How does Starfield compare to KSP2 (ship & base building, environment, IVA, HUD)?
What do you think about the Starfield features revealed by the gameplay videos and photos - as compared to KSP2?
I'm not comparing genres - only "apples to apples", things that KSP also has: ship building features, base building, celestial body environment, ship IVA and third person HUD features.
Also remember: Starfield players cannot actively pilot their ships to a planet's surface
Ship Building (with details here & here):
Base building and resources (detail
We've barely seen kerbin and those views were from very early into the development process, but even if that was the final asset ([almost] no point in making placeholder assets for other systems planets and moons but you need to have at least Kerbin and mun very early if you want to do any testing whatsoever) I'd argue that most palyer are not going to spend much time landing on Kerbin.
Yes, you can play the game however you want, but it's a space game about building rockets to go to other
