Jump to content

Chang'e 5 - The attempt to collect samples from the Moon and bring them back to Earth.


pmborg

Recommended Posts

11Es0xe.gif 

EUUn6sE.gif 

more clear footage of how the sample can transfer to reentry module

Sample can requires to travel 630 mm distance from ascender to reentry module. To reduce the length of transfer mechanisms, the whole transfer mechanism  includes two pairs of pawls (gif shows one of them, another one is located between docking mechanism and ascender ) and gears on sample can which formed a ratchet device. It take 4 rounds of push-and-back operation to transfer the sample can into the reentry module in around 10 mins.

Edited by 050644zf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 050644zf said:

Official confirmed that the Ascender had intentionally crashed on around Lan 30°S, Lon 0° at UTC 23:30, Dec 7th.

When I jumped out of an airplane and slowed my descent down with a parachute - we called the impact a 'landing' even though it requires a sort of parkour roll to keep from shattering several bones. 

 

Why then are the Chinese intentionally and officially crashing the ascender? 

Just now, JoeSchmuckatelli said:

 

blockquote widget

Edited by JoeSchmuckatelli
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoeSchmuckatelli said:

Why then are the Chinese intentionally and officially crashing the ascender? 

Like the CE-1 mission, the ascender had done all of its job, so they crashed it to keep the clearance of near Lunar space as they said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 050644zf said:

Like the CE-1 mission, the ascender had done all of its job, so they crashed it to keep the clearance of near Lunar space as they said.

As I understand low moon orbit is pretty self cleaning. 
More likely it was to get seismology on impact. Later Apollo missions crashed the 3rd stages for this reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 050644zf said:

Like the CE-1 mission, the ascender had done all of its job, so they crashed it to keep the clearance of near Lunar space as they said.

Hah - I missed that.  For some reason my muddled first cup of coffee brain thought they'd recovered the sample container and called it the ascender. 

 

Now with sufficient caffeination I realize my humor has been foiled by my own misperception! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JoeSchmuckatelli said:

Hah - I missed that.  For some reason my muddled first cup of coffee brain thought they'd recovered the sample container and called it the ascender. 

 

Now with sufficient caffeination I realize my humor has been foiled by my own misperception! 

you are not alone here :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 050644zf said:

Official confirmed that the Ascender had intentionally crashed on

3 hours ago, magnemoe said:

More likely it was to get seismology on impact.

Is there still a working seismometer up there ? Maybe on one of the earlier landers, if there's one ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, YNM said:

Is there still a working seismometer up there ? Maybe on one of the earlier landers, if there's one ?

The lander has drilled an hole in the moon, not sure if an seismometer is included, or perhaps the lander for the rover on the back side. 
If not they could just kept it there for future tests. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Brotoro said:

Do we know when Chang'e 5 is scheduled to boost back toward Earth?

Hello,

Right now Chang'e 5 is still waiting in Moon orbit for the time-window to do the prograde into Earth direction.

The Burn it will be on Saturday (12/Dez/2020) 21:50 WET, then more 3 days to arrive at Earth Orbit at 5000Km and then it will bouncing off the atmosphere once, and then the final entry.

Edited by pmborg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you.

This  mission certainly has been exciting in the same way the the Apollo moon missions were exciting, with stuff happening quickly (compared to the slow pace of interplanetary missions we are used to nowadays). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/8/2020 at 7:21 AM, JoeSchmuckatelli said:

When I jumped out of an airplane and slowed my descent down with a parachute - we called the impact a 'landing' even though it requires a sort of parkour roll to keep from shattering several bones. 

If you can get up and do it again, it is a *great* landing.  Breaking bones might not be such a good landing, as you wouldn't "walk away from it".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...