Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mad Rocket Scientist said:

Just define the martian year as 668 martian days, divide into 4 167 sol seasons. The year is closer to 669 sols, but it doesn't divide as nicely, so you just need more frequent leap years. Months are almost entirely unnecessary, and seasons are only needed to make it easy to get an idea of the temperature. All farming is going to be high tech from the start, so the month-based rules of thumb on planting and growing won't be used.

I think you underestimate the desire of people to use customary units for measuring time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Scotius said:

Have you ever ate prawns, crabs or crawfish? They are arthropods. Insects are arthropods too. Therefore you've already technically ate insects. No big deal.

One downside is having to peel insects, this is already an pain with prawns :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, magnemoe said:

One downside is having to peel insects, this is already an pain with prawns :)

 

You can eat deep-fried arthropod shells, no need to peel them. I took deep-fried baby prawns with beer when I was in Greece a month ago. Shells were crunchy and easily edible.

I guess you can also mash them into mincemeat and make insectburgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, magnemoe said:

One downside is having to peel insects, this is already an pain with prawns :)

I eat prawns with shell. (Just not the head)

Lobster and crab? That is a much different story, although i do know people who eat crab shell.

Anyways we are getting off topic. The train is driving in the ocean right now we need to get it back on track.

Edited by NSEP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Xd the great said:

Just wondering: if FH core boosters can be used as falcon 9 boosters, why dont spaceX make just core boosters?

Is it the price?

There are structural enhancements in the FH core, which make it possible to handle the boosters. These are adding weight to the core and if you aren't flying a Falcon Heavy, you would just lose performance, payload mass and therefore money. So indirect yes:wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Scotius said:

Have you ever ate prawns, crabs or crawfish? They are arthropods. Insects are arthropods too. Therefore you've already technically ate insects. No big deal.

People are mammals. Horses are mammals. That does not mean people are horses.

Prawns and crabs are not insects.

3 hours ago, Xd the great said:

Just wondering: if FH core boosters can be used as falcon 9 boosters, why dont spaceX make just core boosters?

Is it the price?

I expect FH core boosters are substantially heavier than falcon 9 boosters, which would eat into the falcon 9 payloads.

Edited by mikegarrison
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mikegarrison said:

People are mammals. Horses are mammals. That does not mean people are horses.

Prawns and crabs are not insects.

That doesn't mean thay can't be eaten. AFAIK eating insects is quite popular in Asia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Precisely. If wiki is to be trusted the aversion to eating insects is an aspect of Western culture. Elsewhere bugs are culinary fair game.

Oh boy what an odd tangent this thread has taken?

Edited by Exploro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Xd the great said:

Will elon allow eating insects on the bfr? Or only frozen meat is allowed.

If a functional set of machines for farming, cooking, etc. is created it could be considered. But that has not been invented yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, cubinator said:

If a functional set of machines for farming, cooking, etc. is created it could be considered. But that has not been invented yet. 

Farming insects on small scale on earth is totally possible. 

Farming crops in space is harder, but it has been done.

Farming both in a bfr on Mars and in space... this will require intensive caring.

starts imagining worms flying aroubd in 0g...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you ignore the mass requirement, then you could use algae to reprocess CO2 (and maybe other wastes), then use the algae as a food source.  (Or use it to feed fish/crustaceans or some other animals).  However that is likely to be fairly heavy.  But might be viable on Mars itself as part of the colonisation efforts.

Edited by AVaughan
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AVaughan said:

If you ignore the mass requirement, then you could use algae to reprocess CO2 (and maybe other wastes), then use the algae as a food source.  (Or use it to feed fish/crustaceans or some other animals).  However that is likely yo be fairly heavy.  But might be viable on Mars itself as part of the colonisation efforts.

Traditonal farming requires soil and water, aka heavy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mad Rocket Scientist said:

Falcon Heavy is surprisingly capable for interplanetary missions.

I watched that last night and until now I had assumed that dV is dV. So I went to my spreadsheet and compiled Falcon 9 payloads vs Atlas V payloads. This probably wasn't the right way of doing it but I assumed that the upper stage expends the same amount of dV to get into a parking orbit dependent on it's booster. i.e. Atlas V LEO max is 18 850 kg so Centaur expends 3032 m/s to get to a parking orbit every time it launches. For Falcon 9, it's 5496 m/s for a 22 800 kg expendable launch. (performance information from wiki) 

Armed with this information and the masses and performance numbers from wiki, I made a table of the total dV for each upper stage and subtracted the circularization dV. As it turns out, Falcon 9 has a dV advantage above around 3t payload. Less than that, Atlas V has more dV

Note: subtracting the circularization dV was to try and account for the different flight profiles of Atlas V and Falcon 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this is mildly interesting (and on topic :o): according to SFN, it seems Telstar 18 has actually been moved up a day, now targeting September 8-9, and...

We have a date for the next Falcon Heavy launch! :D

November 30...  which is one day after CRS-16, and the same month as Demo-1 which will use the same pad, so... I’m betting something’s gonna get delayed somewhere. :(

Also, SAOCOM (first Vandy RTLS) delayed till October 7.:(:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...