Jump to content

"Debunker" says Falcon 9 does not go into space.


Scotius

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, JPLRepo said:

Click bait. Nothing more: nothing less. You click YouTube pays them. I won't be clicking.

Nah. They only get payed for ads. If you have Add Blocker, it's perfectly safe to click these links.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Raging Sandwich said:

I like how these sort of people disable the comments because they are afraid of someone disagreeing and "offending" them.

Disabling of the comments was previously a telltale sigh of crackpottery and tinfoil-hattedness, but just the other day I realized that one channel that I considered rational and usually open for constructive criticism and dialogue disabled their comment section on all their videos. While I, most certainly, don't agree with the practice of blocking comments, I understand the motive. 

The comment section of Youtube is filled with toxic bile, regardless of the content of the video, so it's hard to find and conduct intelligent conversation there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shpaget said:

Disabling of the comments was previously a telltale sigh of crackpottery and tinfoil-hattedness, but just the other day I realized that one channel that I considered rational and usually open for constructive criticism and dialogue disabled their comment section on all their videos. While I, most certainly, don't agree with the practice of blocking comments, I understand the motive. 

The comment section of Youtube is filled with toxic bile, regardless of the content of the video, so it's hard to find and conduct intelligent conversation there.

But which is better: conversation filled with vitriol or no conversation at all? Internet is all about communication. If this communication is one - sided we have something not much better than a paper magazine or TV news program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Scotius said:

But which is better: conversation filled with vitriol or no conversation at all? Internet is all about communication. If this communication is one - sided we have something not much better than a paper magazine or TV news program.

Exactly, that's why I said that I don't agree with the practice of blocking comments. I, personally, can cope with unbased and low level insults and provocation. They don't hurt me at all, and when I get bored of them I can always leave. Some people don't want to tread in that cesspool and as content creators, the owners of the channel can't just leave and not respond without giving another, different, approach to attack.

In their defense, they have another website (that is linked to on every video) where you can and are invited to comment, but that is just not as straightforward as direct comments under the video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, K^2 said:

Nah. They only get payed for ads. If you have Add Blocker, it's perfectly safe to click these links.

Not really. The old 301 views freze bug says otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12.8.2016 at 5:00 PM, Firemetal said:

I have two words for you. It's a joke.

Joke and / or trolling, some pole enjoy making stuff like this. Saw one there I girl was playing very stupid, she was so happy as sharging fixed her broken mobile phone, and she was afraid we would run out of gravity if we kept taking advantage of it. 
However they tend to leave the comments on too see how many falls for it

On the other hand its plenty of people who believe the Apollo landing was fake. Doing so would be way harder than actually landing on the Moon.
And yes somehow covering up falcon9 launches would be harder, too many sources, how about all the them who had satellites launched with falcon9? 
More fun it should be pretty easy to spot an dragon in orbit from release to dock with ISS. 
In short, if you want an conspiracy make one who is hard to disprove, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2016 at 4:30 AM, Scotius said:

Watch and weep. Or laugh hysterically. This guy had me in stitches at: "Look at this! This rocket flies parallel to the ground. It's not going to space". Someone does not know how ascent and orbital mechanics work :) Also there is a "model" of Falcon 9 that you must see for yourself. Of course comments are disabled, so there is no way to tell this guy how dumb it is. So, yeah - just pure entertainment.

Talk is cheap. Its just the demeanor of the individual is, well lets just say like people I have run into to the past that have social problems (tend not to hold jobs well, etc).

Edited by PB666
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2016 at 0:31 PM, Elthy said:

Lol, who would pay for that? All the flat earth guys and those saying mankind never traveled to space are just insane, something is wrong in their heads. Simply ignore them, except they somehow get power, then fight them at any means...

some powerful groups want the general population to remain stupid and clueless, so paying conspiracy theorists to create these hoaxes works great for them. Don't even have to pay them much, far cheaper than setting up your own propaganda machine with paid employees, studios, props departments, etc. (though they have Hollywood to fill that role of course, "ancient aliens" anyone?).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jwenting said:

some powerful groups want the general population to remain stupid and clueless, so paying conspiracy theorists to create these hoaxes works great for them. Don't even have to pay them much, far cheaper than setting up your own propaganda machine with paid employees, studios, props departments, etc. (though they have Hollywood to fill that role of course, "ancient aliens" anyone?).

How fantastically meta. Conspiracy theorists are all in the pay of .... a conspiracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frozen_Heart said:

Why is this thread still going?

Also isn't talking conspiracy theories against the rules?

exposing them as such isn't... And the "SpaceX doesn't actually launch anything" hoax is just that, even if not everyone who falls for it recognises it as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Talos said:

Poe's law really comes to mind here.

First thought of Edgar Alan Poe and scratched my head. But when i searched i found the name-giving Poe. Of course I know the effect but didn't know it has a name.

:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...