Catto Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 On 2/19/2023 at 4:05 AM, GoldForest said: You forgot to add two options: 3) I meet the recommended specs 4) I exceed the recommended specs GPU should be fine. CPU, might be a bottleneck, RAM, might be a bottleneck. 5) I am under the required specs but i can still probably run it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDJ Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 Phht. Nowhere close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutex Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 I meet the recommended specs. Not taking into account any potential performance drop caused by using Proton. But then I probably have bigger things to worry about on that front, like say, if the game starts at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarecrow71 Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 1 hour ago, tg626 said: Assuming systemrequirmentslab.com knows what it's talking about, yes. Video Card Minimum: GeForce GTX 260/Radeon HD 5670 (1 GB VRAM) You have: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Required You have Dedicated Video RAM 1 GB 8.0 GB Pixel Shader 4.0 5.1 Vertex Shader 4.0 5.1 Your graphics driver is over 7 months out-of date Click here for the latest drivers CPU Minimum: Core i5 You have: AMD FX(tm)-6350 Six-Core Processor CPU Speed Minimum: Info You have: 3.9 GHz RAM Minimum: 4 GB You have: 16 GB OS Minimum: Windows 8 or 10 64 bit You have: Windows 10 According to that site, I exceed the recommended requirements. Which means I'll probably spend most of Friday hunting down display bugs and trying to figure out why my FPS is < 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashandalar Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 7 minutes ago, Scarecrow71 said: According to that site, I exceed the recommended requirements. Which means I'll probably spend most of Friday hunting down display bugs and trying to figure out why my FPS is < 1. I'd be surprised if you didn't exceed the requirements, because the ones listed on that site are exceptionally wrong. The GTX 260 is a 15 year old GPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarin Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 "Well above for everything but GPU". So I guess we'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeliriumTrigger Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 (edited) I'm kinda in the middle between minimum and recommended in terms of GPU, but since the gameplay footage I saw shows the game dropping to 20 frames per second when launching a 100 part basic mun rocket on a PC that far exceeds the recommended specs, I'm gonna go ahead and assume that my 2080 isn't going to cut it for my standards of playable. Edited February 20, 2023 by DeliriumTrigger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 I'm good, 6800XT and 5800X, and 32GB of ram, on a 1440p monitor. That's going to be my setup for the next 5 or 6 years. On the other hand I'm really starting to doubt I'm going to manage to make it run on my SteamDeck, but that's not a huge deal, back to PS2 emulation it is, I have an itch for NFS Underground 2 right now I really want to scratch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave1904 Posted February 20, 2023 Share Posted February 20, 2023 3080 and 12900k. I wouldn't really be bothered by specs right now. By the looks of things ksp 2 won't be in a playable state for a while. Im actually really surprised they allowed the YouTubers to release that footage ahead of release. Its honest and not giving players the wrong impression. Id keep my hands of it if you don't have the specs to brute force it. Honestly I doubt the minimum Specs will perform well either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DwightLee Posted February 21, 2023 Share Posted February 21, 2023 mine is at the recommended level Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacksawild Posted February 21, 2023 Share Posted February 21, 2023 I do, Ryzen 9 5900X and 3080TI 12GB with 32GB Ram. I don't believe the GPU requirements are really what they seem, all of the performance problems seemed to be more about the physics than the graphics. I think the reason they were using 4080s is because they were playing and recording in 1440p. I am surpirised the CPU requirements are listed as so low though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOtherDave Posted February 21, 2023 Share Posted February 21, 2023 (edited) “Meets the minimum specs, but is a Mac and I’m not sure I have room for Windows, Steam, and KSP 2” Edited February 21, 2023 by TheOtherDave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOtherDave Posted February 21, 2023 Share Posted February 21, 2023 3 hours ago, DeliriumTrigger said: I'm kinda in the middle between minimum and recommended in terms of GPU, but since the gameplay footage I saw shows the game dropping to 20 frames per second when launching a 100 part basic mun rocket on a PC that far exceeds the recommended specs, I'm gonna go ahead and assume that my 2080 isn't going to cut it for my standards of playable. I’m pretty sure that’s more a CPU thing than GPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tg626 Posted February 21, 2023 Share Posted February 21, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, tg626 said: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8Gb AMD FX(tm)-6350 Six-Core Processor, 3.9GHz, 16Gb So, can I? I have no kerbaling idea. For years now I haven't been able to tell because models of compents long ago abandoned a sequential order that would provide ANY clue... Edited February 21, 2023 by tg626 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tg626 Posted February 21, 2023 Share Posted February 21, 2023 My FX-6350 > minimum AMD Athlon X4 845 My GTX1070 8gb is listed as a minimum req So, maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket Farmer Posted February 21, 2023 Share Posted February 21, 2023 13900, 4090 OC, 64GB DDR5 and a quick hard drive as well. It’s going to be a fun ride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatsEJstandfor Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 On 2/20/2023 at 7:05 AM, Scarecrow71 said: So, I checked my machine this morning to see what I've got going on. I'm a software guy by day, and hardware is a bit beyond my wheelhouse. If someone could tell me if I am ok or not, that'd be keen. Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-core 3.09 GHz RAM: 32 GB Display Adapter: NVidia GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (which I believe is only 8 GB) Anyone? RAM and CPU are more than enough. The 2060 Super is just above the minimum. We have almost identical hardware; I have the same CPU and same amount of RAM, with an RX 5700 (just above the recommended 5600XT). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennyc222 Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 (edited) CPU i7 10700 2.5 GHz RAM: 32GB DDR4 Graphic Card: Nvidia 3060 Using 512GB SSD It works well for Red dead 2, Doom Eternal, Mass Effect legendary, CoD Vanguard, AC Valhalla/Odyssey in ultra-high Graphic up to at least 80 - 100 fps Edited February 23, 2023 by kennyc222 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmanonP Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 32 gigs ddr4 i9 -9900 KF processor AMD Radeon RX 6700XT 12 GB Pretty sure I'm good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts