[STOCK] The Legendary Warbirds of World War II (Aircraft Pack) [Most Recent: Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero]

[Columbia]

21 hours ago, EVA_Reentry/Strangelove II said:

21 hours ago, EVA_Reentry/Strangelove II said:

Please link for B-17!!

sugegstion: add a chin turret

Please link for B-17!!

sugegstion: add a chin turret

And I thought the B-17 already lost interest..

Done, done and.. done.

The aircraft's been updated, and looks different now (Check the link.)

[Columbia]

List updated; Bf 109 revised, Me 262 added, B-17 pictures changed and P-51D added.

[Columbia]

Updated a few descriptions.

[AdrianK.]

Awesome replicas! I love them all, especially the Me-262  

[Columbia]

On 22 February 2016 at 1:00 AM, AdrianK. said:

Awesome replicas! I love them all, especially the Me-262  

Thank you! 

[TedwinKnockman66]

I think need a Soviet planes like a :Yak-9, La-7, Il-2, Pe-2, TB-3

[Columbia]

20 hours ago, TedwinKnockman66 said:

I think need a Soviet planes like a :Yak-9, La-7, Il-2, Pe-2, TB-3

That's a really good point. I once worked on a Yak-9 but failed at the cockpit, and an attempt at an IL-2 failed at one point as well.

I was thinking about an La-5FN as well, but I might need to expand on the other nations first before setting to work on the Soviets.

Updated thread; new centered logo and description. 

[pTrevTrevs]

1 hour ago, Columbia said:

That's a really good point. I once worked on a Yak-9 but failed at the cockpit, and an attempt at an IL-2 failed at one point as well.

I was thinking about an La-5FN as well, but I might need to expand on the other nations first before setting to work on the Soviets.

Updated thread; new centered logo and description. 

I bet a Yak-1 wouldn't be too hard, neither would an I-16.

[Columbia]

On 5/27/2016 at 10:59 AM, pTrevTrevs said:

I bet a Yak-1 wouldn't be too hard, neither would an I-16.

An I-16 would be a breeze -- the size and open cockpit would make it easier than some other planes.

A Yak-1 though would be somewhat more tedious, especially with that cockpit.

[TedwinKnockman66]

Your FW-190 More like a Ta-152

[Columbia]

13 hours ago, TedwinKnockman66 said:

Your FW-190 More like a Ta-152

It does look like one. I'm planning to replace it with a Focke-Wulf 190 A-8 instead.

 

[Nommykins]

I don't know if this has been asked yet, but how did you make those fighter cockpits with struts just floating midair? Was it .craft editing or something else? By the way, these look great.

[Columbia]

13 hours ago, Nommykins said:

I don't know if this has been asked yet, but how did you make those fighter cockpits with struts just floating midair? Was it .craft editing or something else? By the way, these look great.

Thanks! I used Editor Extensions Redux for the strut editing (It has no offset limits which is vital), I made a tutorial about it at the near-bottom of the page here: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/39663-open-source-construction-techniques-for-craft-aesthetics/&page=41#comment-2578629 

[Xannari Ferrows]

I have to admit it's a little strange not seeing the Bayerische Flugzeugwerke here. I suppose the Fw 190 will have to represent. Germans sure knew how to build their fighters.

[Columbia]

5 hours ago, Xannari Ferrows said:

I have to admit it's a little strange not seeing the Bayerische Flugzeugwerke here. I suppose the Fw 190 will have to represent. Germans sure knew how to build their fighters.

Are you referring to the Bf 109? It's supposedly there, the first plane in the German category.

[Xannari Ferrows]

16 minutes ago, Columbia said:

Are you referring to the Bf 109? It's supposedly there, the first plane in the German category.

Oh I guess they are the same. Never heard of that name though. Possibly that for some of the variants.

Edited May 31, 2016 by Xannari Ferrows

[Colonel Cbplayer]

I wish you put all these aircraft in separate threads so I can give you more rep

[Columbia]

22 hours ago, cbplayer2012 said:

I wish you put all these aircraft in separate threads so I can give you more rep

Thanks, mate!

On 6/1/2016 at 2:22 AM, Xannari Ferrows said:

Oh I guess they are the same. Never heard of that name though. Possibly that for some of the variants.

It's usually called the "Messerschmitt" or "Me 109" or the "109", and it has a lot of names, so that's not unusual 

[Xannari Ferrows]

Germany, you so silly

[Columbia]

On 6/2/2016 at 7:30 PM, Xannari Ferrows said:

Germany, you so silly

True. They did make some fine engineering pieces though. 

 

[Xannari Ferrows]

7 hours ago, Columbia said:

True. They did make some fine engineering pieces though.

Imagine a fuel efficient Tiger II

[V7 Aerospace]

You should definitely add the Hawker Typhoon to the British list. It deserves some love too... 

(Great replicas btw.)

On 5 June 2016 at 11:31 PM, Xannari Ferrows said:

Imagine a fuel efficient Tiger II

Imagine a more mobile Maus...

[Columbia]

On 7/4/2016 at 6:30 PM, V7 Aerospace said:

You should definitely add the Hawker Typhoon to the British list. It deserves some love too... 

(Great replicas btw.)

Imagine a more mobile Maus...

I actually considered the idea, and nearly finished a similar-looking Tempest, but I have no idea what happened to it. A Typhoon would work great with rockets, too. I'll try giving it a shot again when I finish my other projects.

 

And also, imagine a long-ranged Bf 109.

[Papahemmy]

Does it work or is it only to say that SQUAD ADD ROTORS TO KSP!

[pTrevTrevs]

3 hours ago, Columbia said:

And also, imagine a long-ranged Bf 109.

Imagine a German heavy bomber that didn't have a tendency to catch on fire, worked well, and was available in large numbers.