Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Flying dutchman said:

What Will super heavy have to to different?

Testing, for one thing. IIRC, most of N1’s problems were solvable, but it never saw any stand testing, only test flights... which are, er, considerably harder to recover articles from if something goes wrong. Now, Superheavy, it looks like, won’t be seeing any full-duration static fires either, but it has the advantage of several more decades of engineering experience to borrow from, massive improvements in computing power to better model engine dynamics in ways the soviets couldn’t even dream of, and it’s gonna be really, really cheap and fast to replace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

What Will super heavy have to to different?

Vastly superior everything, particularly computers.

The computers are not just to control the engines—though that helps rather a lot—but also to model everything beforehand in a way that a room full of guys with slide rules just couldn't do.

Edited by tater
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Flying dutchman said:

Genuine question: Why couldn't n1 handle alle those engines close together, what where the failure points?

Many of the N1 failures were actually unrelated to the use itself of so many engines, and more about the lack of proper testing and badly programmed avionics, with on the top of that the fact that the engine wasn't much reliable. For example, a failure (I think the one with the biggest boom) was because when an engine in the first stage had problems its computer was programmed so that the solution was to *shut down every engine*. Obviously, after that the N1 crashed and made a big explosion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They also couldn't test fire any of the actual engine flight articles for N1. They were one-use items. Individual engines were tested, but not any that would fly, and not any together.

Raptor gets extensively prefired at McGregor before it ever gets near Starship/Superheavy. And whilst Superheavy won't have any *full duration* static fires before flight, we do still expect to see static fires.

Plus modern computational fluid dynamics is *way* better than what they had in the 60s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, magnemoe said:

And all KSP players know the issues with this plan , they was ballistic missiles with an limited range of less than half the diameter of earth, they could not reach orbit and hitting the sun is hard, moon is much easier but also harder than orbit. Yes ICBM has been used for orbital missions but with smaller payloads. 

The alt-text of the original comic explains that the missiles were helped out of Earth's gravity well by strapping on extra boosters, developed for Amazon's same-day-delivery option for the Lunar colony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tater said:

 

Is that a connector for canadarm in there?

I figure it’s to take the pallet out of the trunk. 

Just now, SpaceFace545 said:

Thats really cool, I haven't seen much of the trunk being used yet. I assume the new iROSA panels are to supplement the aging current panels?

Yes. 
 

Spoiler

Good info in here. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, SpaceFace545 said:

and probably to do most of legwork to get the panels in the rough location

All the trunk caroges need to be grappled, then the arm can move them pretty much where they need to go. The arm system is pretty cool, albeit very, very expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JoeSchmuckatelli said:

Could SN 15's final flight be part of of the suborbital SH test?  'landing in the Pacific somewhere near Hawaii'? 

Or are they more likely to use one of the more recent SNs? 

The test is orbital, just because it won't go all the way around the Earth doesn't mean it's suborbital. Starship will achieve orbital velocity.

And SN15 doesn't have mounts for vacuum-optimised Raptors, a stage separation system, or a full heatshield. It's incapable of participating in the orbital test flight. The current plan is to use SN20, which will have the aforementioned features.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh wow 16 is already done?

Also I wonder is they've been flying Raptors at 330 bar. We know it's been possible for a while, because  SN39 (?) did it back in August.

Was that just a one-time thing to get the world record or have they been taking advantage of the high performance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Spaceman.Spiff said:

Oh wow 16 is already done?

It's been basically like that since before SN15 flew, but atm it's kind of on hold since they haven't mounted the covers on the flaps after more than two weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...