Jump to content

[1.3.x] CONTARES 1.8.9 closed


hraban

Recommended Posts

A spacecraft that is based on the "Zarya" project of the 80's.

Start the engines, and they understand the name: english "dawn", german "Morgenrot"

Technical specifications:

Takeoff weight: 4.9 t

Diameter: 1.875m

Kerbonaut: 4

Integrated heat shield

Integrated RCS

Integrated maneuver, rescue and landing engines (16 pieces) with a total of 160 kN thrust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A spacecraft that is based on the "Zarya" project of the 80's.

Start the engines, and they understand the name: english "dawn", german "Morgenrot"

Technical specifications:

Takeoff weight: 4.9 t

Diameter: 1.875m

Kerbonaut: 4

Integrated heat shield

Integrated RCS

Integrated maneuver, rescue and landing engines (16 pieces) with a total of 160 kN thrust.

Wow!

Love the RCS setup!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying the texture is the same and the color adjusted via Unity?

(i write extra slow ;) )

The basic texture of all capsules is the same. All capsules have now Tantares-gray colors.

For capsules with thermal blanket another shader and thus an additional Unity model is needed. For all types of Morgenrot change the texture format to .png so it's easily to exchange provided color variations of the thermal blanket btw. the complete texture.

That's the way it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far, I missed the lattice stage decoupler that are so often seen on eastern rockets. Now I know why, this inconspicuous part is a polygon grave!

Possibly for this reason crashes KSP so much when the ALV 2nd stage is used?

IqtzzWp.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fear of generating "too many" polygons is rather nonsense for ksp. Ksp will bog down by physics load (active physics parts), not by polycount. Especially not in space.

We are talking quake-era polycount on most ksp models. I mean, how many are there on the interstage? Its only 24sided, each side about 14 quads or so per side for the lattice, maybe another 4 on the dome per side and a triangle for the bottom. Makes about 880 Tris. I've seen single, unoptimized parts with 360 THOUSAND Tris in. That is where performance starts to drop. (With an old 275GTX)

So should we optimize our parts: of course! Should we fear adding some more Vertices to greatly enhance visuals or to avoid coplaner Polygons? No!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hraban,

This is a great addition to Tantares. Just wanted to stop by and say: Keep at it!

Lots of little parts, fun things to stick on stations especially, is always welcome in trying to make a unique little feeling of your own in KSP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hraban,

This is a great addition to Tantares. Just wanted to stop by and say: Keep at it!

Lots of little parts, fun things to stick on stations especially, is always welcome in trying to make a unique little feeling of your own in KSP.

Many thanks!

With the next update will appear further, more or less useful, definitely eye-catching items.

Planned are:

- 4.0m station boom with triangular cross section and 0.625m nodes

- The "Khleb" periscope (Camera function planned)

- The lattice framework Decoupler

and much more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...