blackheart612

[1.4.x-1.6.x] Airplane Plus - R26.0 (A lot of fixes) (Mar 21, 2019)

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sebastiaz said:

Is there any chance of Airplane Plus R23.0 working with 1.3.1, for any of us 1.3.1 players?

Theoretically, it should work with 1.3.1 as long as you have the right plug-ins (The 1.4.x-1.4.4 is due to FS and module manager version). Does it not for you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I think there's a error on the .version file. The URL is not pointing to a remote .version file. 

{
  "NAME": "Airplane Plus",
  "URL": "https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/140262-131-airplane-plus-r200-supersonic-6-retractable-landing-gears-jan-23-2018/",
  "VERSION": {
    "MAJOR": 23,
    "MINOR": 0,
    "PATCH": 0
  },
     "KSP_VERSION":{
         "MAJOR":1,
         "MINOR":4,
         "PATCH":4
     },
     "KSP_VERSION_MIN":{
         "MAJOR":1,
         "MINOR":2,
         "PATCH":9
     },
     "KSP_VERSION_MAX":{
         "MAJOR":1,
         "MINOR":4,
         "PATCH":4
     }
}

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, blackheart612 said:

Theoretically, it should work with 1.3.1 as long as you have the right plug-ins (The 1.4.x-1.4.4 is due to FS and module manager version). Does it not for you?

About to do it just now, last update when I tried it, there was an issue with after pressing a cockpit, (Any cockpit) on the toolbar, the toolbar become unresponsive as in unable to click on any parts, deleted the helicopter parts and it soon after worked, unless that was a bug on 1.4 users to. So I'm just going to try this update now, I'll get back to you after trying it out. ^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Lisias said:

Hi. I think there's a error on the .version file. The URL is not pointing to a remote .version file. 


{
  "NAME": "Airplane Plus",
  "URL": "https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/140262-131-airplane-plus-r200-supersonic-6-retractable-landing-gears-jan-23-2018/",
  "VERSION": {
    "MAJOR": 23,
    "MINOR": 0,
    "PATCH": 0
  },
     "KSP_VERSION":{
         "MAJOR":1,
         "MINOR":4,
         "PATCH":4
     },
     "KSP_VERSION_MIN":{
         "MAJOR":1,
         "MINOR":2,
         "PATCH":9
     },
     "KSP_VERSION_MAX":{
         "MAJOR":1,
         "MINOR":4,
         "PATCH":4
     }
}

 

Believe it or not, I have no idea how .version files are supposed to work, I was just told to make one :P Is this game breaking?

3 minutes ago, Sebastiaz said:

About to do it just now, last update when I tried it, there was an issue with after pressing a cockpit, (Any cockpit) on the toolbar, the toolbar become unresponsive as in unable to click on any parts, deleted the helicopter parts and it soon after worked, unless that was a bug on 1.4 users to. So I'm just going to try this update now, I'll get back to you after trying it out. ^^

Hmmm, alright. If you do encounter issues, you can just tell them here so we can try to fix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, blackheart612 said:

Believe it or not, I have no idea how .version files are supposed to work, I was just told to make one :P Is this game breaking?

Nops. But allow the KSP-AVC and MiniAVC to detect new versions and check compatibility with the installment.

The way it is, it just make a request on the forum for nothing - it's better not to use this way, as it would delay a bit the startup and add load to the forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Lisias said:

Nops. But allow the KSP-AVC and MiniAVC to detect new versions and check compatibility with the installment.

The way it is, it just make a request on the forum for nothing - it's better not to use this way, as it would delay a bit the startup and add load to the forum.

Hmmm, alright. I really have no idea about it, how does one go about fixing this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, blackheart612 said:

 

Hmmm, alright. If you do encounter issues, you can just tell them here so we can try to fix.

Right, I've tested on 1.3.1 with just Airplane Plus and Firespitter, etc. It works very well! There is one slight issue though with the 1.5m parts, one of the issues is this:

6UjSLE2.png

There is a flickering issue with the 1.875m Liquid Fuel Fuselage, it is also unclickable if you don't connect it to a part. Other than that, everything so far is working soundly. :D

Edit: May aswell say now, any chance of an SU-27-esque cockpit? ^^

Edited by Sebastiaz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, blackheart612 said:

Hmmm, alright. I really have no idea about it, how does one go about fixing this?

Something like this:

{
  "NAME": "Airplane Plus",
  "DOWNLOAD": "https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/140262-131-airplane-plus-r200-supersonic-6-retractable-landing-gears-jan-23-2018/",
  "URL": "<some url to a remote .version file>",
[SNIP]

Since you are not using GitHub or something, you can create a login here if order to publish a .version, as in this example.

