2+2=4

[JERONIMO]

becuze

1+1*2/2*4/2+1

or √4 = 2

or 2*2

or 1+1+1+1=4

or 8-1-1-1-1=4

or 8/2

or 2+2=4

 

[NSEP]

-1 thats 3 quick maths

Spoiler

Sorry i had to

 

[razark]

Two plus two is five, because the Party says so.

[TheSaint]

9 minutes ago, razark said:

Two plus two is five, because the Party says so.

You have won the victory over yourself?

[razark]

Just now, TheSaint said:

You have won the victory over yourself?

I love Big Brother.

[TheSaint]

3 minutes ago, razark said:

I love Big Brother.

If there is hope, it lies in the Proles.

[YNM]

19 minutes ago, TheSaint said:

If there is hope, it lies in the Proles.

Proles and animals are free.

[Bill Phil]

There are four lights!

[StrandedonEarth]

All equations are created equal. 

But some are more equal than others

[razark]

16 minutes ago, StrandedonEarth said:

All equations are created equal. 

But some are more equal than others

That's the wrong book!  You have been reported to the Ministry of Love as a thought criminal!

[kerbiloid]

Quote

 

2+2=4

Depends on epsilon.

5 hours ago, razark said:

That's the wrong book!

So, you find having hard copies of books normal? Are you not fine with screens?

Edited August 11, 2018 by kerbiloid

[Kernel Kraken]

20 hours ago, TheSaint said:

If there is hope, it lies in the Proles.

Thought criminal.

11 hours ago, kerbiloid said:

 

So, you find having hard copies of books normal? Are you not fine with screens?

How would he get ahold of books if the firemen had already destroyed them all?

[kerbiloid]

2 minutes ago, Kernel Kraken said:

How would he get ahold of books if the firemen had already destroyed them all?

Sounds like you disagree with them.

If have a screen why need a book?

[Kernel Kraken]

1 minute ago, kerbiloid said:

Sounds like you disagree with them.

If have a screen why need a book?

You don't have a choice of screen nor book, for all of the books have been destroyed.

[kerbiloid]

7 minutes ago, Kernel Kraken said:

all of the books have been destroyed.

You said it twice. Looks like the book optimization theme causes a discomfort for you.

How long ago did you visit your local Bureau of Mental Comfort and Serenity last time?
Is your Mental Officer aware of your problem?

Edited August 11, 2018 by kerbiloid

[Kernel Kraken]

Just now, kerbiloid said:

You said it twice. Looks like the book optimization theme causes a discomfort for you.

How long ago did you visit your local Bureau of Mental Comfort and Serenity last time?

Gosh dangit dude...

Spoiler

It's Farenheit 451. Books have been burned up by the firemen.

 

[p1t1o]

On 8/11/2018 at 4:28 PM, kerbiloid said:

Sounds like you disagree with them.

If have a screen why need a book?

A book is a screen.

It just has a limited refresh rate and runs an extremely rudimentary operating system.

But the graphics fidelity is off the charts and it has an advanced haptic-feedback interface. There is also an olfactory age-indicator.

Edited August 15, 2018 by p1t1o

[YNM]

3 minutes ago, p1t1o said:

A book is a screen.

It just has a limited refresh rate...

... Clearly you don't know of minitrue, then.

[sevenperforce]

2 + 2 = 4.00000006 ⁺/_- 0.00000007

[Superfluous J]

2+2=5 for very large values of 2.

[kerbiloid]

Caucasus languages have a category "approximate numerals".
Say, 2 = "tkhy", 3 = "shchy",  so, "zytkhyshch" = "about 2-3"

So, speaking a proper language, you can get even 2+2=18

Edited August 17, 2018 by kerbiloid

[Mad Rocket Scientist]

2+2 approaches 4 with increasing precision of calculation. You won't need to worry about that until calculus, in the meanwhile just graphically approximate.

[TheSaint]

2+2=4 +/- 2% for instrument error and gauge readability.

[kerbiloid]

Why at all use this naive notation: "2 + 2 = 4" ?

As we presume that these values are more or less equal, it's better to write this as 

2 + 2 - 4 → 0
or
|2 + 2 - 4| < ε

[Mad Rocket Scientist]

Solving 2 + 2 = 4 for 2, we get 2 = 2 or 0 = 0. Please don't leave unsimplified equations lying around, someone might get hurt.