Jump to content

Space Race - RO/RSS/RP-0 (April 1956)


Recommended Posts

Ultimate Steve - January-March 1953 (Cycle 9)

3Im6VLp.png

 

Spoiler

The beginning of 1953 was eventful - three launches occurred. The first, on Jan 31, was Artemis 3. Artemis 2 was a planned lunar orbiter, but one of the uppity ups decided to postpone it until a lunar impactor had been sent, hence the need for Artemis 3. The launch would have been overkill even for a SkyRender Block 1B, so a new rocket was developed, called Super Monkey

Bs4wTQp.png

The rocket was the same diameter as SkyRender at 3m, and featured a more efficient upper stage (with low thrust, however, it takes ten minutes to deplete its fuel - a two engine variant is being considered. The core has decent TWR but the boosters were added just in case. A version with just two boosters is being considered as well.

All of that is moot, though, because it exploded shortly after launch.

PlfgEjD.png

Somehow, the probe survived, though.

X8zvtET.png

The problem was determined to be aerodynamic instability and a second attempt, Artemis 4, was made 20 days later, on February 20.

x4Be2z2.png

A lofted trajectory was chosen in order to give the upper stage long enough to do its job.

NuwqPeX.png

2qL0OWH.png

aPNld0P.png

The mission of crashing into the moon at high velocity achieved, and as well as gathering low science from two of the Moon's biomes, the mission was deemed successful.

Next up was Artemis 2, a lunar orbiter launching on a SkyRender Block 1A.

cHWrgD0.png

k3DxhVW.png

The second stage completed most of the TLI burn and it was finished off by the hydrazine powered probe.

As a side note, those solar panels currently take 2 days to build each, so rush build was definitely used - can't wait for better, less time consuming ones.

zXYfZwm.png

The lunar insertion burn was done, mostly successfully. However, due to inefficiencies and course corrections, not enough fuel remained to get into as low as wanted.

d1SmD2s.png

However, given enough time, Artemis 2 could get science from everywhere except the poles. Because of the groundbreaking nature of the mission, it was counted as a success although it would take longer to accomplish its objectives then was planned.

Launches - 3

Success - 2

Failure - 1

 

@qzgy you're up!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

qzgy - January-March 1953

jGtmsCt.png

Cephalopod Advanced Research Division - Still kicking themselves

Spoiler

January 21st was the launch of the Pearl1-2 probe into an 1124x920 km orbit. Nothing really to impressive or worth talking about.

7fiZwEU.png

MT8OVvJ.png

March 25th saw the launch of Cuttlefish 1.3U4 to fill another contract. Again, nothing to spectacular or worth talking about.

Since @NSEP is back, he has many things to talk about!

Edited by qzgy
Oh look. The date was wrong....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HUn5lQM.png

NSEP - June 1952 / March 1953 (Cycle, Seven ate nine)

Spoiler

8xL4b9i.png

August 1952, the NSEP launched their first solar powered satellite on an Alpha 120 rocket into a Polar Orbit, but failed due to a spacebar mishap. The NSEP declared it wasn't a big problem, since the next mission was going to do the same thing.

 

uaxsYd5.png

gkzdW5q.png

Novembre 1952, launch of the LSP 2, (Lunar Science Platform 2), the improved version was lighter, had solar panels, and had more science experiments carrying with it, was also intended to impact the Moon. LSP - 2 was launched on a Beta 110 rocket into a polar orbit, where it waited several days for its Transfer Window. It reached the Moon on December 15th, 1952

 

1fKidF9.png

December 27th, 1952. The NSEP finally researched the technology for orbital return. The first spacecraft to use this technology was accurately named the ''game changer''. The game changer launched on the Alpha 120 flew in a suborbital trajectory, and succesfully survived re-entry at 7200m/s, but its parachutes failed to open, and it crashed into the ocean. The mission was a partial succes.

 

2FGviNC.png

ZNvwSkg.png

January - Februari 1953. The NSEP solved the parachute problem, and was ready to launch a Human to space on the Alpha 120 with the game changer, but the launch was scrubbed, and Jebediah had to get out, because having a person onboard violated the contract. Game Changer did an unmanned launch again, this time it was a succes! Game changer succesfully splashed down on Februari 16th, 1953. The NSEP was now ready to launch a human into orbit on the Beta 110, within the next few months.

 

@Ultimate Steve, its your turn!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Ultimate Steve - April-June 1953 (Cycle 10)

3Im6VLp.png

 

Spoiler

On May 13, a strange satellite was launched, named "Object A" on a Super Monkey rocket.

7uvLi6U.png

The grass was also growing very tall at KSC, engulfing most of the land around the launch pad, and even most of the tracking station! The NSP's budget for lawn care will be increased.

ghr8Xx4.png

The launch was also the debut of Super Monkey DEUS, or Double Engine Upper Stage, as opposed to the ultra low TWR single engine upper stage that had flown previously. The orbit entered was polar, and the satellite was equipped with engines and RCS thrusters. No immediate movement was observed from Object A, leaving its purpose unknown...

