Jump to content

Mission To Mars Scifi Challenge


Spacescifi

What are our chances at success?  

3 members have voted

  1. 1. Can We Do It Or Not?

    • Are You Serious?
    • No Way
      0
    • Maybe... That's A Big Maybe
      0
    • I have faith er... trust in my species... I think!
      0
    • Puh-leeze.... We WILL be Overlords Of The Galaxy! Gimme That Tech! Keep those tests comin!


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Spacescifi said:

And Orions still matter here.

Laser induced fusion via portal means you no longer need a fission trigger. No more bombs needed.

 

Just fuel you can zap into fusion blasts to push you along.

In that case you don't need the pusher plate, and then it's no longer Orion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Spacescifi said:

Orion will always be more energetic than a rocket, so it is more efficient at being a torchship.

Orion is very inefficient. It wastes most of the energy it carries.

If we had photon portals, no one would bother with lasers or induced fusion or anything like that. These portals are tungsten, after all, so they should be able to handle very high temperatures with ease. The equilibrium temperature for metal reaches about 1700 degrees C around a million miles from the sun, so a tungsten photon portal should be able to get significantly closer: up to around 730,000 miles from the sun, where the equilibrium temperature is just below tungsten's melting point. 

Insolation there will be 16,000 greater than it is at 1 AU, thanks to the inverse-squared law. Insolation at 1 AU is about 1.4 kilowatts per square meter, so the photon flux through the photon portals will be 19.6 square meters times 1.4 kilowatts per square meters times 16,000 for a total of 440 MW. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kerbiloid said:

Orion is not propelled by booms, it's propelled by direct plasma jets, as it was explained for million times.

It's not enough to throw fuel and burn. It should have something else.

 

In atmosphere the shockwave air blast does give extra boost.

 

In space it is the plasma... which is the inverse of a rocket which throws plasma exhaust.

An Orion smashes itself with plasma to push along, so the fuel pellets are concentrated plasma blasts if high velocity, since the mass is vaporized anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spacescifi said:

In atmosphere the shockwave air blast does give extra boost.

It would give only extra damage.

And anyway the fuel pellets are no concentrated plasma blasts, they are just a source of energy spreading uniformly.

An Orion charge should have a director, it's not just a pellet.

Or the nozzle should form a direct jet from it electromagnetically (Z-pinch MiniMag Orion)

In any case, the AM has nothing to do there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...