damonvv

[1.10.x] Tundra Exploration - v2.0 (July 4th) - (Re)Stockalike SpaceX Falcon 9, Dragon V2 and Starship!

Recommended Posts

Any release date in mind? I'm super excited for that Crew Dragon update.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, alberro+ said:

Any release date in mind? I'm super excited for that Crew Dragon update.

on the github rn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Natokerbal said:

on the github rn

Wait what the heck I didn’t get thisss

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/4/2020 at 7:53 PM, Natokerbal said:

on the github rn

Also, is it gonna break my stuff? I don’t usually get the beta versions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alberro+ said:

Also, is it gonna break my stuff? I don’t usually get the beta versions.

it shouldn't @damonvv is good about releasing stable things on the github

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/5/2020 at 10:49 PM, Natokerbal said:

it shouldn't @damonvv is good about releasing stable things on the github

Just got the update on github, and it works perfectly. I had to replace the RO textures but that that it really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm playing in 1.7.3 with the Realism Overhaul pack installed and the Super Heavy Booster is not compatible with Real Fuels. The Engine won't ignite even with a normal tank with the right fuel and the super heavy tank can't hold fuel. Is there something I can do to fix that? And will zhis mod compatible with RO in the future?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, masterchief_draws said:

I'm playing in 1.7.3 with the Realism Overhaul pack installed and the Super Heavy Booster is not compatible with Real Fuels. The Engine won't ignite even with a normal tank with the right fuel and the super heavy tank can't hold fuel. Is there something I can do to fix that? And will zhis mod compatible with RO in the future?

When RO switches to 1.8.1 it will be supported. For the fuel issue I have no idea. I bet @JadeOfMaar or @Nessus_ Knows more about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi, does the RO patch also allow this mod to work with RSS on KSP 1.7.3? 

 

EDIT: I tried it out real quick. It seems to work fine but I'm not sure if the values are proper for RSS. Would still like to know if the RO patch is compatible with it.

However the craft files are completely messed up, and some attachment nodes are out of place. I have to manually rebuild the rocket and move parts that are attached incorrectly. 

Edited by Miza

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no RO patch for Tundra. It's better you learn to make them because other RO users have asked...and those configs.....still don't exist.

22 hours ago, masterchief_draws said:

I'm playing in 1.7.3 with the Realism Overhaul pack installed and the Super Heavy Booster is not compatible with Real Fuels. The Engine won't ignite even with a normal tank with the right fuel and the super heavy tank can't hold fuel. Is there something I can do to fix that? And will zhis mod compatible with RO in the future?

Thanks for spotting. The Super Heavy tank was missing its RF entries-- fixed now on GitHub.

MM patching is arguably the easiest form of KSP modding and many mod makers start out this way. So I'd recommend you learn to write MM patches, and eventually, write RO patches yourself. Truthfully speaking, I have the impression that nobody who plays RO can write for it.

2 hours ago, Miza said:

Hi, does the RO patch also allow this mod to work with RSS on KSP 1.7.3? 

Hi there. There is no RO patch for Tundra. I could write them...but RO is far out of my scope as a player. So, as I'll tell anyone who asks, it's better you learn to create these configs because months have passed, and months will pass, and others come asking for them, and nobody has come saying "Hey. I made RO configs for this. Try'em out."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JadeOfMaar said:

Hi there. There is no RO patch for Tundra. I could write them...but RO is far out of my scope as a player. So, as I'll tell anyone who asks, it's better you learn to create these configs because months have passed, and months will pass, and others come asking for them, and nobody has come saying "Hey. I made RO configs for this. Try'em out."

Literally the third post on this topic has RO configs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohhhhhh. That's embarrassing. :D I literally don't scroll past the OP post when on the front page. I'd never notice. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this mod is supposed to be (re)stockalike, but how come the solar panel on the Dragon V2 trunk is blue and not black? I think it’d look a lot cooler with a black curved panel.

Edit: I just noticed that the trunk doesn’t decouple on stage.

Edited by alberro+

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, alberro+ said:

but how come the solar panel on the Dragon V2 trunk is blue and not black?

In my reasoning, its form is very unique (curved, built into the hull, not blue) so it could be hard for players who are not close followers of SpaceX to notice, and they may add solar panels over it, possibly blocking it. It's blue in order to make itself obvious, as nearly all solar panels in KSP are blue. It's a major design convention.

Edited by JadeOfMaar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, JadeOfMaar said:

and they may add solar panels over it

I use the panels to block the panels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, JadeOfMaar said:

In my reasoning, its form is very unique (curved, built into the hull, not blue) so it could be hard for players who are not close followers of SpaceX to notice, and they may add solar panels over it, possibly blocking it. It's blue in order to make itself obvious, as nearly all solar panels in KSP are blue. It's a major design convention.

That sounds reasonable, but why not just put a switchable function in the trunk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, alberro+ said:

That sounds reasonable, but why not just put a switchable function in the trunk?

Not sure. Maybe @Starwaster could help with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, damonvv said:

Not sure. Maybe @Starwaster could help with that.

To Switch between blue and black panels? Definitely doable with stock modules 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Starwaster said:

To Switch between blue and black panels? Definitely doable with stock modules 

I meant that your module for the animated decoupler doesn't have a build in decouple stage icon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, damonvv said:

I meant that your module for the animated decoupler doesn't have a build in decouple stage icon.

That’s a function of the part config. 
 

add 

stagingIcon = DECOUPLER_VERT

to the config for the part (not in the module itself, just the PART node

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Starwaster said:

That’s a function of the part config. 
 

add 

stagingIcon = DECOUPLER_VERT

to the config for the part (not in the module itself, just the PART node

Oh!! Perfect!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Starwaster said:

That’s a function of the part config. 
 

add 

stagingIcon = DECOUPLER_VERT

to the config for the part (not in the module itself, just the PART node

Wait wait, where am I supposed to go? I’ve never edited parts so I really have no clue what I’m looking for.

 

Edit:So I add stagingIcon = DECOUPLER_VERT to what file? Is it TE_18_DRAGONV2_TRUNK? And where ando I put it?

Edited by alberro+

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, alberro+ said:

Wait wait, where am I supposed to go? I’ve never edited parts so I really have no clue what I’m looking for.

 

Edit:So I add stagingIcon = DECOUPLER_VERT to what file? Is it TE_18_DRAGONV2_TRUNK? And where ando I put it?

Relax, fix is coming to github right now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, damonvv said:

Relax, fix is coming to github right now!

Oh thank you. I once tried to fix something myself and ended up ruining my ksp install. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

deleted

Edited by alberro+

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.