Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, sh1pman said:

Any official word on the central booster situation?

Well, it WOULD explain the strange barge behavior that we saw earlier, possibly including the "destination: CLASSIFIED" thing.

 

UPDATE:

OFFICIAL CONFIRMATION in this Verge article: https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/15/18311945/spacex-falcon-heavy-center-core-drone-ship-rough-ocean

Edited by ThatGuyWithALongUsername
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Delay said:

Well, they lost it due to the inevitabilites of nature, not due to technical failure. Still a 100% success in my opinion.

Well it is a failure for their reusability goals. I think this was the furthest downrange recovery they have attempted, which means more travel time on the open seas, which are not known to be forgiving to the ambitions of humans. 

Another reason for a system that always does RTLS in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Nightside said:

Another reason for a system that always does RTLS in my opinion.

Wouldn't that turn FH completely redundant? The only reason they are using their ASDS in the first place is because they want to use their first stage to the full potential, which means that returning the center core to Cape is - as mentioned in the webcasts - no longer an option.

Sure, Super Heavy will do it, but that'll still take a few years.

Edited by Delay
Super Heavy is designed to always perform RTLS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Delay said:

Wouldn't that turn FH completely redundant? The only reason they are using their ASDS in the first place is because they want to use their first stage to the full potential, which means that returning the center core to Cape is - as mentioned in the webcasts - no longer an option.

Sure, Super Heavy could probably do it, but that'll still take a few years.

You kinda answered your own question... Super Heavy could do it, AND will make FH completely redundant.

In fact, they probably WILL do that with SH- but if their P2P plans are still around, the launch site won't always be on land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember the sea looked pretty rough after the landing. Not surprised nobody could board to make safe if octagrabber wasn't compatible. 

Still sad though. This the first loss of a block 5?

Edited by RCgothic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...