On May 22, only nine days later, Euphoria 4, the second manned orbital mission was launched.

DZj6muy.png

The capsule contained Evgeniya Khvostovskaya (no way I'm spelling her name again, I'll call her Ek), a scientist, and veteran of one of the Diagon M flights. The flight also contained a new iteration of the ever changing service module, containing better propulsion systems, solar panels, and a large camera.

z61xX3B.png

Interestingly, after the completion of the orbital insertion burn, the second stage, which used the Block 1A restartable upper stage, remained attached to the capsule. The spacecraft was also launched into a polar orbit.

During her time in orbit, Ek used the camera over every single biome, resetting it after every use... BY EVA!

myz8Lcb.png

Several EVAs were made without issue, gathering EVA reports from above every biome as well. Later on, the second stage performed several more burns and...

iU56zpR.png

...Rendezvoused with the wrong object. Apparently, there were two objects marked "Object A Debris" and the upper stage had been chosen by mistake. Nevertheless, it was the NSP's first rendezvous. Samples of parts were collected from the engines for further analysis on how to build better engines. The rendezvous was attempted again, and... managed to target the decoupler from the upper stage by mistake. It was found that Object A, the target, was actually a quarter of an orbit behind, and that the targeting staff were obviously idiots... However, it demonstrated the Euphoria's service module performance and further qualified the hydrazine thrusters for further flight.

jncFeyO.png

The third time is a charm, they say! Several hours after launch, Ek went EVA again to retrieve several science experiments from Object A (although they have been done before so they don't net any science, but just to prove we could) and made detailed observations of Earth's reflection in the shiny metal skin of Object A.

In another startling move, Object A maneuvered itself so it was directly in front of Euphoria 4, and the two entered an intentional state of collision... Then, Euphoria started its engines.

PkqYQeW.png

While not a docking, the missions demonstrated the viability of docking maneuvers and reboosting between connected space objects. After most of Euphoria's fuel was burned, Object A separated and lit its own engines to reach an even higher orbit.

UzbayRR.png

Euphoria 4 then focused on its secondary objective - an attempt to remain in orbit for two days,. However about an hour from the needed deadline the batteries began running dangerously low. The solar panels had not worked as well as expected. The capsule was de-orbited.

WQcZX58.png

WjFtcqu.png

The landing was successful, although due to lack of control on reentry the capsule was oriented the wrong way and experienced crushing g forces on re-entry. Ek will not be flying for quite some time due to injuries sustained (yay, I don't ever have to spell her whole name again!).

On June 27, the final rocket of the quarter was launched, called Blind Spot 1. It launched on a Super Monkey single engine upper stage, as it had been delayed for several quarters due to other important launches and as a result used an older version of the rocket.

iutJvGL.png

Its job was to do something about the alarming comms gap over the Atlantic ocean by launching a geostationary satellite. It was successful, although due to my lack of understanding of RT I can't figure out how it works... I think for every launch I have to target the sat using the lifter and then target the lifter using the sat, which is time consuming.

 

Milestones - EVA in orbit, 5/22/53.

Launches - 3

Success - 2

Partial - 1. Euphoria 4 sustained high g force on reentry due to electrical failure and did not stay in orbit for two days, although it was in the air for two days and ten minutes, GRR! The duration was a secondary objective, but two minor shortcomings barely constitute this as a partial. The primary objectives, rendezvous, reboosting, EVA, and science, were all successful.

 

@qzgy, show me what you've got!

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ultimate Steve said:

although due to my lack of understanding of RT I can't figure out how it works... I think for every launch I have to target the sat using the lifter and then target the lifter using the sat

I might be wrong, but there should be an option to target "active vessel", that should connect to the rocket you currently control. Or, you might target "Earth",  and the cone will cover everything over the same hemisphere. Beware though, the antenna on the rocket has to be able to reach all the way to the commsat, RT doesn't use the square root method that stock comms system uses. And, if you have the time, RT has quite an extensive instructions over here: http://remotetechnologiesgroup.github.io/RemoteTech/

Michal.don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

qzgy - April-June 1953 (Cycle 10)

jGtmsCt.png

Cephalopod Advanced Research Division - Did a stupie AGAIN

Spoiler

Q3 saw 3 launches from CARD, as well as some minor facility upgrades

April 13th saw a Kalamari launch, carrying an unmanned probe.

z7eumpo.png

DiFNgZT.png

This was originally intended to go to the moon. However, porr planning and a lack of dV prevented that. It was repurposed as a CommSat (which we need anyways....) and sent into a 6000x6000 km orbit (approximately) and called the Conch 1. This was deemed a partial failure since the original mission failed but we got something good out of it.

June 1st saw the launch of the Humboldt 1, a new launcher capable of carrying around maybe lots of payload into orbit (more so it seems than other competitors :ph34r:). Which is good since I can't pilot that well to the moon yet.

