JoeSchmuckatelli Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 Back when Hubble (the astronomer) was doing his work, negatives were the norm. http://ircamera.as.arizona.edu/NatSci102/NatSci102/images/m33hub.jpg Here is one of Hubble's photographic plates of the center of M33, with Cepheid variables marked. If you look closely (and if the original resolution has been preserved from plate to journal to scanner to web page to your computer), you will see that the gray "nebulosity" is broken up into little specks that are individual stars. (The plate is a negative, as was the convention for publishing results -- the stars look black and the sky white) (From ApJ, 63, 236, 1926) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charley Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 On 12/27/2022 at 3:44 AM, JoeSchmuckatelli said: The James Webb Space Telescope resumed science operations Dec. 20, after Webb’s instruments intermittently went into safe mode beginning Dec. 7 due to a software fault triggered in the attitude control system -from the Blog I missed this information, I thought it was not published. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 This strange moment when the astrophysicists of the world dream of that post was not a joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 From these images (shown at left), the team searched for faint galaxies that are visible in the infrared but whose spectra abruptly cut off at a critical wavelength known as the Lyman break. Webb’s NIRSpec instrument then yielded a precise measurement of each galaxy’s redshift (shown at right). Four of the galaxies studied are particularly special, as they were revealed to be at an unprecedentedly early epoch. These galaxies date back to less than 400 million years after the big bang, when the universe was only 2% of its current age https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/01GKRX20YPY9XSXRWX31H57P2A Oh - and if you are wondering about the Lyman Break: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyman-break_galaxy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 Spiral galaxies from 11 billion years ago, way earlier than anticipated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted January 13, 2023 Share Posted January 13, 2023 (edited) These first observational results from an Earth-size, rocky planet open the door to many future possibilities for studying rocky planet atmospheres with Webb, The team observed LHS 475b as it transited twice in front of its host star, a red dwarf that the planet orbits every two days. The first transit occurred on Aug. 31, 2022, and the second one happened four days later, on Sept. 4. Lustig-Yaeger's team recorded that 0.1% of the star's light was being blocked by the planet over the course of its 40-minute transits. From that, the team calculated that the planet is almost the same size as Earth, with roughly 99% of its diameter. https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-first-rocket-exoplanet Edited January 13, 2023 by JoeSchmuckatelli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted January 14, 2023 Share Posted January 14, 2023 JWST keeps revealing weirder and weirder stuff about the universe. One galaxy is apparently traveling so fast relative to the others that it is generating a massive shock wave. Quote NGC 7318b, violently intrudes into the group at a relative speed of roughly 800 km/second. At that speed, a trip from Earth to the Moon would take just eight minutes. “As this intruder crashes into the group, it is colliding with an old gas streamer that likely was caused by a previous interaction between two of the other galaxies, and is causing a giant shockwave to form,” said Philip Appleton, an astronomer and senior scientist at Caltech’s IPAC, and lead investigator on the project. “As the shockwave passes through this clumpy streamer, it is creating a highly turbulent, or unsteady, cooling layer, and it’s in the regions affected by this violent activity that we’re seeing unexpected structures and the recycling of molecular hydrogen gas. This is important because molecular hydrogen forms the raw material that may ultimately form stars, so understanding its fate will tell us more about the evolution of Stephan’s Quintet and galaxies in general.” ALMA and JWST Reveal Galactic Shock is Shaping Stephan’s Quintet in Mysterious Ways - National Radio Astronomy Observatory (nrao.edu) Lighter fare article about the paper above: Webb Telescope Finds Massive Shock Wave Wreaking Havoc Among 5 Galaxies (msn.com) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farmerben Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted February 22, 2023 Share Posted February 22, 2023 Webb captured images of the six massive galaxies. One of them (bottom left) could contain as many stars as our Milky Way galaxy, but it is 30 times more compact "The revelation that massive galaxy formation began extremely early in the history of the universe upends what many of us had thought was settled science,” Leja said. “We’ve been informally calling these objects ‘universe breakers’ — and they have been living up to their name so far.” These objects are way more massive than anyone expected,” said study coauthor Joel Leja, assistant professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Penn State University, in a statement. “We expected only to find tiny, young, baby galaxies at this point in time, but we’ve discovered galaxies as mature as our own in what was previously understood to be the dawn of the universe.” The galaxies are so massive that they conflict with 99% of models representing early galaxies in the universe, which means scientists need to rethink how galaxies formed and evolved. The current theory suggests that galaxies began as small clouds of stars and dust that grew over time https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/22/world/webb-telescope-massive-early-galaxies-scn/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProtoJeb21 Posted February 26, 2023 Share Posted February 26, 2023 At the JWST Early Science Conference back in December, they teased the results for the sub-Neptune GJ 1214b. During a 38 hour long observation, JWST was able to observe the day side of the planet right before it passed behind its star and collect information on its atmospheric composition, which has been a pain to do for more than a decade due to a thick layer of clouds/hazes. The lead authors of this investigation said that they still have work to do on the data, but have found evidence for water and methane, and the data seems to show that the atmosphere is enriched in compounds heavier than hydrogen and helium. The planet's bulk density is compatible with either a H/He atmosphere over a rocky core and small water mantle or a gigantic water mantle with a steam atmosphere, and it seems to me that the preliminary JWST results are pointing towards the latter. I'm quite excited for the paper on this investigation. GJ 1214b was one of those early exoplanets that really got me excited about and into the field. Also GJ 1214b is one