Jump to content

Dump Truck to Orbit


Recommended Posts

So my challenge is simple.

Get a 80 ton 300 part dump truck into any orbit around Kerbin without mods. Have fun! I really want to see if somebody can do it :confused:

Get the dump truck from here:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be tempted to one-up above who does this and put it up in Realism Overhaul or similar.

 

Hmm... I should make a realism light pack. Basically .cfg mods that make everything as realistic as possible without needing to install such a heavyweight modpack as R.O.

Edited by Pds314
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Pds314 said:

Hmm... I should make a realism light pack. Basically .cfg mods that make everything as realistic as possible without needing to install such a heavyweight modpack as R.O.

SMURFF does a pretty good job of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Challenge Accepted

I used an over-engineered skycrane to lift it to a very sub-optimal orbit around Kerbin before arranging a rendezvous with the Mun, and expertly landed it.
please note that I do have informational and other aestetic mods installed, but I'm using all stock parts, stock SAS and no mechjeb auto-pilot.
the 600+ parts
used lagged my computer while recording the video so I had to edit it for time; the 124 minutes it took to land was cut down to less than 10.
 

 

Edited by Xyphos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DoctorDavinci said:

80 tons to orbit isn't that difficult

It isn't always about difficulty.  Some things just need to be put into space.

It's a moral imperative.

 

Clearly, great minds think alike, because I had also determined that the Mun is in desperate need of large dump truck.

Notes:

  • Apparently, it has a probe core in there.  I hadn't bothered including solar panels or anything, so I ended up having to burn in often-random directions every time I needed to charge the batteries to maneuver.  That was a big annoying.
  • Confirmed: Air-breathing Wheesly jet engines are not an optimal mode of propulsion on the Mun.  We've done science!
  • The bed seems have challenges in low gravity environments.
  • The plow seems to work fine on the Mun, though.

Verdict:

Good times had by all.

  srtno4E.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like some of you clearly deserve your gold star :cool:

I will need to release my next version with some rocket thrusters for driving in a vacuum. My next version should rectify this problem with the bed in low-G environments.

Also each individual part has a probe core inside so that they don't get deleted from the game once all the hinge parts get decoupled from the base vehicle. 

and ah Xyphos you should have looked at the action groups for using the hydraulics. You just forgot to detach those decouplers for the hinges that would allow things to rotate :(

So anyways anyone who says 80 tons to orbit is easy? Maybe I should make a challenge to send up a 140 ton version once I release it? It's only really a change in size and weight. This new one will actually have a lower base part count.

5CCDF33D1AC93842088893ECAE62A9309726DA30

Edited by Jon144
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jon144 said:

I will need to release my next version with some rocket thrusters for driving in a vacuum. My next version should rectify this problem with the bed in low-G environments.

That would be awesome.

The current version would work on Laythe, but I think I have other places that are in need of this as well.  Actually, I know I have other places that are in need of this.  For reasons.

Quote

Also each individual part has a probe core inside so that they don't get deleted from the game once all the hinge parts get decoupled from the base vehicle. 

That explains how quickly the power drained whenever I wasn't burning.  Good to know.

Edited by Vim Razz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vim Razz said:

That would be awesome.

The current version would work on Laythe, but I think I have other places that are in need of this as well.  Actually, I know I have other places that are in need of this.  For reasons.

That explains how quickly the power drained whenever I wasn't burning.  Good to know.

Especially since the jet engines are supposed to be the main source of electricity generation which surprise don't work in a vacuum :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jon144 said:

Xyphos you should have looked at the action groups for using the hydraulics. You just forgot to detach those decouplers for the hinges that would allow things to rotate :(

So anyways anyone who says 80 tons to orbit is easy?

YEAH, I realized after I landed it that I should have looked at the instruction manual, but that's just how things go; "I'm an Engineer, I don't need instructions!"
80 tons is easy, I personally have a 1002-ton SSTO spaceplane, I'll make a video of it later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Xyphos said:

YEAH, I realized after I landed it that I should have looked at the instruction manual, but that's just how things go; "I'm an Engineer, I don't need instructions!"
80 tons is easy, I personally have a 1002-ton SSTO spaceplane, I'll make a video of it later.

Would 140 tons to orbit be as easy? I would love to see an SSTO fly up to orbit with a giant truck strapped on it's back.

Edited by Jon144
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jon144 said:

Would 140 tons to orbit be as easy? I would love to see an SSTO fly up to orbit with a giant truck strapped on it's back.

tbh...  It doesn't make a huge difference.  At a certain point, "getting payload X to location Y' becomes more of a chore than a challenge. 

The fun thing about this thread is that the truck itself is such an amazing build, not the technical elements of moving it from one place to another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, "getting X mass to destination Y" isn't really a problem, it's keeping the cost and part count minimal that is. 140 tons, 1400 tons, even 14000 tons all can get to orbit, but it gets quite expensive, in both kredits and komputation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Xyphos said:

Yeah, "getting X mass to destination Y" isn't really a problem, it's keeping the cost and part count minimal that is. 140 tons, 1400 tons, even 14000 tons all can get to orbit, but it gets quite expensive, in both kredits and komputation.

Well weight and mass is one thing but not ever being designed to fly is another ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jon144 said:

Well weight and mass is one thing but not ever being designed to fly is another ^_^

I'll have to download 1.1 for the performance increase so I can show you my 900+ ton stock VTOL SSTO spaceplane with all the bells and whistles. the 300+ parts lag it to hell tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...