Jump to content

Russian Launch and Mission Thread


tater

Recommended Posts

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=ru&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rbc.ru%2Ftechnology_and_media%2F26%2F07%2F2021%2F60fed30f9a794750d8812f2e&sandbox=1

Pirs has successfully reached the underwater stationary orbit near Wellington, joining the Pacific satellite constellation.

 

Edited by kerbiloid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kerbiloid said:

No, the grapple fixture is there :) this specific airlock module is currently attached on the side of rassvet  :) (Which was launched by space shuttle)

this poor thing waited Nauka for nearly 11 years ! 

once the european arm (launched with nauka) is operationnal, one of the operations will be to move it from rassvet to nauka :)

you can see it on rassvet pictures ;)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rassvet_(ISS_module)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be the cynical part of my brain talking, but I can't help but wonder: if something as basic, yet critical, as a main engine failure passed unseen by QC, is it really wise to hook this thing up to the ISS? What else can be deadly wrong with it that the quality control didn't catch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Codraroll said:

It might be the cynical part of my brain talking, but I can't help but wonder: if something as basic, yet critical, as a main engine failure passed unseen by QC, is it really wise to hook this thing up to the ISS? What else can be deadly wrong with it that the quality control didn't catch?

I doubt that really came from your cynical half, That's a concern I've been having.

Nauka was fun to laugh at but now that we've sacrificed a module for this thing it's becoming serious.

I hope the docking and subsequent events are uneventful, anyhow Il be on vacation when all the Boeing/Nauka stuff goes down so I hope I don't return to a disaster:/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, Codraroll said:

It might be the cynical part of my brain talking, but I can't help but wonder: if something as basic, yet critical, as a main engine failure passed unseen by QC, is it really wise to hook this thing up to the ISS? What else can be deadly wrong with it that the quality control didn't catch?

Seems to be working now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Codraroll said:

It might be the cynical part of my brain talking, but I can't help but wonder: if something as basic, yet critical, as a main engine failure passed unseen by QC, is it really wise to hook this thing up to the ISS? What else can be deadly wrong with it that the quality control didn't catch?

As far as we know, currently just the cruise propulsion and the docking systems had any malfunction.

Both will be of no use after docking.

Also we can remember Salyut-7 (uncharged, then restored), Priroda (had a power system malfuction before docking), Spektr (rammed and was leaking), Kvant (Igla docking system malfunction, missed 10 m from the station on the first attempt).

So, it's okay.

***

Still it's strange that the maneuvering takes so many ignitions, while similar Mir modules needed just 3 days.

Looks like actually they run on DPS.

5 hours ago, Minmus Taster said:

Nauka was fun to laugh at but now that we've sacrificed a module for this thing it's becoming serious.

Now it will be her turn to laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From RT:

Quote

…the Russian Defense Ministry released a series of statements that made for an interesting backdrop for MAKS. The first featured a video of a successful test launch of a Zircon anti-ship hypersonic cruise missile.

Talk at the show suggested there would be another launch in the near future – this time, at the maximum range (1000+ km), and the target would be an aircraft carrier.

Given that “Admiral Kuznetsov” is currently in repairs until 2022, what (and which country’s) aircraft carrier are they going to use as a practice target? Will the carrier crew be notified in advance, or will there be a surprise test?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sh1pman said:

From RT:

Given that “Admiral Kuznetsov” is currently in repairs until 2022, what (and which country’s) aircraft carrier are they going to use as a practice target? Will the carrier crew be notified in advance, or will there be a surprise test?

It will be outside of 

13 minutes ago, sh1pman said:

maximum range (1000+ km)

for safety reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.interfax.ru/russia/781308

Nauka has performed the last orbit correction on its way to new home.

Also, EVA will not required. So, the extinguishers stay where they are.

8 minutes ago, DDE said:

The movie of my schoolhood.

Spoiler

4ee5eb80-dc65-401e-9e2d-cf39e84a46d6.jpg

(The episodes with the yacht and with the nuke warhead reloading. Watched the movie about 8 times for them. Happily, now I have KSP.)

Edited by kerbiloid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...