maja

[KSP 1.8.1] Bon Voyage (1.0.1) - 2019-11-04

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, aluc24 said:

Sorry, I forgot to mention I am running KSP 1.7.3. Was the support for NF Electrical added only for KSP 1.8.1 version of BV?

The same. KSP 1.7.3, BV 0.5.3, NF Electrical 1.0.3. The support for NF is there a long time.

But I see, that you have differnt PAW on the reactor than I (see bellow). Don't you have other mod, which can change the reactor's behavior?

7eZRR8Fh.png

Edited by maja

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, maja said:

The same. KSP 1.7.3, BV 0.5.3, NF Electrical 1.0.3. The support for NF is there a long time.

But I see, that you have differnt PAW on the reactor than I (see bellow). Don't you have other mod, which can change the reactor's behavior?

 

I have Kerbalism, which comes with DynamicBatteryStorage. Perhaps that mod could be related? Otherwise, this is my mod list:

rr1yc7o.png

 

Do you see anything that could be causing a conflict? If so, I can try removing it to narrow down the problem.

Edited by aluc24

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@aluc24 Kerbalism will be the culprit. It removes modules of mods and use it's own in a lot of cases. I had issues with it before KSP 1.5, so I ended with accepting zero power of a rover when Kerbalism was present, but I withdrawed this "support" when I did overhaul of BV for KSP 1.5.1. I don't know, if I want to try it again and start fully supporting Kerbalism. How many of you, Kerbalism users who are using BV, are here anyway?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, maja said:

@aluc24 Kerbalism will be the culprit. It removes modules of mods and use it's own in a lot of cases. I had issues with it before KSP 1.5, so I ended with accepting zero power of a rover when Kerbalism was present, but I withdrawed this "support" when I did overhaul of BV for KSP 1.5.1. I don't know, if I want to try it again and start fully supporting Kerbalism. How many of you, Kerbalism users who are using BV, are here anyway?

Well, I'm one... But I guess I will be dropping Kerbalism. As awesome as it is, it has tons of bugs, and it's incompatibility with so many mods makes it not really worth it in the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, aluc24 said:

I have Kerbalism, which comes with DynamicBatteryStorage

Quite the opposite: Kerbalism will recommend that you remove DynamicBatteryStorage if it detects it. It's a listed incompatibility. DBS comes with Near Future Electrics.

5 hours ago, maja said:

Kerbalism will be the culprit. It removes modules of mods and use it's own in a lot of cases.

That is probably true in this case. The reason is that, in order to correctly handle resource/EC production for unloaded vessels and during time warp, Kerbalism has to use a custom implementation for resources and therefor cannot support part modules that generate EC without it knowing about it. That is why the reactor part modules are gone and you don't see the original UI that comes with it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just looked into this. For a proper Kerbalism support, all you need is determine if a vessel currently is powered or not, and skip the resource processing that is happening in BVController.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How have I lived without this mod for so long, and with so many rovers in many game saves?

iWJs60U.png

I've avoided the mod primarily because I love driving across the vistas of various worlds. With 1.8's retextures, more so than ever.

But there are days when I need to get things done, and driving for hours is a bit taxing. So, with Waypoint Manager also installed, I'm looking forward to many adventures in exploring every meter of most words. Thanks for keeping this mod up and running!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/5/2019 at 7:18 PM, maja said:

:cool::cool::cool:  (sorry :D )

There was change in the tech tree node for the part, because there are now part updates later in the tree, which affects unmanned penalties.

Check your difficulty settings, because buying parts depends on them.

I mean that now the bonvoyage module is unlocked before, in the technology tree?
I still have it next to the rover wheels. Does it apply to saved games?

Edited by jaunco325

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/11/2019 at 7:09 AM, jaunco325 said:

I mean that now the bonvoyage module is unlocked before, in the technology tree?
I still have it next to the rover wheels. Does it apply to saved games?

The base part is in the Control category, two updates for the stock tech tree are in Unmanned Tech and Automation categories and the third updated (for CTT) is in the Artificial Intelligence category. The updates reduce unmanned penalty.

The part placement in the tech tree was changed after introducing the part upgrades. What you see in the Unmanned Tech is the first upgrade.

Edited by maja

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I've got the mod working as intended - I think - and i can see it making little teleports with rovers over the course... BUT I've had multiple 'target' vehicles destroyed after the mode drove the rover to them and when I get into physical range it looks like they are on top of each other with the weaker vehicle spontaneously deconstructing itself immediately when in physics range. It would be nice to have a 'come close to' options that is not RIGHT ON TOP of the coordinates of the target ship.

How are others dealing with this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Atlas Gaming said:

How are others dealing with this?

Look at lat and lon boxes when you selecting your target. You can edit the numbers, leaving first two digits after dot is usually enough to arrive near a target, and then set it to recompute a route.

Btw, the little teleports are there due to inner workings of KSP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Other solutions I've used besides rounding/truncating the location:

  • Plant a flag (or some other small part that will be out of the way) at an 'arrival point' a few meters away, and target that.  (Knock the flag over if you can - it'll still work.)
  • If the rover is fairly slow, grab it when it's within a couple km of it's target but before it arrives, and drive the rest of the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DStaal said:

Other solutions I've used besides rounding/truncating the location:

  • Place a waypoint (I'm using Waypoint manager) at an 'arrival point' a few meters away, and target that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.