1ndKVhN.png

WC6xAEH.png

Also a standard color scheme has been decided on by now for all future rockets. However, due to an oversight of the designer, no solar panels to recharge the batteries were included and the probe, titled Seashell II died in orbit. Engineers responsible have been fired. With this failure moon exploits have once again been pushed back... *sigh*

HYh1QSN.png

 

To close off the cycle, another Kalamari carrying a Conch CommSat was sent up to start the formation of a constellation on June 20th. Which went well and without anything of note.

iCdxROe.png

Launches/Successes/Partial Failures/Failures - 3/1/1/1

 

I believe also a new payload record is in order....

@NSEP is up again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HUn5lQM.png

NSEP - April / June 1953 (Cycle 10)

Spoiler

erIbirr.png

Z4vfY3u.png

H3NzJZU.png

vpiQGYv.png

CODk4zy.png

Xdpox9D.png

April 12th, 1953. The big day has struck, the first manned orbital spaceflight of the NSEP has begun, coincidentally, on the same day Yuri Gagarin took flight. Jebediah launched on the Game Changer-X spacecraft, launched by a Beta 110 launch vehicle. The mission was deemed a great succes, the NSEP is going to use the funds gathered by this mission to develop technologies for circumlunar return flights, that will eventually lead to manned spaceflight beyond LEO.

 

DlSlxsO.png

June, 1953. The NSEP planned their third Science mission to the moon wich was intended to orbit the Moon. It launched well and good, on a Beta 110 into a polar orbit, where it orbited for a month to wait for its launch window. On July 2nd, 1953, the NSEP attempted to fire the AJ10 rocket engine to boost the probe to the Moon, but because of low pressure, the engine failed to ignite. The mission was deemed a failure. Engineers think a micrometeorite hit the pressurized gas tanks, slowly depleting its pressure and making the transfer stage completely useless.

Show us what you got, @Ultimate Steve!

Edited by NSEP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Ultimate Steve - July-September 1953 (Cycle 11)

3Im6VLp.png

 

Spoiler

Many things happened this quarter for the NSP - five launches, to be exact - and four of them from the same family, as well as the debut of one new launch system, and two new configurations of the smaller launch system.

The first launch was called Object B, which launched on 7/12/53 on a Super Monkey V1.1. The Super Monkey had undergone several changes over the months, debuting in various flights, like engine and avionics upgrades. However, this was confusing and it was decided to make all of these changes standard, as well as the DEUS. The result was Super Monkey 1.1.

9NvfgZ9.png

0gb2qxZ.png

7MfPYfC.png

Object B's mission was to test out two new science experiments, the magnetometer and the orbital telescope. Unfortunately, it did not make it to high orbit (which IMO is ridiculously high) so it did not get as much science as planned. It was classes as a success, however, as nothing really went wrong with the spacecraft, just that someone forgot to check the altitude of high space.

yr3hjg0.png

Next up, on 8/11/53, was Artemis 6, on another Super Monkey V1.1. The launch went well, the mission was to impact the Moon (again). However, Artemis 5 has not launched yet, it is still under construction, and this one finished first, so I launched it first.

UH62pOJ.png

The moon was impacted, and the mission declared a success.

*DRAMATIC MUSIC*

*LOUD RUMBLE*

LZ8OGIB.png

And, liftoff of StarRender! This rocket, with 5/6 of the power of a Proton booster on the first stage, and a NK-9V on the second stage, is intended to be the NSP's new medium-heavy workhorse. Originally, there were supposed to be two rockets, a Medium one called Triton and a large one called StarRender, but they were merged and ended up towards the larger side. The launch occurred on 9/2/53.

dTtfXzE.png

5UY9j6O.png

No record of the payload mass has been found, but guestimation given the payload+empty S2 puts the payload somewhere around 22 tons. *evil laugh*

The payload was named Artemis 5, and it had two missions - a lunar communications orbiter, and a lunar lander. The insertion stage was powered by a restartable Kerolox engine with five ignitions, and the stage was named RUSH - Restartable Upper Stage Rocket. Yes, Rocket doesn't start with H but I can't think of a good acronym otherwise.

x17msYg.png

However, due to lack of cryogenic tank technology, the liquid oxygen boiled off early in the trip to the moon, leaving the orbiter part of the mission stranded.

8Q6muMD.png

The scientists tried to land the lander portion of Artemis 5 anyway, thinking it had the margin to deal with this.

jtmXEZL.png

Unfortunately, it was about 200m/s short of being able to land. The RUSH stage and lack of technology was blamed for the failure, although it was only a partial failure - the new launch vehicle functioned perfectly, and the out-of-fuel transfer stage entered solar orbit and got our first bit of science from the sun.

Next up on 9/23, Object C was launched on a new variant of Super Monkey, the 1.1S config.

EPKj8cn.png

The 1.1S was shorter overall, lacked the solid rocket boosters on the first stage, and used a single engine upper stage.

