Recommended Posts

EVA Parachutes & Ejection Seats, vens stock revamp, mechjeb 2, and kerbal engineer redux.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I don't want KER because I want to do the calculations by hand, like how everyone should play KsP

Edited by mabdi36

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Don't tell me what to do

I use it for terrain altitude.

KAC, Scatterer, Texture Replacer

Edited by DeltaDizzy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KER would be nice in stock, and I heard other people say to put a RSS option, so you don't have to suffer the installation (I Don't use ckan) and bugs when you play

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On February 6, 2016 at 8:29 PM, MachoCyclone said:

I have B9 Aerospace, KW Rocketry, Kerbal Attachment System (KAS), the Interstellar mod, MechJeb2 (although I hardly use it anymore) Out Planets Pack, Other Worlds Star Pack, SafeChute, Final Frontier (not sure why its named that as it gives badges and ranks to your Kerbals), Infernal Robtics and the necessary dependencies to support the mods. They were all installed using CKAN.

 

I also followed this video on how to make KSP run more reliably. 

You have Mechjeb? Noice. :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like Kerbal Engineer, or at least the stuff in the editor. Also editor extensions, KAC, Procedural Parts, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SpaceCube2000 said:

SVE, SVT, Scatterer, Distant Object Enhancement, PlanetShine. 

Why would you choose scatterer? Don't you know that most people(including me)does not have a fast enough computer to process that! It would slow down my computer to the speed of a snail!

Edited by dundun93

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, dundun93 said:

Why would you choose scatterer? Don't you know that most people(including me)does not have a fast enough computer to process that! It would slow down my computer to the speed of a snail!

EXACTLY! THAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH STOCK MODS. KSP IS SUPPOSED TO BE EASY ON YOUR COMPUTER. DEBATABLE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me personally, I enjoy the visual mod Scatterer. It gives planets with an atmosphere a clean look. Also the sunrises from Duna are pretty neeto. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PoliteDenial said:

For me personally, I enjoy the visual mod Scatterer. It gives planets with an atmosphere a clean look. Also the sunrises from Duna are pretty neeto. :)

BUT IT SHOULD NOT BE STOCK!

but i do like it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, mabdi36 said:

EXACTLY! THAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH STOCK MODS. KSP IS SUPPOSED TO BE EASY ON YOUR COMPUTER. DEBATABLE

He just tried scatterer... he turned his computer into a toaster:wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, dundun93 said:

Why would you choose scatterer? Don't you know that most people(including me)does not have a fast enough computer to process that! It would slow down my computer to the speed of a snail!

Because it looks nice. Players would be able to disable it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SpaceCube2000 said:

Because it looks nice. Players would be able to disable it. 

oh ok

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want any mods in stock. Mods are optional extras, and removing the "optional" bit from that for some mods would just be annoying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want a extra type of save that is like Kerbal Kommander. I want to be a space pirate, miner, colonist, or merchant!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

IR, and not a mod yet but the better Kareer Kontracts link in my signature...

a smaller scientific missile size. And also have it stay loaded and head to an altitude.

Edited by KerBlitz Kerman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Modular Rocket System, KER, Docking Assist...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need chaterrer Karbala engineer plus a metric crapton of other "stock" mods

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately TweakScale, Planetshine, Airplane Plus/KAX and RealAtmospheres for a start

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All i want Just PROCEDURAL PART AND BETTER BURN TIME!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 30/07/2017 at 9:12 AM, MiffedStarfish said:

I don't want any mods in stock.

As soon as a feature is integrated into the stock game it ceases to be a mod and is then stock.

Like docking for example. I bet you use docking even though that used to be a mod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, John FX said:

As soon as a feature is integrated into the stock game it ceases to be a mod and is then stock.

Like docking for example. I bet you use docking even though that used to be a mod.

That is his point. When it get integrated into stock the option to not have it is gone, while nothing was really added.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 13/10/2017 at 5:58 PM, Spricigo said:

That is his point. When it get integrated into stock the option to not have it is gone, while nothing was really added.

That can be said of any feature, it is not a valid argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, John FX said:

That can be said of any feature, it is not a valid argument.

No it's not necessary like that for any feature. Take  for an example satellite networks, before Comment there was the Remote Tech mod. Remote Tech is  still an option for those that prefer the way RT handles the communication, stock Commnet didn't 'kill' or "replaced' RT but rather added a third option (no network, RT, Commnet).

Granted that now Commnet is part of the stock game there is no "KSP install without Commnet" but that is besides the point, @MiffedStarfish's concern may as well be about the 'big' mods that makes extensive changes to the game, not the simple "add this part"/"tweak this readout" /"provide a simple mechanic"  variants. Keeping the example,  Commnet can be seen as a "lesser problem" or even "a good feature" that besides the worries add something good for the majority of the player without much hassle for anyone while the "make Remote Tech stock" option would be a bit more intrusive

Of course that is not a big deal for a few 'good mods' , but as we add more and more some PotatoesTM start to become crispy and some hamsters start to get tired after a quick exercise in the wheel that runs the CPU, and the less fortunate player that need to play in those conditions have reason to be concerned. It's not really the decisive factor but something the devs should consider.

 

Personally, I have my list of mods that "should be stock"  but also a number of mods I use  and see no necessity (and even reason against) to be integrated in the core game. I would not mind if those become stock but can understand who will be bothered by the game becoming more complex than 'necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now