Nertea

[1.9.x] Dynamic Battery Storage: electrical/thermal planning and timewarp compensation (Feb 20)

Recommended Posts

I see, thanks. Reason I asked, I happened to send a probe to Eeloo, part of it was a satellite with probe core, ScanSat parts, and just enough RTGs to satisfy all EC requirements for scanning. On paper at least it was. Turned out, I was 0.05 EC short :( 

With this mod, I could have avoided this, I thought, but as I said earlier, I couldn't find the respective consumers, hence I asked :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, VoidSquid said:

I see, thanks. Reason I asked, I happened to send a probe to Eeloo, part of it was a satellite with probe core, ScanSat parts, and just enough RTGs to satisfy all EC requirements for scanning. On paper at least it was. Turned out, I was 0.05 EC short :( 

With this mod, I could have avoided this, I thought, but as I said earlier, I couldn't find the respective consumers, hence I asked :) 

I believe some work on my and on their side is needed for ScanSat to be compatible. However, I looked and I don't actually think the stock scanners use EC at all so there should be no issue there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Nertea said:

I believe some work on my and on their side is needed for ScanSat to be compatible. However, I looked and I don't actually think the stock scanners use EC at all so there should be no issue there. 

Stock scanners are ScanSat scanners - ScanScat patches the scanning capability into them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Released 2.1.3:

  • Added support for NF Exploration

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Urk I left the debug switch on, so 2.1.4 is a thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of quick curiosity, how much might this this mod's calculations and caching slow down load times (for the VAB or in general) on a midrange CPU?

EDIT: Nevermind, this information is readily available through the timestamps in the KSP.log file. Thanks for the mod!

Edited by nwillard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is likely an incompatibility with this mod and the latest Kopernicus release (1.8.1). Please be patient - I have tested a fix, but need to verify it works with the latest release version. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI, there some kind of issue with this mod, CryoTanks and the 1.8.1 recompile of B9ProceduralWings where a bunch of NREs are created(

: Multiple ModuleCryoTank nodes found with identical or no moduleName). It can be fixed pretty easily by deleting the B9ProceduralWings patch CFG in CryoTanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, dlrk said:

FYI, there some kind of issue with this mod, CryoTanks and the 1.8.1 recompile of B9ProceduralWings where a bunch of NREs are created(

: Multiple ModuleCryoTank nodes found with identical or no moduleName). It can be fixed pretty easily by deleting the B9ProceduralWings patch CFG in CryoTanks.

The perils of user submitted patches. I guess there is some way that the tanks are getting patched that is not in that file now.

Would be nice if you could drop a MM cache/log here so I can investigate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Nertea said:

The perils of user submitted patches. I guess there is some way that the tanks are getting patched that is not in that file now.

Would be nice if you could drop a MM cache/log here so I can investigate.

I'll do that when I get home. Didn't before because it seemed harmless to remove the patch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/26/2020 at 8:23 PM, dlrk said:

FYI, there some kind of issue with this mod, CryoTanks and the 1.8.1 recompile of B9ProceduralWings where a bunch of NREs are created(

: Multiple ModuleCryoTank nodes found with identical or no moduleName). It can be fixed pretty easily by deleting the B9ProceduralWings patch CFG in CryoTanks.

Well now I feel a bit guilty - I contributed that patch, back in the day. 

Do you have ModularFuelTanks? I've never played with it so I neglected to include a check for it in my patch. It's possible that's how there are two ModuleCryoTank nodes being applied there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I've got MFT. That must be the issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not totally easy to debug but:

@PART[*]:HAS[@MODULE[ModuleFuelTanks]]:NEEDS[!RealFuels]:FOR[zzz_CryoTanks]

The MFT patch will do this, which will add the Cryo module to all parts that use MFT (of which I assume B9PW is one). This patch operates AFTER the B9PW patch....

@PART[B9_Aero_Wing_Procedural_TypeA,Proceduralwing*]:NEEDS[CryoTanks]

This will have already added a copy of the module. The first patch needs to check for the existence of the cryo module before adding it. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.