7uRjAlw.png

However, the revert to the SEUS proved a mistake as the stage took a full 15 minutes to exhaust its fuel, dipping back down into the atmosphere before running out of fuel due to high gravity losses. However, the probe managed to enter orbit, where it waited...

On 9/30, Object D was launched, again on a 1.1S but this time with a now-standard DEUS.

CBRP1jT.png

The probe safely reached orbit, and after a few hours...

ACLhHIU.png

 

23Q1h2n.png

...Docked with Object C, proving docking technology! Object D then fired its engines to boost the orbit of Object C which carried a high velocity reentry testbed. After Object D's fuel was depleted, it undocked and de-orbited while Object C lit its own engines and entered an orbit with an apogee a third of the way to the moon.

EVBS96l.png

However, the results of the heat shield test were unsatisfactory and (CLASSIFIED). (CLASSIFIED) will have to be developed for the upcoming (CLASSIFIED).

 

L/S/PS/F - 5/1/4/0. Man, something failed almost everywhere this quarter!

Milestone - first docking. 9/30/53.

 

@qzgy shall present his news...

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

qzgy - July-September 1953 (Cycle 11)

jGtmsCt.png

Cephalopod Advanced Research Division -Actually making progress!

Spoiler

Short one cause it really wasn't interesting.

July 24th saw the launch of Seashell 2.5 on the Humboldt HLV. It successfully went to the moon and made orbit around it. Yay! Finally....

oSNLetO.png

3XkG4wS.png

zpogQAB.png?1

The parasite impactor also worked flawlessly, impacting the moon as designed. (Good bye ya piece of crap)

0bGHS8D.png

Lw3tbqe.png

m5hdIhW.png

The rest of the cycle was spent on finally finishing off a 4 sattelite commnet contract which actually took like 6 sattelites to actually do since I was stupid and didn't really pilot the best. Oh well thats done.

m5hdIhW.png

 

VAB work was finished also this month as well as many upgrades to hopefully compete with the blistering pace of the NSP...

 

Launches/Successes/Partial Successes/Failure - 5/3/2

Milestones - Lunar orbit - July 24/25

@NSEP - Your turn again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

HUn5lQM.png

NSEP - July / September 1953 (Cycle 11)

Spoiler

phZWMR6.png

gw6tRNN.png

QYkUPrc.png

August 27th, 1953. Jebediah flew on the re-arranged version of the Game Changer, re-named ''Union'' (after the Soyuz spacecraft). The Union will serve as a test bed for future technologies and will probably be used in circumlunar flights. Jeb's mission was to do an EVA, but because of cold-welding, the hatch got stuck, and he could unfortunately not get out. Jebediah also forgot his water supply, wich means it had to do an in-orbit abort, the Union deorbited shortly after reaching orbit, and succesfully landed back home. The mission was deemed a partial failure.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Ultimate Steve - October-December 1953 (Cycle 12)

3Im6VLp.png

 

Spoiler

On 10/8, the Reacher 1 space probe was launched, the first dedicated mission to explore the sun.

3g1BpDL.png
 

The launch vehicle was a standard SkyRender Block 1A.

13Zbghi.png

The mission was a complete success, netting a solar apoapsis between Mars and Jupiter.

Next up, on 11/25, Euphoria 5 was launched, the third crewed orbital mission launched by the NSP.

EL2UZ8x.png
 

Onboard was Rostislav Grekov, and the mission was to obtain high orbit crewed science and test high velocity reentry using new heat shield technology. The extra velocity was provided by upgrades to the SkyRender lifter, leading to a new version, Block 1C with upgraded engines and lighter avionics. The service module was also reshuffled again.

gRQOVQT.png
 

The spacecraft was launched into a polar orbit in order to do biome science with mystery goo. However, goo does not do per biome science, as Rostislav discovered. And the spacecraft didn't have enough fuel to reach high space, which is stupidly high IMO. And to top it off, the solar panels were just barely not producing enough power, so Euphoria 5 was still limited in duration by electricity. After a few orbits, totaling 5 days in space, Rostislav returned to Earth, proving the new heat shield technology.

h9zkshL.png
 

For the third and final mission of the quarter, and the final mission of 1953, the Artemis 7 lunar lander probe was launched on the second flight of StarRender on 12/20.

 

4zXPkQE.png

The launch went off without any major problems.

The RUSH stage (Restartable Upper StagHe rocket) has been downgraded due to a lack of cryogenic tanks to the RUSH-A version, which is powered by 3 hypergolic AJ-10 engines.

FPib3EE.png

As a result of using RUSH-A, the fuel did not boil off and lunar orbit was achieved. Artemis 7's lander was detached shortly later.

m9BDBV9.png

The lander, running dangerously low on fuel, safely landed sometime around Christmas, netting many science points.

Ttvlf2O.png

 

3 launches, 2 successes, 1 partial success, 0 failures.

Milestone - Unmanned Lunar Landing, launched 12/20/53.

