Give vernor gimbal, or a smaller sized LFO RCS thrusters

[Jestersage]

Now I know they are suppose to be vernier, but in the end, they are still bipropellent RCS thrusters v-- and we sorely need some that does not stick out so weirdly when placed perpendicular to the surface.

[PositronLance001]

like the linear RCS jets but gimballed?

[Jestersage]

3 hours ago, PositronLance001 said:

like the linear RCS jets but gimballed?

The best, of course, is to make it size of linear RCS AND max 45 degree Gimbals (must keep it LFO of course), but just one of the 2 will suffice.

Edited October 28, 2019 by Jestersage

[SnailsAttack]

why

[Jestersage]

6 hours ago, SnailsAttack said:

why

So one can place LFO RCS thrusters that looks good, without the thrusters sticking out all over the place -- especially for aft/forward-translation LFO RCS.

Of course, if your design philosophy is "I will clip everything in" or I will fly the giant spacestation wheel in one go with no fairing since i have a huge bundle of rockets", then you are right -- there is no point for that.

Edited October 29, 2019 by Jestersage

[PositronLance001]

5 hours ago, SnailsAttack said:

why

Also normally the verniers look like warts (ugly). I think they should look like the linear RCS (barely visible), and have one-direction gimbal.