Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Delay said:

You can't operate space stations with 90s tech forever.

Fingers crossed man ! Soyuz controls of the current MS era looks pretty good as well. Capacitive sensors - the technology behind touchscreens - are actually pretty resilient; screens could be cracked but the risks can be evaluated well.

23 minutes ago, Delay said:

And there's the answer to my question from yesterday: Dragon is a very smooth vehicle during liftoff!

They say it's more "alive" - probably from the two peak-g.

Edited by YNM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, YNM said:

They says it's more "alive"

Not surprising, it's a Dragon after all.

The lack of SRBs does make for a smoother ride, however. Of course you have two bumps - MECO and S2 ignition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Shuttle was quite shaky in early stages, but once the SRBs burn out, it's fairly smooth, compared to F9 which is not quite as shaky, but shaky all the way?

Could it be down to pure mass; higher mass of Shuttle dampening vibrations?

1 hour ago, Nothalogh said:

Does anybody know what pants the DM2 crew are wearing when not in their suits?

Here's the answer from an ISS astronaut:

https://www.quora.com/Where-can-I-buy-clothes-like-the-ISS-astronauts-wear

NASA attached the velcros, but it's basically this:

https://www.cabelas.com/product/Clothing/Mens-Casual-Clothing/Mens-Casual-Pants/Mens-Cargo-Pants|/pc/104797080/c/104746680/sc/104262480/i/104076180/Cabelas-Legendary-7-Pocket- Hiker-Pants/1323177.uts?destination=/category/Mens-Cargo-Pants/104076180.uts

Sold out, of course.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Delay said:

Not surprising, it's a Dragon after all.

The lack of SRBs does make for a smoother ride, however. Of course you have two bumps - MECO and S2 ignition.

Yes also the shuttle has weird aerodynamic during launch. Basically all the not to do stuff for an KSP rocket :)
Don't know about Soyuz but its an old design pretty sure falcon 9 has better engine control. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nothalogh said:

Higher upper stage TWR than Shuttle, this is probably more comparable to Gemini on a Titan

I was actually wondering about that short >4g moments, but I guess it's fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, sh1pman said:

If only you guys could see the crazy ****storm happening right now in Russian social media after this launch and Elon’s comment about trampoline. People from all political sides bashing Rogozin and Roscosmos for incompetence. My entire feed turned into space experts’ battleground. Looks like Elon has much more support here than I thought.

What's this about "trampoline" ?  I'm assuming it's not this.  I'm no great fan of Elon and he has said some very stupid things in the past.  He has gotten better at not screwing up, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt until I hear otherwise.

 

6 hours ago, Delay said:

We all missed this, didn't we?

I definitely want to see that suit!

Sigh, always "The Fruit of the Month".   Did you ever stop to think that big Kerbal helmet might be functional?  How do you think they fix things in space and usually so quickly?  They beat their heads on it.  Huge helmet => frustrating part => problem solved! :)

Edited by Jacke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jacke said:

What's this about "trampoline" ?  I'm assuming it's not this.  I'm no great fan of Elon and he has said some very stupid things in the past.  He has gotten better at not screwing up, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt until I hear otherwise.

It was a reference to this

From 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Nothalogh said:

Why, and for what purpose?

Rogozin sometimes talks too much. That, and the general lack of innovation in Russian space industry for the past 30 years. Crew Dragon launch further illustrated this growing lag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, YNM said:

Pretty sure they do on the ISS as well ! As long as you can generate enough suction, you can still drink well from an enclosed bottle.

Or you can just squeeze it.

Only thing easier to drink from would be a flattenable pouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sevenperforce said:

Or you can just squeeze it.

Only thing easier to drink from would be a flattenable pouch.

I think they normally use pouches for drinks on ISS for that reason. It's the easiest thing to drink from in microgravity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Nothalogh said:

Higher upper stage TWR than Shuttle, this is probably more comparable to Gemini on a Titan

Minimum throttle on the Soyuz-FG's RD-0110 upper stage engine is 90.5% of its 298 kN, or 269.69 kN, which is a burnout acceleration of 2.89 gees (7.1 tonne payload, 2.4 tonne upper stage).

Merlin 1D Vac can throttle down to about 2.45 gees at burnout with the higher mass of Dragon. I did a frame-by-frame count of velocity just before first-stage burnout, around T+02:26, and got 23.9 m/s2 or 2.44 gees.

The Shuttle limited its burnout thrust to 3 gees. 

EDIT: See below; S2 burnout was nearly 4 gees.

Edited by sevenperforce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just did a frame-by-frame count of the end of the second-stage burn, from T+08:49 to T+08:50, and got a whopping 39.2 m/s2 just before SECO. That's almost four gees. So evidently they did not downthrottle very far...especially given that we know they had ample residuals.

If we assume an 18-tonne burnout mass (12 tonnes of capsule, 4 tonnes of dry mass, 2 tonnes of props) then that is 705.6 kN, which is about 75.5% full thrust.

Edited by sevenperforce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sevenperforce said:

I just did a frame-by-frame count of the end of the second-stage burn, from T+08:49 to T+08:50, and got a whopping 39.2 m/s2 just before SECO. That's almost four gees. So evidently they did not downthrottle very far...especially given that we know they had ample residuals.

If we assume an 18-tonne burnout mass (12 tonnes of capsule, 4 tonnes of dry mass, 2 tonnes of props) then that is 705.6 kN, which is about 75.5% full thrust.

I recall the astronauts themselves saying they got about 4.8 gees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...