Jump to content

KSP Interstellar Extended Continued Development Thread


FreeThinker
 Share

Recommended Posts

rZ9phGN.jpg

I'll add some greeebles on the top and bottom, (probably the little cylinder bulges to look consistent) and the texture on the MHD is really temporary. This texture didn't work as well on the MHD as i thought it would have.
Doubt I'll have much use for this outside of KSPI so comments? suggestions? @FreeThinker?

Edited by SpaceMouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SpaceMouse said:

rZ9phGN.jpg

I'll add some greeebles on the top and bottom, (probably the little cylinder bulges to look consistent) and the texture on the MHD is really temporary. This texture didn't work as well on the MHD as i thought it would have.
Doubt I'll have much use for this outside of KSPI so comments? suggestions? @FreeThinker?

I prefer a more inside out look, like you did with your reactor, showing some intresting technical details that teaches player a story. It should say, I'm a Magnetohydrodynamic generator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FreeThinker said:

I prefer a more inside out look, like you did with your reactor, showing some intresting technical details that teaches player a story. It should say, I'm a Magnetohydrodynamic generator

Hmmm.  I was actually gonna try to get away from that because it was inconsistent with all the other kspi parts. Wanted to reuse the texture for lower ram use as well but, i can certainly do the structural thing and recycle parts I've made. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I old like to help out with this mod, so I'm working on a part for you! It's my own little idea, which I call a dual-step RTG. Basically, water pipes coil around an RTG. Any heat that escapes the RTG's heat-to-electricity conversion boils the water into steam, which drives a turbine, which drives a generator. The steam goes into a tank where it condenses back into water, and the cycle repeats. So, you can get rid of any waste heat that an RTG produces and get more power out of it. So I guess it's a tiny nuclear power plant, but the reactor part is replaced by an RTG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Refax said:

do i have to take EM Drive to the Space first? and which reactor and generator is the best for this engine?

Yes. EM Drive doesn't have the power to weight to take off from planets. You'll need to send it to space with a normal rocket and while you can power it with anything, a large reactor and large radiators are very helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SpaceMouse said:

Yes. EM Drive doesn't have the power to weight to take off from planets. You'll need to send it to space with a normal rocket and while you can power it with anything, a large reactor and large radiators are very helpful.

aight, thanks ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might I recommend adding a series of laser-based communication devices that would provide more range and higher science transfer rates than antennae, but use much, much more power? I think that these would be extremely useful for long distance communications, e.g. with OPM. Also, maybe a quantum-entangled particle communications utility, have 2 identical parts tuned to each other, have one of them on one ship, and one on another, and they can communicate back and forth. This would be useful for interstellar communications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KSPNerd said:

Might I recommend adding a series of laser-based communication devices that would provide more range and higher science transfer rates than antennae, but use much, much more power? I think that these would be extremely useful for long distance communications, e.g. with OPM. Also, maybe a quantum-entangled particle communications utility, have 2 identical parts tuned to each other, have one of them on one ship, and one on another, and they can communicate back and forth. This would be useful for interstellar communications.

You can use radialy mounted comms on your docked rockets to the ship which you control as main, it should improve your signal and transfer rates as well at any distance, but remember to mount more energy suppliers :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LJo6QN1.jpg

Did more fiddling. I'd like to keep this one consistent with the other generators, Has generators and turbines now Reactor return tubes. I might add some wires and, I'd like to do something with the extrusions on the sides Scaling fiddling has made them not quite fit right. I blocked out the bottom intake corners, i can rotate the magnetothingys, but it looks like it would be easier to deal with huge exaust flow this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, KSPNerd said:

Might I recommend adding a series of laser-based communication devices that would provide more range and higher science transfer rates than antennae, but use much, much more power? I think that these would be extremely useful for long distance communications, e.g. with OPM. Also, maybe a quantum-entangled particle communications utility, have 2 identical parts tuned to each other, have one of them on one ship, and one on another, and they can communicate back and forth. This would be useful for interstellar communications.

I intend to make all suitable dishes capable of long range communications, some will even be able to do it from extra solar systems

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, KAL 9000 said:

I old like to help out with this mod, so I'm working on a part for you! It's my own little idea, which I call a dual-step RTG. Basically, water pipes coil around an RTG. Any heat that escapes the RTG's heat-to-electricity conversion boils the water into steam, which drives a turbine, which drives a generator. The steam goes into a tank where it condenses back into water, and the cycle repeats. So, you can get rid of any waste heat that an RTG produces and get more power out of it. So I guess it's a tiny nuclear power plant, but the reactor part is replaced by an RTG.

How much Megajoule is such "RTG reactor" supposed to produce? :D

 

 

 

10 hours ago, SpaceMouse said:

LJo6QN1.jpg

Did more fiddling. I'd like to keep this one consistent with the other generators, Has generators and turbines now Reactor return tubes. I might add some wires and, I'd like to do something with the extrusions on the sides Scaling fiddling has made them not quite fit right. I blocked out the bottom intake corners, i can rotate the magnetothingys, but it looks like it would be easier to deal with huge exaust flow this way.

Yes, this looks much better! I love the external details they give it real character, and give it a more realsitic look Is it symetric?

Edited by FreeThinker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, FreeThinker said:

How much Megajoule is such "RTG reactor" supposed to produce? :D

 

 

 

Yes, this looks much better! I love the external details they give it real character, and give it a more realsitic look Is it symetric?

Thanks! It's definitely symmetric, i only usually model 1/4, mirror modifier is my friend. :D

I'm probably going to scale down the MHD's again, i can't imagine any reactors would have reactor outputs this big, and then super- high velocity exaust doesn't need to make a right- angle turn at the top. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KAL 9000 said:

17.532 MJ/hour 

I'm terrible at modeling and texturing, could someone make a model/texture for this?

You could switch it to ElectricCharge generation, it would make 4.5 ElectricCharge per second.

Are you sure that the heat of a RTG can make a turbine work and produce all this energy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Nansuchao said:

Are you sure that the heat of a RTG can make a turbine work and produce all this energy?

Well it depends if 4.87 KJ/second is enough ...  seems a little on the low side. ...

It think the best you can hope for is to use thermal electric converter, which is at best 10% efficient.. meaning it can generate a whooping 0.87 kW = 0.87 Electric Charge, which perhaps is just enough to keep the small life support of a 3 man can active on Mars ..

Edited by FreeThinker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FreeThinker said:

Well it depends if 4.87 KJ/second is enough ...  seems a little on the low side. ...

It think the best you can hope for is to use thermal electric converter, which is at best 10%.. meaning it can generate a whooping 0.87 kW = 0.87 Electric Change, which perhaps is just enough to keep the small life support of a 3 man can active ..

0.87 EC*S? In this case, the stock one is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FreeThinker said:

Well it depends if 4.87 KJ/second is enough ...  seems a little on the low side. ...

It think the best you can hope for is to use thermal electric converter, which is at best 10%.. meaning it can generate a whooping 0.87 kW = 0.87 Electric Change, which perhaps is just enough to keep the small life support of a 3 man can active ..

Well, the turbines and stuff are all miniaturized, and the heat energy of the RTG can boil all water in the small tank in ~46 seconds. That could drive a very small turbine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, FreeThinker said:

I don't think most players grasp how powerful they are, they even work forever!

You're right, the issue in KSP is the low EC capacity per part. If you try to make a replica of any real probe, you'll find yourself unable to transmit back to the KSC any experiment except the most basic ( thermometer, barometer)ones, unless you add a tremendous amount of batteries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...