HebaruSan Posted October 25, 2020 Share Posted October 25, 2020 7 minutes ago, IonStorm said: Those scenes were never accurate. Yeah, I tried to cover that with "yet another thing", implying that there was already a lot wrong with them. Too subtle, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted October 25, 2020 Share Posted October 25, 2020 10 minutes ago, HebaruSan said: Yeah, I tried to cover that with "yet another thing", implying that there was already a lot wrong with them. Too subtle, I guess. No, just being explicit for the lurkers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wumpus Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 3 hours ago, HebaruSan said: If it does turn out to be typical, that's yet another thing that needs to be fixed about sci fi "asteroid field" scenes... Reveal hidden contents ... at the very least we need big clouds of fine material dispersed on impact; maybe the TIE fighters would even survive! We've known since Voyager (or possibly Pioneer) that "dodging asteroids" was far easier than dodging satellites in LEO. I think the ISS has had to maneuver to avoid a near miss multiple times. I don't think any spacecraft has had to dodge an asteroid (and most of them can't and make it through). It would make the classic video game "Asteroids" a lot less fun if a single shot turned a "large" asteroid into a fine mist small rocks, although I suspect the "boulders" such as Mount Doom are in fact actual boulders. I don't think we can tell from Osiris Rex's data, but it would be great if we did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HebaruSan Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 4 minutes ago, wumpus said: We've known since Voyager (or possibly Pioneer) that "dodging asteroids" was far easier than dodging satellites in LEO. See the above three comments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shpaget Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 8 hours ago, IonStorm said: There are two gas bottles left, but only one sampling head and one sample return capsule. So the entire sampling head is put into the return capsule, as opposed to dumping samples out of the sampling head into the return capsule and leaving the head behind? I suppose dumping the samples would be tricky in zero G, anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 3 hours ago, Shpaget said: So the entire sampling head is put into the return capsule, as opposed to dumping samples out of the sampling head into the return capsule and leaving the head behind? I suppose dumping the samples would be tricky in zero G, anyway. Yes. Plus we want all the adhering dust and the material on the contact pads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 (edited) Then proven tools are the best. Doesn't need a power source. Collects dust from any surface. A must-have in space. Edited October 27, 2020 by kerbiloid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubinator Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Wouldn't you like to put the whole asteroid in a bag and land it on Earth... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 50 minutes ago, cubinator said: Wouldn't you like to put the whole asteroid in a bag and land it on Earth... No. One of mission objectives is get data not to let Bennu land on Earth in 2175-2199 . But, several tonnes from different locations and depths would be illuminating. However, I'll be quite content with a TAGSAM head overflowing with regolith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubinator Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 1 hour ago, IonStorm said: No. One of mission objectives is get data not to let Bennu land on Earth in 2175-2199 . But, several tonnes from different locations and depths would be illuminating. However, I'll be quite content with a TAGSAM head overflowing with regolith. Well, Mars then? Warm up the poles a little? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 (edited) 8 hours ago, IonStorm said: However, I'll be quite content with a TAGSAM head overflowing with regolith. With the overflowing amount of samples upon re-entry (which being a Utahn I can't wait for.) is there a chance that the overflowing amount might cause an anomaly in the capsule? Or is the inside of the capsule separated by all the things that preform the tasks on re-entry? Also it's super cool that you have a forum account. It's nice to have a space craft engineer here on the forums. 7 hours ago, cubinator said: Well, Mars then? Warm up the poles a little? chuckles, I don't think there is a possibility of getting it there. Edited October 28, 2020 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 9 minutes ago, The Doodling Astronaut said: With the overflowing amount of samples upon re-entry (which being a Utahn I can't wait for.) is there a chance that the overflowing amount might cause an anomaly in the capsule? Or is the inside of the capsule separated by all the things that preform the tasks on re-entry? Also it's super cool that you have a forum account. It's nice to have a space craft engineer here on the forums. chucles, I don't think there is a possibility of getting it there. The sample return capsule (SRC) is designed to have a separate compartment for the TAGSAM head from the electronics and parachute. In the below picture (Bierhaus et al. 2018) on the right you can see the capture ring on which the TAGSAM head sits. When the lid closes the compartment with the sample is dust-tight. We anticipated that there would be loose material, particularly during spacecraft operations and re-entry, so this is within the scope of testing. The SRC will land in the Utah Test and Training Range in Dugway, UT at 8:40am MDT on September 24, 2023. Also, I'm actually not an engineer, but a scientist (Ph.D. in biochemistry). There are a few others here. The deputy PI of the Dragonfly mission is active on the forums. I've been playing KSP since v0.10.1 (who remembers the Overthrottle light?), but I don't have a lot to time to play and less time for the forums, except for this thread. As it happens, I gave a short on OSIRIS-REx overview talk today with a colleague at https://www.ustream.tv/recorded/128367108, if you want some additional details on the mission. And yes, you are correct getting Bennu to Mars would take an awful lot of energy. The orbital diagram you show from the day before the OSIRIS-REx launch from the old JPL Small Body Database Browser doesn't even give a sense of the inclination change needed. The new version of the diagram is easier to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 The sample container is dust tight, is it also gas tight? What about volatiles? