HolidayTheLeek Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 (edited) Welcome to the... KSP Stock Prop Design Challenge! The aim of this challenge is to create the coolest looking stock prop designs you can! Your plane will be judged mostly on appearance and as such, speed and performance won't be judged very harshly; as long as it flies, and flies well enough it's okay (though good performance is always good to have). The goal of this challenge is to create a plane that fits both the requirements and aesthetics of what a contract of your choice says. The contracts will range from 1920s-30s biplanes to post WW2 superprops. There will be no definitive winner to this challenge, but aircraft I especially enjoy will have a spot on this original post. Please lay out your submission like this: [Contact No. XY][Generation (biplane, ww2 etc)][Manufacturer name/author(s)][Craft name][Description][Pictures (max 3)][Download link (preferably on KerbalX)] Guidelines/Rules 1) Unless otherwise stated in the contract, the plane must fly only with stock propellers. 2) The Design MUST be original and NOT a replica. 3) Stock designs only. DLC is not allowed. 4) Part clipping/craft file editing is allowed. ----- The Idea The idea for this challenge was blatantly ripped off HB Stratos' and Servo's Original Jet Fighter challenge. If you've stumbled here but aren't a fan, or don't know how to make props, visit their challenge instead: Major thanks to HB Stratos for letting me actually make this challenge even it's literally the same thing. ----- The Contracts Biplane Era Spoiler Contract No. #001 (by myself) Biplane Era The Army Air Corps requires a new fighter aircraft to replace the surplus WW1 fighters already in service. The fighter needs to be fast, nimble and have a biplane format as they aren't sold on the new cantilever winged monoplanes. The fighter must be armed with at least one .30cal gun and one .50cal gun. This plane is supposed to be small, but rugged enough to work on dirt runways on the front lines. It must also have a short takeoff and landing for these sorts of runways as well. The Navy is also willing to buy if the aircraft is capable of landing on carriers. Take inspiration from post WW1 fighters like the Hawker Fury, Ki-10, Gloster Gladiator or He-51. Spoiler Contract No. #002 (by myself) Biplane Era The Army Air Corps is looking for a medium/heavy bomber which can drop at least 4-5 bombs. This bomber must be well defended with gunners or quick enough to evade enemies for daylight operations. Two engines are preferred for redundancy on long flights in case one engine fails, however single engined designs are still allowed. Take inspiration from late ww1 bombers like the Zeppelin-Staaken RVI, Vickers Vimy, Handley Page Type O, and post-war designs like the Hawker Hart light bomber, Short Overstrand, or the Keystone B-6. ----- WW2 Era Spoiler Contract No. #003 (by myself) WW2 Era The Army Air Force requires a monoplane new fighter interceptor to replace it's older pursuit biplanes. To keep the fighter small and nimble, a single engined design is preferred. The fighter needs to be fast, have a good rate of climb and be armed with at least eight .30cals, or four .50cals or two 20mm cannons; if possible, greater armaments are preferred. The aircraft must be able to operate on short dirt runways similar to the biplanes it's replacing; STOL capability is preferred. Take inspiration from ww2 fighter-interceptors like the Spitfire, Hawker Hurricane, and P-40 Warhawk. Spoiler Contract No. #004 (by myself) WW2 Era More and more heavy bombers aren't coming back from their missions. A brand new, long ranged fighter escort is required. Twin engined or single engined designs will be accepted. The aircraft must be able to take off from home runways/carriers, fly far to the enemy front lines, and return. If possible, a light payload of one or two bombs will be accepted. The Navy is also willing to buy if this new fighter is able to take off and land from carriers. Take inspiration from fighters like the P-51 Mustang, P-38 Lightning and the Japanese A6M Zero. Spoiler Contract No. #005 (by PhantomAerospace) WW2 Era In Summer 1935, sensing growing hostilities In Europe, the USAAF and British Bomber command see the necessity of a four engine long range self defending bomber to carry at least two tons of ordinance at a speed no less than 45m/s with at least one rotating turret and three additional gun emplacements with a crew of 4 (pilot, navigator/radio operator, bombardier, gunners, one per rotating turret). Take inspiration from bombers like the B-17, Avro Lancaster, and B-24. Note: More advanced bombers (stuff like the B-29) can also be submitted to this category. Note II: More than or less than four engines will be accepted Spoiler Contract No. #006 (by myself) WW2 Era The Navy is in need of a carrier-borne strike aircraft to defend it's increasingly vulnerable fleet. The aircraft must be able to carry either a torpedo, bombs, or 4 unguided rockets. The aircraft must be durable and easy to maintain for usage on carriers and be relatively easy to land as well. A Radial engined design is preferred however inline engined designs will still be accepted. A gunner for defending the aircraft is optional. Take Inspiration from aircraft like the TBF Avenger, SBD Dauntless, Fairey Firefly and the Aichi D3A. Spoiler Contract No. #007 WW2 Era The Army is in need of a CAS (close air support) aircraft to defend it's troops and tanks on the ground. The aircraft must carry four or more unguided rockets, or be armed with a big enough gun to take out targets from the air. The aircraft can be either single, or twin engined. The attacker must be able to stay up in the air for awhile and be strong/heavily armoured enough against small arms AA (anti air). A rear gunner or good enough performance is needed against the threat of enemy fighters. Take inspiration from aircraft like the JU-87 Stuka, A-26 Invader, IL-2 Sturmovik, P-47 Thunderbolt and Hawker Tempest. ----- Postwar Era Spoiler Contract No. #008 Postwar Era The Air Force is still not convinced on whether jet aircraft would completely replace piston aircraft. As a result, the Air Force is in need of a superprop capable of matching the performance in early jet aircraft. Single or twin engine designs are allowed, but for single engined designs, contra-rotating propellers are encouraged. The aircraft must have heavy armament to defend against bombers or more heavily armoured jet fighters. Take inspiration from the Spitfire Mk 24, Seafire FR 47, P-51H, La-11, Hawker Tempest II, J7W1 and the MB.5. Spoiler Contract No. #009 Postwar Era There has been some uncertainty to whether pure jet aircraft would be able to perform on carriers due to their high landing speeds and slow acceleration. At the same time, pure piston aircraft are already showing their limits and cannot be improved much further. To remedy this, the navy needs you to design a mixed propulsion aircraft with jets and a propeller motor to get the best of both worlds. As a carrier aircraft, the design needs strong landing gear, a tailhook and low landing speeds. The aircraft needs to be on par against land based pure jet aircraft in speed or maneuverability or even both! Take inspiration from aircraft like the Ryan Fireball or the proposed late war motorjet aircraft from the soviet union. But as not many of these were made, feel free to let loose creatively but conform to the aesthetic of late 40s to early 50s aircraft. Note: Turboprop aircraft like the Westland Wyvern also count as 'mixed propulsion' --- Hall of Fame! @Jon144's fantastic K4F Scimitar is on the list because of it's superb performance; the best so far! While not as detailed as some of the other props, it's fast, and maneuverable enough to compensate. Good job! Spoiler --- @erasmusguy's HF-108 fantastically detailed. It doesn't quite fit a category, but looks superb. I appreciate the detail added to it; especially the little men/RCS tanks. Well done. Spoiler --- @Phantomic's P-45 bolt just looks like a plane straight from WW2. It has nice clean lines and isn't a bad flier either. Fits the contract almost perfectly. Great work! Spoiler ---- Edited March 19, 2019 by HolidayTheLeek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.