Triop

What should I do next ?

What should I do next ?  

24 members have voted

  1. 1. Right now I'm still on my Elcano trip, but what should I do after that ?

    • Go to the deepest point of Kerbin
    • Go to the highest point of Kerbin


Recommended Posts

A poll asking for a next op from someone named Triop... and it ends at only two options. I am disappoint.

But I will help. It has to be fitting with the other two, of course. You have highest, and deepest... how about right in between?

Challenge: find the stretch of (barely) dry land where you can drive the longest distance in a perfectly straight line while maintaining a constant altitude of 0m. Stock altimeter accuracy will be accepted.

Become famous now. Say no to elevations and descents. Accept your inner ASL. Make that zero-point drive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jacke Why not both ?

Ok, let me rephrase it, which one first ? ;)

17 minutes ago, swjr-swis said:

Challenge: find the stretch of (barely) dry land where you can drive the longest distance in a perfectly straight line while maintaining a constant altitude of 0m. Stock altimeter accuracy will be accepted.

Become famous now. Say no to elevations and descents. Accept your inner ASL. Make that zero-point drive

YoRoIWV.png

F3gfghD.png

giphy.gif

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Triop said:

@Jacke Why not both ?

Ok, let me rephrase it, which one first ? ;)

Go from the deepest to the highest in one drive.

Then do it again on Eve. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jacke said:

Go from the deepest to the highest in one drive.

Then do it again on Eve. :)

You know I'm allergic for everything above 70.000 km, right ? :cool:

 

3 minutes ago, Jacke said:

Go from the deepest to the highest in one drive.

I was actually seriously thinking about that for a moment...

But I would revers it then, go from the highest point to the deepest.

It does make sence somehow imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Triop said:

But I would revers it then, go from the highest point to the deepest.

Why I suggest going from deepest to highest is:

1.  The deepest is closer to KSC.

2.  You're likely to be able to get to the deepest location and back out again, as I think the sea bed will not be steeply sloped, but at the highest, you may have terrain that will block you.  And getting down might be risky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Jacke said:

You're likely to be able to get to the deepest location and back out again, as I think the sea bed will not be steeply sloped

I'm planning on doing this James Cameron style: A diving bell attached to a KAS winch. It would be cool designing a boat that can do that.

11 minutes ago, Jacke said:

but at the highest, you may have terrain that will block you.  And getting down might be risky.

Yeah, I will need some serious power or a clever route to pull that off.

Getting down will be suicide. . .  :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We ALREADY went to the deepest point! OK, OK, we got close.

KAS Winch?!? No, oil rig! with hidden mini-sub! This one can reach 800m deep, surely you can do better! (I grant you, I've only ever docked three of those 75+m drill strings together in the field, because underwater docking is HARD.)

Nd68LyM.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, FleshJeb said:

We ALREADY went to the deepest point! OK, OK, we got close.

O wow, I forgot about that one. . . &)

20 minutes ago, FleshJeb said:

No, oil rig! with hidden mini-sub!

That is a whole other story called "The Ore Wars". But because drilling ore is so slow in the game it is not profitable.

svqSoxX.png

8f3pxK4.png

NLCjTc7.png

Some CFG moding could help building a global ore company drilling rich ore all over the planet.  :ph34r:

20 minutes ago, FleshJeb said:

This one can reach 800m deep, surely you can do better! (I grant you, I've only ever docked three of those 75+m drill strings together in the field, because underwater docking is HARD.)

That's a BEAST ! :o

Edited by Triop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jacke said:

Why I suggest going from deepest to highest is:

1.  The deepest is closer to KSC.

2.  You're likely to be able to get to the deepest location and back out again, as I think the sea bed will not be steeply sloped, but at the highest, you may have terrain that will block you.  And getting down might be risky.

Hmmmm . . . . I could design a ship that has a rover and a sub and do them both in one mission . . .

DnpXgkB.png

@purpleivan is doing a awesome crazy mission with a ship with a rover, so why not ?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Triop said:

Hmmmm . . . . I could design a ship that has a rover and a sub and do them both in one mission . . .

 

Spoiler

DnpXgkB.png

 

@purpleivan is doing a awesome crazy mission with a ship with a rover, so why not ?

 

Exactly!  But cooler still would be taking out a negative buoyancy rover with water jets that goes along the bottom of the ocean until it comes up on shore near the highest mountain.  Then it jettisons its underwater gear (or you drive it a few kilometres, same result) and goes for the summit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Jacke said:

But cooler still would be taking out a negative buoyancy rover with water jets that goes along the bottom of the ocean until it comes up on shore near the highest mountain.  Then it jettisons its underwater gear (or you drive it a few kilometres, same result) and goes for the summit.

giphy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a Subnautica fan I am going to have to cast my vote for deepest point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Jacke said:

Go from the deepest to the highest in one drive.

I'm working on it, like my concept ? &)

DarjVV9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Triop said:

 

8f3pxK4.png

Hold on, how in the world is your kerbal walking underwater? Don't they normally just float to the surface?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, JacobTheFoxx said:

Hold on, how in the world is your kerbal walking underwater? Don't they normally just float to the surface?

Hush. It was right after the holiday feeding frenzy, and Valentina is still touchy about the subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, swjr-swis said:

Hush. It was right after the holiday feeding frenzy, and Valentina is still touchy about the subject.

Ohhhh okay, my apologies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, JacobTheFoxx said:

Hold on, how in the world is your kerbal walking underwater? Don't they normally just float to the surface?

@Martian Emigrant Had the solution:

"I edited the quicksave file.

Found Jeb then scrolled to his resources.

Replaced the "EVA Propellant" with "Ore" (Spelt those ways).

Made the quantity 20 (8 made Jeb sink but very slowly)(20 was a good sink speed and he walks and run quite normally. Jumps a bit low me think).

On the subsequent reload the game added the Eva Propellant back.

EDIT:

I have been playing with the Ore while on the bottom.

With 7.3 Jeb as a slight sink. When he jumps he can swim and eventually touches bottom. Or swim to an upslope and makes contact.

The RCS fails and is stowed on it's own. "

x4CEKR5.png

IwXm5QS.png

Edited by Triop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, JacobTheFoxx said:

Hold on, how in the world is your kerbal walking underwater? Don't they normally just float to the surface?

I found a easier way, a simple mod.

Control makes you sink and shift makes you go up.

https://kerbal.curseforge.com/projects/ker-plunk

It works in 1.6.1.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny that you remember that Ore trick.

I thought that was gone in the "Mists of times".

I was thinking recently about that as I have been looking for something to do and was entertaining the idea of making subs again.

 

And learn how to edit textures in KSP. That or learn to use kOS.

 

So little time. So much to know.

 

ME

 

318ShgMd27L.jpg

Edited by Martian Emigrant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you installed KIS you could carry ballast in the Kerbals own inventory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not KIS building a base on the ocean floor?

Yes, I know that @Triop is disliking of mods, but KIS in my opinion should be stock 1. It would be possible for people to use, 2. its just that good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Fraston said:

Why not KIS building a base on the ocean floor?

Yes, I know that @Triop is disliking of mods, but KIS in my opinion should be stock 1. It would be possible for people to use, 2. its just that good

Building a base there is a good idea, I like it.

I agree that KIS (and KAS) should be stock, indeed I'm not a fan of mods, but as long as they don't interfere with my flying or driving gameplay I make some exceptions. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  1. Mv1BpsB.png?1
  2. That plane on reddit should be named the Llewellyn Dowd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now