Jump to content

[1.2, 1.3] KW Rocketry Redux 3.1.1.1 released

linuxgurugamer

By linuxgurugamer
in KSP1 Mod Releases

 Share

Recommended Posts

Rabada

Rabada

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ive found a minor typo in one of the .cfgs for this mod. I've noticed that one of extra parts in the OldFARFairings folder is misplaced in the tech tree. I assume that both the regular and the expanded 2.5m fairing cones were meant to be unlocked with the Supersonic flight tech.

Line 19  in the part2m.cfg in the KW12mFairingCone folder is this: 

TechRequired = flightControl

when it should be 

TechRequired = supersonicFlight

Edit: I am running community Tech tree if that affects anything.

Edited by Rabada
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chiendv

Chiendv

Posted
Posted

Hi, Thanks for great mod.

but when I upgrade to 1.1.2 I got kw2mtankl1b part missing. I had tried delete and install this mod from fresh (from CKAN and gitHub) but no luck.

Could you take to look? Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jordanjay29

jordanjay29

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Chiendv said:

Hi, Thanks for great mod.

but when I upgrade to 1.1.2 I got kw2mtankl1b part missing. I had tried delete and install this mod from fresh (from CKAN and gitHub) but no luck.

Could you take to look? Thanks

I was having similar problems. Double check that your Module Manager is at the updated version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chiendv

Chiendv

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, jordanjay29 said:

I was having similar problems. Double check that your Module Manager is at the updated version.

Maybe that is mine problem. I was get it working by delete and re-install all of the mods.

One more time, Thank @linuxgurugamer for very useful and clear mod

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
On 5/4/2016 at 4:45 PM, Rabada said:

Ive found a minor typo in one of the .cfgs for this mod. I've noticed that one of extra parts in the OldFARFairings folder is misplaced in the tech tree. I assume that both the regular and the expanded 2.5m fairing cones were meant to be unlocked with the Supersonic flight tech.

Line 19  in the part2m.cfg in the KW12mFairingCone folder is this: 


TechRequired = flightControl

when it should be 


TechRequired = supersonicFlight

Edit: I am running community Tech tree if that affects anything.

That isn't a typo, but it may be a config change.

I'm making the change, but not going to release right now.

 

Thanks

Edited by linuxgurugamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deimos Rast

Deimos Rast

Posted
Posted

@linuxgurugamer

Small typo:

Wildcat XR Engine (3.75m) part name is "KW3mengineWildcarXR" instead of cat, yet the patch (KWPatch.cfg) points to the correct spelling of "KW3mengineWildcatXR".

Cheers (thanks again for all your work on this mod and all the others, it forms the back bone of my armada).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Deimos Rast said:

@linuxgurugamer

Small typo:

Wildcat XR Engine (3.75m) part name is "KW3mengineWildcarXR" instead of cat, yet the patch (KWPatch.cfg) points to the correct spelling of "KW3mengineWildcatXR".

Cheers (thanks again for all your work on this mod and all the others, it forms the back bone of my armada).

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
edemlama

edemlama

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, linuxgurugamer said:

Craft file, list of all installed mods are needed.

Thanks

 

Here is a link to a folder with the KSP log, craft file and a screenshot of all my mods:

https://mega.nz/#F!vxFiBKhJ!QXb0J_6oVFLYZqHhPdOysg

Here is also a link to a video of how the fins behave during flight before snapping off:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYcpBcUUMaw

Thanks for the help 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just released 3.0.5

-Fixed techrequired for the KW12mFairingCone
-Fixed typo in 3mWildcatXR/part.cfg
-Fixed MM patch to avoid problems when FAR isn't installed.  FOR makes ModuleManager think that the mod exists (should be NEEDS). Also added to the KWRocketry pass.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eskandare

Eskandare

Posted
Posted

I ran into this... 

(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

RCSBlock added to ship - part count: 83
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Clearing undo states from #24 forward (1 entries)
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Cannot find fx group of that name for decoupler
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

deleting part KW3mFairingPFE
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Cannot find fx group of that name for decoupler
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Cannot find fx group of that name for decoupler
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

deleting part KW2mFairingPFE
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Crash!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Eskandare said:

I ran into this... 


(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

RCSBlock added to ship - part count: 83
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Clearing undo states from #24 forward (1 entries)
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Cannot find fx group of that name for decoupler
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

deleting part KW3mFairingPFE
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Cannot find fx group of that name for decoupler
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Cannot find fx group of that name for decoupler
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

deleting part KW2mFairingPFE
 
(Filename: C:/buildslave/unity/build/artifacts/generated/common/runtime/UnityEngineDebugBindings.gen.cpp Line: 64)

Crash!!!

 

A little more info, please. The complete log would be helpful, as well as the craft file and/or description of the ship.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Turk_WLF

Turk_WLF

Posted
Posted
On ‎5‎/‎7‎/‎2016 at 5:00 AM, Saylorock93 said:

What about engines becoming red hot for no reason in vab?

Is there a patch/fix for this? Because I also have the same problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deimos Rast

Deimos Rast

Posted
Posted

I get the decoupler fx bug on every decoupler, and I don;t even use KW rocketry decouplers.

Also, I've never seen the engine bug in the VAB, but it reminds me of decouplers firing off  their effects when something in their configs is borked and you're getting NRE spam. Best I can think of. Should probably post a log.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 5/14/2016 at 11:46 PM, linuxgurugamer said:

A little more info, please. The complete log would be helpful, as well as the craft file and/or description of the ship.

Thanks

The message "Cannot find fx group of that name for decoupler"  is likely from code that used to work one way in 0.21 or something, and no longer works that way, but the line is still there for that part and therefore you get a warning. It can probably be ignored in THIS case. It looks like the some of the fairing don't even have the  fx group.

I'll work on adding it, for now, just ignore those messages

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
21 minutes ago, linuxgurugamer said:

The message "Cannot find fx group of that name for decoupler"  is likely from code that used to work one way in 0.21 or something, and no longer works that way, but the line is still there for that part and therefore you get a warning. It can probably be ignored in THIS case. It looks like the some of the fairing don't even have the  fx group.

I'll work on adding it, for now, just ignore those messages

I just released 3.0.7 which fixes these messages.

Now, when I load a game with KW, there aren't any of those messages in the log.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Drew Kerman

Drew Kerman

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, linuxgurugamer said:

I just released 3.0.7 which fixes these messages.

Now, when I load a game with KW, there aren't any of those messages in the log.

What was the fix? This is a common benign error I see from a lot of mods I'd like to patch up myself so I don't have to keep ignoring them while searching the log for new errors

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 hours ago, Gaiiden said:

What was the fix? This is a common benign error I see from a lot of mods I'd like to patch up myself so I don't have to keep ignoring them while searching the log for new errors

From the changelog:

    - Added missing FX info to some fairings
    - Renamed FX from deploy to decouple in some fairings

The following lines were either missing or had an old name:

    fx_gasBurst_white = 0.0, 0.3, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, decouple
    sound_vent_large = decouple

KW had the old status of "deploy" instead of "decouple"

You can read more about the FX definitions at this page: http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/CFG_File_Documentation#FX_definitions

Keep in mind that this documentation is old, and is not totally accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...