Jump to content

Now that's strutting your stuff


Jasonden

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Choctofliatrio2.0 said:

That's disappointing of JAXA. NASA uses all-American, all stock parts, as it should be.

That's what you claim. I say that they rely heavily on the FASA mod, especially for their early launches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Kerbart said:

Are the Japanese tax payers aware that their space agency is spending their hard earned money on those mods that use parts with in-between sizes?

Procedural SRBs, certainly. They look like 1.5m parts, comparing them in paint.net.

Six struts per booster seems a bit much though. I wouldn't have used more than three, if that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tfin said:

Procedural SRBs, certainly. They look like 1.5m parts, comparing them in paint.net.

Six struts per booster seems a bit much though. I wouldn't have used more than three, if that.

I don't use the top once as i have the radial decoupler there. But I do have one horizontal strut at the bottom to neutralize the torque (as the radial decoupler is not aligned with the force vector from the engine), and the diagonal strut to transfer the thrust from the booster to the hard point on the main stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...