Jump to content

KSP Weekly: A Voyage in a Lifetime

SQUAD

By SQUAD
in KSP1 The Daily Kerbal

 Share

Recommended Posts

SQUAD

SQUAD

Posted
Posted
tumblr_inline_ouj5qouTWs1rr2wit_540.png

Welcome to KSP Weekly everyone. On August 10, 1989, the Voyager 2 spacecraft detected two partial rings of debris around Neptune, providing the first direct evidence that Neptune has rings. Neptune’s flyby was the last planetary visit by the probe and to this day it has been the only spacecraft to ever visit the ice giant. The Voyager 2 space probe was launched by NASA on August 20, 1977, to study the outer planets. Part of the Voyager program, it was launched 16 days before its twin, Voyager 1, on a trajectory that took longer to reach the Jovian (1979) and Saturnian systems (1981) but enabled further encounters with Uranus and Neptune, the former having also only been visited by it in 1986. Although its primary mission ended with the exploration of the Neptunian system on October 2, 1989, Voyager 2 is now in its extended mission to study the outer reaches of the Solar System and has been operating for 39 years, 11 months and 22 days as of today. It remains in contact through the Deep Space Network and at a distance of 115 AU (1.72×1010 km) from the Sun, Voyager 2 is one of the most distant human-made objects, along with Voyager 1, New Horizons, Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11. The probe is moving at a velocity of 34,390.98 mph (55,346.92 km/h) relative to the Sun and is traveling through the heliosheath. Upon reaching interstellar space, Voyager 2 is expected to provide the first direct measurements of the density and temperature of the interstellar plasma. If you want learn more about the mission, its status and see the wonderful gallery of images taken by the probe, click here. Have you ever tried to visit as many planets as Voyager 2 on a single trajectory in KSP? Kinda difficult, right? But let’s move on and talk about KSP development.

This week the development team was busy completing the preparations for the upcoming 1.3.1 pre-release. Soon we’ll announce its release details, so stay tuned for that.

In other news, the upgraded version of KSP for consoles continues. This week specifically, the QA team worked their way through a growing list of Ready-To-Test fixes from Blitworks on the bugtracker, and discussing with design on how best to refine the various KSP controls and control modes for the console platforms. As you can imagine, the QA team provides the devs with very valuable input on this regard, since they spend a huge amount of hours playing these builds and all of them are already very experienced KSP players.

As usual, work on the Making History Expansion was also part of this week’s tasks at hand and things are going very well and progressing nicely! For starters, its design work continued, each week details here and there are tweaked so that the pathway that devs follow remains clear and makes sense as a whole. At the end of the day, every project needs to follow some sort of blueprints to be successful and these guidelines need to also have the flexibility to adapt to the given circumstances and needs that unfold as the team moves forward. Coupled with the design, there are the task that involve distribution of assignments, which involve among other things the rounding out of the backlog stories and work lists for the expansion so devs can plan out the work and sprints, as well as reviewing each other’s work through our internal review processes before a story is completed. 

Devs have also been working on a system for displaying mission objectives in a way that makes sense. Objectives form the basis of what the player sees on the Mission  Summary Screen, giving the player an idea of what that mission entails. They have also been working on getting crew assignment working nicely in the Mission Builder.

Besides the work mentioned above, the devs also dealt with the merging of the vessel placement code with the overall Vessel Management elements in the Mission Builder. The team has also been working on a new tool for celestial bodies to specify target areas on their surface. This tool will be pretty useful to mark objectives, or perhaps hazard zones. Similarly the orbit editor, which we mentioned last week, is still being worked on and, as with anything that has to do with orbits, there’s a whole lot of math going on there to keep our devs entertained for a while! And to wrap up the Making History Expansion’s development update, the new Service Module’s code is still being written into the game.

On the artistic side of development, while also work on the next American-inspired engine and on the Voskhod 2-inspired IVA continues. There has been some modeling in the agenda, too, specifically on the Mk 1-3 IVA.

Finally, we encourage you to participate in our latest KSP Challenge - The Atari Challenge. This time around, the challenge consists of capturing 2 asteroids with a single vessel and a single launch from Kerbin. There’s a scoring system to determine who the most adept asteroid hunters are. Are you up to the challenge? Check it out and share your creations!

That’s it for this week. Be sure to join us on our official forums, and don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and Facebook. Stay tuned for more exciting and upcoming news and development updates!

Happy launchings!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dundral mk2

Dundral mk2

Posted
Posted (edited)

With each update im starting to wonder how much modders could do with the ability to add object and or resources and perhaps kerbals to the surfaces of celestial bodies. Perhapse it could enable a mini campaign of sorts.

For example: Gather discover enough of X objects found to be fuel sources on celestial bodies to allow kerbals the power to return to their true homeworld, and escape from the terraformed colony world of Kerbin... maybe even get rewarded with a new star system to explore? if you could only procedurally generate star systems with these objects on them, you could explore endlessly... and I do mean explore endlessly. (anyone been to system seeded 3a423666d62bee6f6891 yet?) That IMO would be my biggest dream for a KSP endgame.

Can missions be linked together like this or is it limited to a singe instance launch and go for the win?

Edited by Dundral mk2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
StupidAndy

StupidAndy

Posted
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Spaceman17 said:

mk-1 = mercury

mk-1.5 = gemini

mk-1-2 = apollo

mk-1-3 = orion

mk-1-3.5 = cst-100

mk-1.5-2 = soyuz

mk-1,5-3 = shenzhou

where's dragon?

Edited by StupidAndy
you want to know what i hate? when you quote something and it has a quote without words in it
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Enorats

Enorats

Posted
Posted

If I'm not mistaken, the Orion heat shield was changed following the initial test because they were worried it wouldn't stand up to interplanetary reentry. It's made of a different material entirely now.

Don't quote me on that, but I seem to remember reading that somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raptor9

Raptor9

Posted
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Enorats said:

If I'm not mistaken, the Orion heat shield was changed following the initial test because they were worried it wouldn't stand up to interplanetary reentry. It's made of a different material entirely now.

Don't quote me on that

I hereby document you as Quoted.  May the odds be ever in your favor. :sticktongue:

Edited by Raptor9
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HafCoJoe

HafCoJoe

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Caelib said:

I wouldn't expect to see this expansion before Summer 2018, based on the progress of things since the mass exodus.

Do you remember how long the wait was for Career mode? This is an equally (if not more) complex update so I would expect for it to take that much time if not more. I don't think they are understaffed at all, just extra busy. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tater

tater

Posted
Posted

There are no KSP images this week, but a simple question:

When you do post a KSP Weekly, why not simply embed the images instead of links? Aside from being unambiguously "better," as a reading experience, it avoids the truly awful requirement for "Click Here" links, which is just bad design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
klgraham1013

klgraham1013

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, tater said:

There are no KSP images this week, but a simple question:

When you do post a KSP Weekly, why not simply embed the images instead of links? Aside from being unambiguously "better," as a reading experience, it avoids the truly awful requirement for "Click Here" links, which is just bad design.

A marketing person probably said having to click a link builds anticipation for the image behind said link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...