Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, AVaughan said:

I would expect that the thrust puck (and the thrust simulator during tank tests) will need to be significantly heavier to handle the loads for a superheavy with 30+ sea level raptors.  Of course they could build a test superheavy with a starship thrust puck for a quick test hop, but I don't really see the point, (unless they are in a rush to build a super heavy for publicity reasons).  

(Also if super heavy still has 7 gimballed engines in the center, then I would expect that to be a central engine, plus 6 surrounding engines.  Shouldn't that arrangement result in a visibly different thrust puck from starship?)

You might be right. I was thinking that they (people taking pics) might not notice thickness changes in stock just from seeing it. Forgot about the different arrangement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dogleg on the return may be easier than you would think with all the aerodynamic control it has, just crank it over after the entry burn. Falcon 9 glides pretty well for a rocket, and they already do somewhat of a dogleg anyway for their normal landings, just more vertical than horizontal. Besides, a bit of extra lateral G loading won't hurt, not after seeing what CRS-17 made it through without breaking up. Makes you wonder if that mission gave them the confidence to try a launch like this?

Edited by .50calBMG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...