of twenty exoplanets targeted by JWST to be in the IAU's third NameExoWorlds campaign. Some of the name submissions are available on YouTube. Two Greek organizations submitted names (Laurus and Bellerophone), but only one name submission is accepted per country, so only one has made it to the ongoing final vote. Which one did is unknown. I do wish the IAU would allow multiple names per country because it didn't seem like there were a ton of good ones being submitted, and some planets may get more submissions than others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 luminous, hot star Wolf-Rayet 124 (WR 124) is prominent at the center of the James Webb Space Telescope’s composite image combining near-infrared and mid-infrared wavelengths of light from Webb’s Near-Infrared Camera and Mid-Infrared Instrument https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2023/nasa-s-webb-telescope-captures-rarely-seen-prelude-to-supernova Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 heheh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 39 minutes ago, tater said: heheh Don't. Say. It. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lajoswinkler Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 Just a heads-u, for most of its life under our observation, Uranus did not have visibly distinct features, but recently its pole went brighter. It's not like in images released by Hubble and falsely advertised as normal images made in light, where it's bright white, but subdued, brighter blue than its normal sky blue color. More JWST pictures here. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2023/nasa-s-webb-scores-another-ringed-world-with-new-image-of-uranus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gargamel Posted April 14, 2023 Share Posted April 14, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted April 16, 2023 Share Posted April 16, 2023 This image of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field was taken by the Near-Infrared Camera on NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope. The Webb image observes the field at depths comparable to Hubble – revealing galaxies of similar faintness – in just one-tenth as much observing time. It includes 1.8-micron light shown in blue, 2.1-micron light shown in green, 4.3-micron light shown in yellow, 4.6-micron light shown in orange, and 4.8-micron light shown in red (filters F182M, F210M, F430M, F460M, and F480M). We proposed to image the Ultra Deep Field using some of Webb’s NIRCam’s medium-band image filters, which allowed us to take images of spectral features more accurately than we could with broadband filters because medium-band filters span a shorter wavelength range. This gives us more sensitivity in measuring colors, which helps us understand the history of star formation and ionization properties of galaxies during the first billion years of the universe, like in the Reionization Era. Measuring the energy that galaxies produced in that time will help us understand how galaxies reionized the universe, reverting it from being neutral gas to once again being an ionized plasma like it was after the big bang. James Webb Space Telescope (nasa.gov) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted May 2, 2023 Share Posted May 2, 2023 Totally unknown to me - but apparently stars contain water vapor. If asked I'd have guessed that to be impossible - and been boldly wrong. Webb detects water vapor while staring at a tidally locked super-earth transiting its host Red Dwarf. The question is whether the water vapor signal is evidence of an atmosphere surrounding the tidally locked planet, or a background signal from the star itself https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2023/webb-finds-water-vapor-but-from-a-rocky-planet-or-its-star Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gargamel Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 I’d guess most likely the planet, but an older generation star might have a mix of oxygen and hydrogen in it, and if they hook up, vapor! I’m not sure about higher states of matter for water though, I’d assume if it’s over 100c it’ll be vapor for a very long time? Would the bonds hold up at these temps? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomf Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 A quick search suggests that at the 3000k typical of a red dwarf the reaction to form water from H2 and O2 will be in an equilibrium with roughly equal equal quantities of each gas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piscator Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 They also explicitly mention star spots in the article which would be a fair bit cooler still. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meecrob Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 (edited) On 5/3/2023 at 2:46 AM, tomf said: A quick search suggests that at the 3000k typical of a red dwarf the reaction to form water from H2 and O2 will be in an equilibrium with roughly equal equal quantities of each gas. Its been a while since high school chemistry for me, do you mean an equilibrium reaction, or am I misunderstanding you? Edit: My google-fu isn't as good as yours, I keep getting results for rocky planets with water orbiting a red dwarf. Edited May 7, 2023 by Meecrob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomf Posted May 7, 2023 Share Posted May 7, 2023 5 hours ago, Meecrob said: Its been a while since high school chemistry for me, do you mean an equilibrium reaction, or am I misunderstanding you? It's been a while for me too, but my recollection is that all reactions are equilibrium reactions even if the equilibrium constant is extremely large or small. And that increasing the temperature for an exothermic reaction pushes the reaction to the reverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K^2 Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 Hopefully this is a good topic to stick this into. Just recently there was a bit of a talk about the JWST discovering "problems with physics." There's now convincing research on what's going on, and this is a very good video explaining it in simple terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 11 hours ago, K^2 said: problems with physics At work so I can't watch it. Was the talk about problems with physics or the Crisis in Cosmology (Webb is seeing complex structures at a presumed age where many expected immature systems)? I've seen nothing credible that Webb is challenging physics, but several recent papers claiming our understanding of the early universe needs work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AckSed Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 I use YT transcription services for getting a quick summary of most videos. "Our theories need updating" is about right. If I read the transcript correctly, they haven't learned as much as was hoped about Cold Dark Matter affecting expansion but will have to tweak the software that assumes the initial mass function of the Universe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.