 

 

 

 

@qzgy you're next!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

qzgy - October - December 1953 (Cycle 12)

jGtmsCt.png

Cephalopod Advanced Research Division - Things are moving up maybe?

Spoiler

November 17th or so, the Limpet-Seashell was launched in an attempt to land on the moon first (before realizing the NSP already landed later that month *sigh*)

gEMbrjE.png

It was technically successful as it worked to get into orbit and setup a lunar flyby. However, that didn't count for much as it ran out of EC. Oh well. Sorta worked though. Also got launched wayyy out into space, past earth escape. So thats nice.

 

December 12th or 19th (date is unclear), a new realllly big launcher was used for the first time. Called the Atlantica, it carried a new 2 man long duration crew system called Dyopteryx.

JnWeN9B.png

In the haste to test it, the unmanned maiden flight was accidentally forgotten. Oops.

KZfv1Dp.png

Anyways, Diana Lyadova and Natalya Permyakova stayed in orbit for a whopping 7 days! Collecting much science from a new camera thingy the boffins dreamed up and going on EVA multiple times. (For the record probably December 19th or so)

oIbsWav.png

iu0Z6AX.png

After the nice long exile spaceflight, they deorbited without mishap. Minor scary moment when the lower lifesupport and OMS/RCS system came close but you know, could be worse.

LTFE8BS.png

They safely landed (although recovery crews took their sweet sweet time coming to them. Probably spent a day or so floating on the ocean. The mission was deemed a stunning success.

 

December 27th saw the launch of a Kalamari 1.6 to attempt and reach a geostationary orbit. That didn't quite happen though as there was not enough dV in the satellite. But hey, can't hurt that there's another comms sat in orbit. The more the merrier!

PkY2vK5.png

 

Launches/Successes/Partial Successes/Failure - 3/1/2/0

Milestones - 2 crew orbit (not official), EVA - December 19th

@NSEP I know, its been quick.

Edited by qzgy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
2 hours ago, michal.don said:

Is this thing still alive gents? Things started to look interesting, it would be a shame if it ended right now..... :)

 

NSEP is taking another break, I'll ask him when he'll be ready again. This will be finished eventually!

Edit: It appears that it's going to be a while.

Edited by Ultimate Steve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

Ultimate Steve - January-March 1954 (Cycle 13)

 

3Im6VLp.png

 

 

Spoiler

BREAKING NEWS

A top secret spacecraft was rolled out to the launch pad at Baikonur in the first few days of October, picked up by a US spy plane. This spacecraft looked something like this:

Image result for project orion nuclear

 

A launch was attempted on October 31, 1953, this news now just going public. Also, the NSEP launch facilities have been blown up and irradiated. The USSR is denying this launch ever happened, and have announced that they will no longer launch any rockets from Baikonur.

AKA NSEP got infected with "Real Life," an incredibly destructive virus that he may or may not recover from, and he has decided to drop out of the race for the time being.

 

In the wake of this nuclear tragedy, the Notebook Space Program continued to make progress despite detecting the radiation from the other side of the planet.

dyFFXYq.png

The third ever launch of StarRender took place on February 11. Its payload was referred to as "Object E" or "LIS" in official documents, but officials were rather quiet about this launch.

LcWRIQz.png

Object E reached Low Earth Orbit successfully, but unfortunately had to use some of its own fuel to do so. It appeared to be an ordinary RUSH-A hypergolic stage with a utility module on top. It did not immediately move to a different orbit.

Ten days later, on February 21st, George Cunningham launched into space on board Euphoria 6.

pMmVbui.png

This launch was fairly standard, and featured another version of Theseus' Service Module, this time featuring a full complement of RCS thrusters.

emSBn9j.png

The whole assembly then, in a surprising move, docked with Object E and burned the last of the fuel in the second stage of the SkyRender. Then, it turned around and fired the engines in the RUSH stage.

Several days later, the engines on the RUSH-A fired once more, bringing George Cunningham in to an elliptical orbit - of the Moon.

iIRELOx.png

*cue applause from mission control gif*

While everyone in Mission control was celebrating, a problem was noticed - the Delta-V readouts were looking alarmingly low. Very alarmingly low. The ship had been brought into an elliptical orbit instead of a low one due to this very problem. Maneuver nodes were plotted, and George had just enough fuel to get home if he burned all the fuel in the RUSH-A stage and his service module if he burned at perilune... in three week's time. Earlier and he would have to burn closer to apolune, which required more fuel and would leave George in an elliptical Earth Orbit.

The problem was that George's life support just barely would not last him three weeks plus the transfer time home. He would die of thirst a few hours before he reached the surface of Earth.

tn5AJrP.png

 

While the engineers were mulling over this problem, another spacecraft had made its way to the launch pad - Sparrow 12 carrying HARE, High Altitude Re-Entry, designed to test a sample return capsule.