Edited by Lisias

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Sebastiaz said:

Right, I've tested on 1.3.1 with just Airplane Plus and Firespitter, etc. It works very well! There is one slight issue though with the 1.5m parts, one of the issues is this:

6UjSLE2.png

There is a flickering issue with the 1.875m Liquid Fuel Fuselage, it is also unclickable if you don't connect it to a part. Other than that, everything so far is working soundly. :D

I fixed this on my dev version already! *stomps on the ground repeatedly*. This is so infuriating :( 

 

Edit: @Lisias So it needs github?

Edited by blackheart612

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, blackheart612 said:

I fixed this on my dev version already! *stomps on the ground repeatedly*. This is so infuriating :( 

 

 

Hey, at least you know now, once again. :D 

Edited by Sebastiaz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, blackheart612 said:

Edit: @Lisias So it needs github?

No. You can use anything that can download a text file from.

Examples:

http://ksp-avc.cybutek.net/version.php?id=538
https://ksp.lisias.net/add-ons/UbioWeldContinuum.version

and also github:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxgurugamer/MemGraph/master/MemGraph.version

(GitHub is a little tricky, as you can't change the .version file on master while developing without triggering false update alarms on everybody - if you don't use GitHub already, I don't think it worths just due this)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Sebastiaz said:

Hey, at least you know now, once again. :D 

 

21 minutes ago, Lisias said:

No. You can use anything that can download a text file from.

Examples:

http://ksp-avc.cybutek.net/version.php?id=538
https://ksp.lisias.net/add-ons/UbioWeldContinuum.version

and also github:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxgurugamer/MemGraph/master/MemGraph.version

(GitHub is a little tricky, as you can't change the .version file on master while developing without triggering false update alarms on everybody - if you don't use GitHub already, I don't think it worths just due this)

Alright, I'm sneaking in a nother re-upload. I fixed the issue regarding the 1.875m fuel tank and used a .version from ksp avc. :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

congrats @blackheart612 on another great installment of your mod. 

What is that wingroot there I see on the pictures? The part buried inside the fuselage? I can't seem to find it in the VAB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@blackheart612 The mechanism for that passenger door looks suspiciously like mine. Is that a coincidence? Also a little fun fact, your CF34 has more thrust than the real thing.

NlMxL2E.png

On a more serious not though. It does not seem you have airlock colliers working for the 1.875m passenger cabins. There is also some z-fighting between structural tubes on the inside, probably needs a little bit of a bevel there, like on the outside.

I have not bothered checking drag cubes, since you say you have not done anything with them. Also something I noticed, that you might consider changing. The floors in the 1.875m hollow parts and the mk3s1.5 does not line up, which would be neat if they did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Daniel Prates Thank you, the "root" wing is a 3-parter, it's composed of the FAT wing set.

@neistridlar Trust me, I've done every way I could to have a variety of opening the door if you check the Mk1, it's based on the Citation Business Jets, the Size 2 is both for general Airline Design and Lockheed Airstair. Now I have nothing else I can think of but that. Let's settle that the Bombardier type door is like how we made it. :P

I though I tested the 1.875m cabins already... I need to recheck it. The floors on my hollow parts don't usually line up but that would be neat, yeah, I don't know, we'll see. The CF34 is actually not performanced based on the CF34 but a middle ground between Size 0 and Mk1 engines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, blackheart612 said:

the "root" wing is a 3-parter, it's composed of the FAT wing set.

Tks!  But I think I didnt explain well. I was asking about the protruding volume, on the actual fuselage. The bulge,  onto where the wing is rooted. Not the actual lifting surface part. 

Edited by Daniel Prates

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Daniel Prates said:

Tks!  But I think I didnt explain well. I was asking about the protruding volume, on the actual fuselage. The bulge,  onto where the wing is rooted. Not the actual lifting surface part. 

Ah, that would be the Size 2 Radial Liquid Fuel Mount :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Dre4dW0rm said:

CKAN download is broken, the uploaded file is corrupted.

Probably because of the 2 reuploads, I don't know how to fix CKAN issues though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, blackheart612 said:

Probably because of the 2 reuploads, I don't know how to fix CKAN issues though...

From the CKAN thread (I posted the issue over there)
 

This is because the original download was replaced, and CKAN is expecting it to match the one that was originally indexed. To fix this we'll need to contact our server admin to purge that file out of the cache of the NetKAN bot, although when this has happened recently it has been more common for the author to fix it by releasing a new version instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.