Jump to content

Least fuel to Kerbin orbit challenge


Recommended Posts

Objective: get to Kerbin orbit (Pe > 70 km) starting with the least fuel (liquid+oxidizer+solid).

  • Stock parts only (sandbox mode), no mods, manual piloting (SAS/RCS/reaction wheels allowed), no cheating, no refuelling.
  • Multi stages allowed but be nice and don't use decouplers for propulsion.
  • All stock engines allowed excepted electric.
  • Payload/reentry not required, just get a pod to Pe > 70 km.
  • Scoring: least fuel at takeoff (liquid+oxidizer+solid) wins. Unused fuel doesn't matter.
  • Tip: you don't need to take off with completely filled tanks.

 

My record (pictures to come): 30.6 liquid fuel + 22 oxidizer = 52.6 units.

Edited by Ocirne94
Missing details
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a theoretical solution with 16.2 LF and 8.8 OX.

The important bit: switch to a smaller probe. Both engines are vectoring, so we don't need the reaction wheels: we can use the okto2. That saves 60kg. Doesn't sound like much, but it's a bit over 38% of the upper-stage dry mass. Given Nich needed 10.47 LF and 12.8 OX, my smaller stage will require just 6.42 LF and 7.85 OX.

And then, there's another trick: according to Nich we need 9 units of LF for the jet. There's plenty of room for that in the Oscar. Just put it there, make the decoupler cross-feed, and ditch the Mk0 tank.

So we're trying to pack 15.42 LF and 7.85 OX into an Oscar. The closest we can tweak this to is 16.2 and 8.8.

Given the mass reductions, there might be a reduction in LF needed by the Panther, but I'm not sure it's really significant. My concept on reduced the dry mass of the panther stage by 10%.

 

Now, to fly this... it is so insanely twitchy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Nich: you didn't take that much fuel out; you need to switch to a lighter probe body to be able to fit all the fuel in the oscar.

I flew a handful of times last night, had trouble with control because when I'd hit a button, I'd suddenly be upside down. Turn on SAS, it oscillates like mad. I remembered at the end of my session that I could reduce the gimbal, and that will probably do it.

The panther's CoM seems to be quite far ahead of the visuals of the part; I get a center of mass ahead moving of the probe body when I add the engine, whereas normally it's barely ahead of the ant.

Edited by numerobis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
4 minutes ago, dunebugmi said:

Can I use an ion drive?  

ion=electric, so I'd guess the answer to that one would be "no".

(edit: I have sent up clusters of very simple comsats consisting of a flat OKTO core, one antenna and an RTG, for a payload weight of next to nothing. Pretty sure I can get it lighter.

Edited by ihtoit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...