EVIDdVG.png

It was also SSTO capable, although it didn't actually go into orbit. Due to lack of control on the re-entry pod and a steeper than planned angle (high TWR, no throttling, very low precision) the primary mission was a failure and the probe burned up during re-entry. The launch occurred on February 25.

XV3cFEO.png

Back to the whole "GEORGE IS DOOMED!" thing, the engineers had a plan. George would burn his fuel tanks dry to get into an elliptical Earth Orbit, and then Hero 1/Object F would launch. It launched on February 29.

GKRIQbm.png

Hero 1 was a small probe with basically nothing more than a docking port and a life support tank to tide George over until Hero 2/Object G could be launched - another RUSH-A stage that would push George back to Earth.

GjYXa9K.png

The docking was successful, much to George's delight. However, the engineers realized that they were all stupid. They were looking at the delta-V numbers for the service module WITH the empty RUSH-A stage still attached. Euphoria 6 had enough fuel to get into a Low-ish Lunar Orbit and return to Earth without needing two separate rescue missions.

*DERP*

So then Euphoria 6 returned to Earth - but wait. There were not enough solar panels on board. George would die due to lack of power before he got to Earth. GRR!

eCvDu06.png

Good news, bad news - George's EVA suit used less electricity than the command pod, so he could EVA a few hours at a time while the pod's systems were shut down. Still, it was very close, but George survived his mission, if only barely.

NglsTXH.png

 

To round out the quarter, a boring Commsat launch happened on a Super Monkey 1.1. Or maybe it was 1.2. These screenshots are at least 2 months old, I don't remember which version I'm on.

kUwEPsF.png

Apollo-13 moment over, the NSP engineers rejoiced, as they had placed George in orbit around the Moon, albeit briefly, only gaining a fraction of the science desired.

Now the question remained... What would they do with Hero 2/Object G, the rescue tug they had rushed to build but didn't need to use?

 

Milestone - Kerbal in Lunar Orbit, launched 2/21/54, arrival date unknown but a few days later.

Kerbals in space +1.

Launches: 5. 2 success, 2 partial success, 1 failure.

 

Don't panic, though, a lunar landing is still a long way off, and we just blew a lot of our budget on rushing to build the rescue missions. :p

 

 

@qzgy Time to bring this thing back to life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zzz..... Huh wait what? Oh ok.

qzgy - January - March 1954 (Cycle 13)

jGtmsCt.png

Cephalopod Advanced Research Division - What's this scribble mean?

Spoiler

According to notes left on the desk, seems that the only remarkable thing was the launch of a Limpet Commsat into geostationary orbit. It worked? Maybe? Probably I guess? (around about February 17th)

wyEBxb1.png

3xTAl30.png

hVi05Ku.png

Another launch seems to also have occurred (though are officially NOT on the record, so are without a date). The intended goal seems to have been land on the moon. It also appears to have rather landed quite hard, showering the old moon with new shiny bits of debris.

lCO27Np.png

Atlantica LV, cause it needs as much dV as possible.

eWE1KYA.png

eYcOmP4.png

N1sX4nX.png

bang clatter clatter. back to the drawing board......

 

Launches/Successes/Partial Successes/Failure - 2/1/0/1

@Ultimate Steve - Reviving in progress....

Edited by qzgy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ultimate Steve - April-June 1954 (Cycle 14)

 

3Im6VLp.png

 

Spoiler

After that emotional rollercoaster of a quarter, only one launch happened in the next one, Reacher 2 on May 9. The launch vehicle was a SkyRender Block IC.

TILqpat.png

Its mission was to fly by Mars, although there was great concern on whether its antenna would be able to work at such a distance. The escape burn was completed to an acceptable degree of accuracy.

Launches - 1. It's a success, so far, but that could easily change.

@qzgy Ping!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

qzgy - April - June 1954 (Cycle 14)

jGtmsCt.png

Cephalopod Advanced Research Division - Things? Maybe?

Spoiler

Only two launches this quarter. (Maybe. its entirely possible that lunar landing attempt was in this quarter.... records are fuzzy)

May 28th saw the launch of a Humboldt-Syrinx to try and land on the Moon. Again. It didn't work. Due to an engineering oversight, the EC generation was not sufficient. So it couldn't even maneuver to crash into the moon. Really gotta work on that though, times running out on the contract.......

NLurxjX.png

wJ8Z9Yo.png

June 4th saw the launch of a Humboldt-Seashell-Limpet C. Originally for a geostationary launch, it was decided instead to be used for a Molniya orbit. Orbit parameters ended up about 39000km by 600 km

Izw4aNX.png

evksFXB.png

Wosm16j.png

A new launch vehicle has also been built, with promising performance and using new bits from the people in the science labs. Untested, of course. But it should be fun! More upgrades to facilities are also planned given the distinct size of some of the future planned payloads......

 

Launches/Successes/Partial Successes/Failures - 2/1/0/1

@Ultimate Steve - Might be the last one for a bit. (week, week and a half)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ultimate Steve - July-September 1954 (Cycle 15)

 

 

3Im6VLp.png

 

Spoiler

This was supposed to be a slow quarter, but nahhhh!

