but I understand. Your mods are awesome, but they'll be the only ones in my 100+ list I cannot properly read in the glory of 4K. :P  #FirstWorldProblems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

@JPLRepo or Anyone else that can answer this.

I've been using this mod in stock KSP for a while and I tried it out in JNSQ which is about a 2.5x rescale of KSP, but i notice the darkside calcs are incorrect. (Usually short by about 20%-25% EC and dark side transit time)

SO my question. Does this mod account for the planets being larger than stock? for example RSS or JNSQ.

If not, is there a MM Patch I can create to account for the increase in scale?

Thanks for the help.

Edited by Shizen
Link to comment
Share on other sites


For scaling stuff to fit to planet packs I use a template like this:

	scalefactor = 1
	@scalefactor:NEEDS[SigDim] = #[email protected]/Rescale$
	@scalefactor:NEEDS[!SigDim,RealSolarSystem] = 10.10625
	@scalefactor:NEEDS[!SigDim,JNSQ] = 2.7
	@scalefactor:NEEDS[!SigDim,GPP_Rescale_10x] = 10
	@scalefactor:NEEDS[!SigDim,JNSQ_Rescale_10x] = 10
	scalesqrt = #$scalefactor$
	@scalesqrt != 0.5

and then from within a patch node I refer to #$/scalesqrt$ to for example multiply with it.
In some cases I even use #$/scalefactor$ if I need the bigger number.

In a later patch I remove those temporary variables to unclutter the MM cache.

Edited by Gordon Dry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 4/13/2022 at 2:18 AM, FasterThanFlourite said:

After some testing I found out that AmpYear sadly was a massive FPS drain. Removing it improved my FPS by about ~10-15.

quite likely given it was the first mod I ever did for KSP, and some of the features are very inefficient

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...