Jump to content

A question on the practicality of Space Shuttles


Recommended Posts

"I'd go so far as to argue that a large majority of all KSP flights that end catastrophically do so when landing (deliberately or otherwise)."

Not true with _my_ spaceplanes. They are often destroyed in flight (atmospheric pressure destroys the ship when i try some manoeuvre and i forgot to hit the "caps lock" key for smooth controls).

I must admit i landed successfully only once.

But most of my spaceplane fail BEFORE i try to land !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, in KSP I also think landing is the most challenging part of an SSTO mission. Usually because the plane you are flying is a big and unwieldy whale, and it's so heavy and has so little lift for the supersonic phase, you have to come in fast. Kinda like the STS landings actually....

With smaller craft it's usually a relaxed affair.

And....I want stock rotors in KSP. Damn fixed wing dictatorship...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hang on, hang on! We're all missing the most important statement in the OP:

...[the Space Shuttle is] still one of the most iconic spacecraft and one of the first you learn about as a kid

*Sob* Apollo was still the icon when I was a kid (and whether it would get to the moon).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I will double it here:

Okay.

I tried to make career-useful shuttle. Well, I mostly cheated my way through anything that stood between me and design and test process, yet the results.

First of all, I still fail at shuttles, at Mk3 shuttles at least, I mean.

Second, it is possible to bring Mk3 shuttle stack up to 6 000 m/s of delta-vee for less than ~110 000 funds with solid boosters and for ~140 000 funds with liquid ones with ~40 000 funds recovered - I just need to tweak engine placement (I tried to design stack without RCS building aid mod, because I am too often rely on it).

I used MPL as payload and benchmarked my shuttle against space station contracts. Payment for successful science-lab-including five-kerballed space station is 132 250 funds. Double this figure for the Mun station contract.

That means that the shuttle stack will pay itself in stock career, in three-four runs for Kerbin or if you lucky in one Munshot.

Are there more economically efficient designs? Sure.

Still the STS-alike can be profitable in KSP. Maybe I will refine the design so it will be easy in use even for me in couple days.

So non-optimized design should bring like 30-40% of recoverability and have uses in stock.

Hope it helped and hope I'm not too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys I think there's a way to recover the first stage of a rocket without mods! I think attaching a probe core will let it be recovered, provided it has parachutes.

Probe cores don't stop things being despawned due to atmosphere. I forget what the exact figures are, but it's something like below 30km altitude and beyond 5km distance from the active craft, anything in an atmosphere despawns regardless whether it's got a crew, probe core or anything, UNLESS it's already stationary on the surface.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...