On 7/6/54, Artemis 8 was launched on a standard StarRender launch vehicle.

aNQRNEH.png

It was the first launch of a RUSH-B upper stage. I literally named my rocket stages like that only so I could make that joke. Cryogenic tank technology had been researched, meaning that the vision of the original RUSH stage could be realized - a kerolox restartable long duration upper stage. Its payload, the Artemis 8 lander, used a new engine, the Astris, imported from Germany. It was pressure fed and infinitely restartable, while having a decent efficiency advantage over the previously used AJ-10. The lander would test the practicality of landing larger scientific payloads on the Moon. All in all, this mission was going to be groundbreaking.

However it had launched down the southern launch corridor, rather than the north one where there was more groundstations. It exited communications range. The payload was so heavy that the RUSH-B stage had to fire to reach LEO, but the command to separate the stage could not be sent due to the lack of a communications link. As a result, Artemis 8 was lost.

 

Since we can't build groundstations in the middle of the pacific, it was decided that we'd have to decrease the burn time to remain above the horizon. The decision was made to upgrade StarRender's upper stage from one engine to two.

mzesjQV.png

One month later, on 8/6/54, the Object G/Hero 2 mission was launched, which was, if you recall, the mission designed to rescue Euphoria 6. It was not necessary and has been sitting in the hangar for a few months. So, given all that had gone wrong with that mission, the NSP had REALLY WISELY opted to use the extra stage to do the exact same mission.

EM1pwxc.png

The astronaut chosen for this mission, Euphoria 7, was Rostislav Grekov. In this mission, launched 8/7/54, he became the first NSP astronaut to fly into orbit twice, and the first to fly into space 3 times. He had previously flown a Diagon-M flight as well as Euphoria 5, the elliptical orbit mission. The other astronauts were not happy about this as some of them had yet to orbit, but this was because the other scientist had gotten sick at the last minute.

o98PPa8.png

pAy8rxI.png

umB2Qcx.png

The mission was targeted for a low polar lunar orbit, which was a demanding mission profile, but it would gather much science. Unfortunately, there was not enough fuel to get low enough to survey all of the biomes. Only one biome that had not been surveyed by Euphoria 6 was surveyed by Euphoria 7. This was disappointing. When it came time to return, Rostislav burned the engines one last time to return to Earth a few days later.

t9IHd94.png

And ran out of fuel, not 50m/s short.

So, let's rescue another lunar astronaut, shall we?

6Ecw9P9.png

Hero 3/Object H was launched on a SkyRender block IC carrying extra fuel and life support supplies on 8/19/54. It docked to Euphoria 7 on its perigee pass, reduced its apogee, and de-orbited it one pass later.

oNjQXJo.png

One day earlier, on 8/18/54, Reacher 3 had launched to Venus, also on a SkyRender block IC.

QHblfMt.png

Two weeks later, on 9/5/54, Artemis 9 was launched, which was a copy of Artemis 8, except with the new double engine upper stage on the StarRender booster.

EnxZk9E.png

RUSH-B fired two times to get Artemis 9 onto a lunar intercept trajectory (It only had five starts available, so that's crucial). It was intended to fire at least once more to get Artemis 9 into a low lunar orbit, but unfortunately the insulation was not good enough. The liquid oxygen boiled off before the spacecraft reached the moon.

UrdjrHp.png

No problem, however - the Artemis 9 lander had been designed to land a much larger scientific payload on the moon than what had been loaded for this mission. It had more than enough margin to accomplish its primary mission of landing on the Moon - enough margin to also perform the insertion burn. The secondary mission, however, now had even lower margins. You can probably guess the secondary mission if you look closely at the spacecraft.

oQWJSOq.png

The spacecraft successfully touched down and performed numerous science experiments (read: only 5). It still had fuel remaining, and tried to fly to another biome. It did not reach the biome before fuel margins for the secondary mission got to critical, so the secondary mission began.

IntPBmf.png

The four side tanks, now empty, detached. The engine fired again, placing the tiny science package on a trajectory that took it to lunar orbit and beyond - back to Earth.

6sKAjer.png

The reentry module did not perform well. It had only been tested once before, on Sparrow 13/HARE, and that was a failure. First, the parachute exploded. Then everything else exploded despite being behind the heat shield. The heat shield, however, survived and splashed down in the ocean, exploding. Technically, something has now been to the moon and back, it just hit Earth a bit fast.

No contracts for sample return had been accepted, though, as the odds of a successful mission had been low. Artemis 9 is considered partially successful as the sample return phase was only the secondary mission.

At this point a decree was made to not use Euphoria spacecraft to travel around the Moon again, as both missions had nearly ended with an astronaut fatality. The next phase of lunar exploration, as well as LEO operations, would be carried out by the NSP's next generation spacecraft - Dream.

