Jump to content

How many things do you use the wrong way?


322997am

Recommended Posts

1. My r&d is an airport in my best and only sandbox save.

2. I use ion engines as electric fans for kerbals

3. I build houses from structural plates

4. The island airfield is another airport.

5. I use the destroyed mission control for rock climbing practice

6.i build fighter jets with no weapons.

7. I stuff kerbals in service bays from rescue missions.

post your stuff like that below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrLicor said:

i had to gniffle a bit about those poor kerbals you try to rescue

Do they prefer to be in orbit for the rest of their lives? Or be treated like junk for 15 minutes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chiron0224 said:

Have you heard of probe cores?

It's a valid technique from an engineering standpoint, even with a probe core.  Service bay is a lot lighter than a crewed pod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chiron0224 said:

Right, my point being that you can send an empty capsule with a probe core instead of using a service bay.

But a service bay is funner.

And lighter.

But mostly funner.

EDIT: "Funner" is too a word!

Edited by 5thHorseman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I started, I did not know how to stage properly, and sometimes I accidently fail to update the staging when I add seperatrons and they end up going off while I'm launching.

I've also at one point built a rocket, then used the big booster engines instead of something that fit the small size of the rocket. Needless to say, it blew up from going way too fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, pandaman said:

If it works then it's not 'the wrong way', it's inventive use of the available resources.

I'm sure the Apollo 13 crew were more than happy to use stuff for purposes for which it was not originally designed. 

"I don't care about what anything was DESIGNED to do, I care about what it CAN do."  - Gene Kranz, Apollo 13 movie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Snark said:

I've seen people use the Communotron-16 antenna as a cheap, lightweight landing leg for small probes.

Guilty as charged.

SAVUqzE.png

Separatrons used as extra parachutes. (throttled to TWR of 0.95, so the only parachute carries 5% of the probe's mass during the final phase of landing).

I also used cargo bay ramps as heavyweight landing legs.

VkdR6EC.jpg

Cargo bays as medium-heavy landing legs. Also, MK3 structural plates upside down.

gNa7gIR.jpg
Aerospike engines and Rockomax HubMax as really heavyweight RCS thruster blocks.

AgFsdGA.png

Mk3 parts as wheels. (seriously, that thing traveled good 4km on its belly like this, before reaching the ridge and finally taking off...)

xgzzCP9.png

KAS pipes as dragster structure

ASLD3ro.png

Airplane chines as structural core of spy satellites.

yjExHX5.png

Airbrakes as landing legs.

This is a bad idea. When the vehicle loads, airbrakes start 'retracted' and only play the extension animation then. If you are landed, that means they will load inside the ground and explode.

Nevertheless, took me some time before I learned this is a bad idea.

Also, Spiders in role of anchor for low-gravity environment (pointed upwards).

eUJeGwb.png

This setup... ISRU, Reliants, drills, nuclear reactors - as fireworks generators. (the Reliants are permanently starved for fuel and play the flameout animation non-stop)

FqyRpQT.png

Launch clamps, to keep the base from jumping when physics glitches.

4uUx5uD.png

 

KAS winches as aerial cables for a power line.

q3A7EOp.png

Spent transfer stages as...

IIVRA3u.png

KSP's custom Unity shader of KSP Particle Emitter (normally used for generating engine exhaust) to simulate Cherenkov Radiation...

Y6ZEx8p.png

Spider engines as gimbals/hinges for vehicle suspension and cargo ramps.

VES4yLV.png

X6AzRIs.png

...and the deployable, Spider-hinged cargo ramp as a trampoline.

XkOXZS5.png

 

Also, taco for mass balancing rockets, Surface Science cables for installation connecting industrial machinery of the base, TNT to "decouple" drills from radiators.

On my TODO list:

- Jet engines as rover stabilizers (shifting CoM below ground level)

- Landing legs to (auto-)strut space base.

- RTG as lightweight landing legs. Actually, now that I think of it, I have one craft with these in flight.

- MK2, MK3 expansion and MK4 mods to build an alien temple-ship. I had a decent prototype already, but scrapped it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand what's wrong about any of those...

1. My first permanent job as a researcher was at NASA Ames, which is an airbase.

2. I use an ionizing air filter as a fan (and to clean up the air).

3. A friend build her house out of Structural Insulated Panels.

4. I land at the island to test whether my plane can land in a tricky spot, without having to fly halfway around the globe to find out that my stall speed is too high or landing gear is poorly place.

5. I've climbed on old structures plenty.

6. Fighter jets with no weapons would make for a better world.

7. Stuffing kerbals in service bays... well... ok, yes, that's a bit wrong :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really surprised to see that I know nothing about the different uses of parts in this game.

1 hour ago, numerobis said:

 

2. I use an ionizing air filter as a fan (and to clean up the air). -I don't suspect you'd be happy about a fan that blows ions in your face?

3. A friend build her house out of Structural Insulated Panels. - I really need to see this:0.0:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An ionizing air filter actually does blow ions -- of course, they don't stay ions for long. But one disadvantage of them over HEPA filters is that they put out ozone (an advantage is that you don't need to replace the filter).

As for SIP, let me google that for you: structural insulated panel. It's foam sandwiched between plywood boards. That composite has structural strength, and is highly insulated. And it comes in panels. Those construction industry people are no poets, but they do make good materials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure the structural plate wasn't intended for this kind of abuse:

Spoiler

screenshot45.png

Gravity very much hacked -- pretty sure this was a power draw test.

Likewise this is a completely unreasonable use case for the little tail fins:

Spoiler

screenshot38.png

In my defense, they have the best ratio of lift to mass of any aero part.

Finally, drained mk0 fuel tanks make the lightest structure per unit length, so I've taken to using them in place of girders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...