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 8 hours ago, tater said: The sample container is dust tight, is it also gas tight? What about volatiles? The SRC is not a pressure vessel, that would require a lot more mass. However, the vent to atmosphere is through a filter. You can see it in panel b in the figure in my previous post above the ne in witness as a circle in the top of the internal canister. It will be analyzed for trapped volatiles. See section 7.2-7.6 of Dworkin et al. 2018 if you want details of what is trapped at what efficiency in lab testing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 (edited) The sample is stowed. https://www.asteroidmission.org/?latest-news=osiris-rex-in-the-midst-of-stow Note the specks of Bennu dust from TAG on the white square in the bottom left (an OCAMS Radiator). Edited October 29, 2020 by IonStorm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.50calBMG Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Do you have any sense as to how much sample you were able retain after the tag? Is there a way to measure that in the return capsule? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 1 minute ago, .50calBMG said: Do you have any sense as to how much sample you were able retain after the tag? Is there a way to measure that in the return capsule? There are a range of models and there is hope to be able to use some of arm motions to generate an estimate. The top priority was getting the sample safely stored. That done we can try to look at the data and refine the models. Though, since we will know for sure in three years and there is nothing we can do with the result other than improve our sample allocation and curation plans, it isn't clear that devoting a lot of engineering time for analysis is necessary now (though it would be interesting). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubinator Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 3 hours ago, IonStorm said: There are a range of models and there is hope to be able to use some of arm motions to generate an estimate. The top priority was getting the sample safely stored. That done we can try to look at the data and refine the models. Though, since we will know for sure in three years and there is nothing we can do with the result other than improve our sample allocation and curation plans, it isn't clear that devoting a lot of engineering time for analysis is necessary now (though it would be interesting). I just want to see you guys bring the sample home safe. You know you've got a big container full of rock, and it's finally safely sealed up, so we can all wait to put it on a nice measuring scale back on Earth. That said, what's the maximum mass of rock that would be in the sample head if it was perfectly full? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HebaruSan Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 13 minutes ago, cubinator said: container full of rock Asterisk, possibly very loose dust. Makes me wonder how much more could have been learned in this instance from directly observing the site as the collection occurred. And are there any images of the hole left behind taken on the way out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 7 hours ago, cubinator said: I just want to see you guys bring the sample home safe. You know you've got a big container full of rock, and it's finally safely sealed up, so we can all wait to put it on a nice measuring scale back on Earth. That said, what's the maximum mass of rock that would be in the sample head if it was perfectly full? It depends on the density you assume. A reasonable number is about 2kg. 6 hours ago, HebaruSan said: Asterisk, possibly very loose dust. Makes me wonder how much more could have been learned in this instance from directly observing the site as the collection occurred. And are there any images of the hole left behind taken on the way out? It would be nice to go back and look at the site. Lots to learn, but that comes at a cost: in both money and risk. With a collected sample, unfortunately it isn’t worth it. Two differences from KSP: no F9 and operating a spacecraft also takes funds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealKerbal3x Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 1 minute ago, tater said: "Experiment Storage Unit: All items stored" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannu2 Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 On 10/29/2020 at 1:54 PM, IonStorm said: It would be nice to go back and look at the site. Lots to learn, but that comes at a cost: in both money and risk. With a collected sample, unfortunately it isn’t worth it. Two differences from KSP: no F9 and operating a spacecraft also takes funds. Did you already leave from Bennu permanently? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonStorm Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 49 minutes ago, Hannu2 said: Did you already leave from Bennu permanently? Yes. After the “large” 40cm/s burn to leave the TAG site, the spacecraft is still drifting away from Bennu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.