Dream, a 3 man spacecraft, would be launched by StarRender Block II, an upgraded, man-rated version of StarRender. The main differences would be a second upper stage engine (already implemented), two more small upper stage engines (not implemented) to use after the main two to reduce end-of-burn g-forces, and shutting off first stage engines at a certain point to reduce end-of-burn g-forces on the first stage (also not implemented).

Dream has actually been under planning for several months now, and all of the technology to build it is not actually researched yet, but enough has been unlocked to do a pad abort test of a boilerplate capsule.

q3oA5Ah.png

Dream 1 was launched on 9/29/54. The test was a complete success. The spacecraft, escape system, and parachutes performed perfectly. At this point, the optimistic plan was to do one inflight abort test, an unmanned orbital test, and then a manned test, but coming from someone who knows the future, it didn't really work out that way, unfortunately.

 

Launches - 7 (!). Success - 3. Partial - 3. Fail - 1.

People in space +1.

 

Note to qzgy, don't panic about the high flight rate this quarter, one launch was prebuilt and one was rushed, so it's really only 5 launches worth of capability.

 

 

 

@qzgy You're up, but you can take your time as you said it might be a while!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

qzgy - July - September 1954 (Cycle 15)

jGtmsCt.png

Cephalopod Advanced Research Division - Only five launches he says. ONLY. >_>

Spoiler

After a small hiatus, CARD launched many things and did many things this quarter.

First was another commsat for the geostationary network, Limpet C III. It was placed behind Limpet C II in a very boring nominal launch of an Ikameshi III Launcher, the replacement for the Humboldt launcher,  on July 13th. The Ikameshi is capable of taking 10 tons to LEO. What that'll be used for is yet to be found out. I think its also built faster than the Humboldt which is a nice bonus.

yKlFrjW.png

BxxMZLS.png

August 29th saw the launch of the Ikameshi III with the Darn it, named because people were getting frustrated with the inability to actually land on the moon for stupid reasons. Such as running out of comms range, runnning out of EC, running out of fuel (I think you see the pattern forming)

ncAp8MS.png

After getting into orbit, it boosted on a transfer stage with an Agena engine to the Moon. And got there after several days, without much mishap

ktNDIuX.png

BnRllgp.png

Then lowered its orbit a bit in preparation for landing.

EEVu3Pi.png

hFXYC28.png

And landed! FINALLY! A probe on the Moon!

kgOHDpL.png

iLa0NJ8.png

9kcEfIu.png

It then proceeded to transfer some science. I say some, though really it about doubled the science back at the lab.

September 21st saw the launch of the last Limpet C into geostationary orbit. Which was completely boring, but gave us a million funds to play with which is nice. Those are likely to be burned on facility upgrades.

ErRFPjq.png

And for the last launch of the quarter on September 29th, an Ikameshi heavy with a new Cosmos capsule! The new three kerb capsule probably going to be used for most of the rest of the program. Maybe. Think it might need a docking port stitched onto it. And also an extended fuel tank and a new engine. But the capsule is probably going to stay about the same. Probably. Tests show that it worked fine. Improvements in engines and maneuvering systems and the like will come, but later.

0mGH5sr.png

What makes this a heavy? An extra 2 RD253 engines for more power. Because heavy things need heavy things

WyvwrOJ.png

zn3jvEq.png

This was also a test of a slightly higher orbit. Nothing too too special. Oh and also had some extra science bits on it.

c2PRrtl.png

lGgc932.png

Nominal landing, Probably quite fine.

 

Launches/Successes/Partial Successes/Failures - 4/4/0/0

Milestones - Lunar Landing- September 6th or so.

@Ultimate Steve Perhaps we should think about doing longer periods of time? 6 months instead of 3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, for if you ever start over or if anyone else is planning to run something similar, you may be interested in a mod of mine, Race Into Space, built for just this sort of asynchronous multiplayer.  It tracks when each player achieved various milestones (defined in terms of CC contracts), and gives extra funds rewards to whoever got them first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, soundnfury said:

BTW, for if you ever start over or if anyone else is planning to run something similar, you may be interested in a mod of mine, Race Into Space, built for just this sort of asynchronous multiplayer.  It tracks when each player achieved various milestones (defined in terms of CC contracts), and gives extra funds rewards to whoever got them first.

Hmm, this sounds like a cool idea!

 

On 8/10/2018 at 1:45 PM, qzgy said:

@Ultimate Steve Perhaps we should think about doing longer periods of time? 6 months instead of 3?

I guess that would be alright, although the next thing is a Q4 so we should probably finish the year off with 3 months so we can do H1 and H2 instead of two quarters of different years. The next 3 months for me is coming later tonight if all goes well.

Also we should consider keeping it at 3 because of the time it takes to load the page with so many images... If we started putting twice as much content per post then the pages would require more time to load.

I will update the stats before I post my next update. I'll have the time, I'm staying up for the PSP launch. Congrats on the landing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...