Post your FPS!(And system specs.)

[KOS-MOS42]

• CPU: Ryzen 5 2600
• GPU: RX 580 8GB
• 16 GB RAM
• Game on a SSD

60 fps in the VAB but heavy stutter when I click on anything.

15-20 fps around the space center whatever the number of parts on my craft. Framerate drops heavily outside of the KSC area.

60 fps in space but drops to 5 whenever a celestial body is in view. Impossible to land on the Mun. Lowering the graphics or the resolution does nothing to performance.

Only playable with a small plane over the water for a few minutes but anything else is a no go.

[Rocket Farmer]

19 hours ago, TomKerbal said:

How comes ? My system is not much slower (1390,RX690XT,32MB 7GHz DDR5), but I have only 10fps at start (small rocket). What graphical settings do you use ? Interesting, perhaps the 64GB ? But due to TaskManager no problem... I don't understand this difference.

So for me 10fps is not the problem, but the missing realtime capability is. And I am curious why the big fps differences. I will try some different rocket designs, perhaps leading to realtime capability and getting 60fps at launch

Update (always using maximum graphics settings) :

FPS with 3 part simple rocket >60fps during launch.  Realtime capable.

With 15parts: >50fps. Realtime capable.

30 parts: >30fps.

 

Depending on the GPU benchmark your 6900XT is somewhere between 40-55% of a stock 4090 (mine is a bit OC’d) so with my 4090 being the bottleneck and running at 100% your 6900XT is going to fair a lot worse.

[TomKerbal]

3 hours ago, Rocket Farmer said:

Depending on the GPU benchmark your 6900XT is somewhere between 40-55% of a stock 4090 (mine is a bit OC’d) so with my 4090 being the bottleneck and running at 100% your 6900XT is going to fair a lot worse.

Ah, o.k., you're right. I take the 55% then :-)

[KerbalOnKerbin]

AMD Ryzen 1700x
Radeon RX 550 (not for long tho)

32GB DDR4

30fps VAB, 5fps Kerbin, 9fps orbit (when looking away from Kerbin), idk for else. All on low settings

[NextinHKRY]

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1660 6GB
RAM: 16GB DDR4 @ 3600mHz

1440p at medium settings runs at an average of 15-20 FPS while looking at Kerbin, and 30-50 when in space/looking at other planets. I don't know if my graphics card is anomalous and suddenly became a beast because I've read that other people weren't even able to run the game at 15fps on a 1660 on 1080 low!

1080p at medium settings it runs at around 30 FPS while looking at Kerbin and 60 in space.

[BobbyDausus]

18 hours ago, Rocket Farmer said:

Depending on the GPU benchmark your 6900XT is somewhere between 40-55% of a stock 4090 (mine is a bit OC’d) so with my 4090 being the bottleneck and running at 100% your 6900XT is going to fair a lot worse.

Holy sheet,the 4090 is twice as strong as the older gen? like 3090 6900XT ? I mean these 6900XT and 3090 should've been blazing through this game at 1000 fps......but then we woke up

[shdwlrd]

Ryzen7 2700X, GTX 1060 6GB, 16 GB RAM, 2TB HDD, Win10.

High settings: 15-20 out in the world; 30-35 in the VAB

Medium-Low settings: 25-35 out in the world; about the same in the VAB. Definitely playable.

Yes, KSP2 still looks a lot better than KSP1 at the same settings. I'm truly surprised that KSP2 looks as good as it does at these settings and has relatively decent performance. 

Cudos to the devs, hoping the performance gets better with more optimizations.

I will test with the other systems I have later.

Edited February 28, 2023 by shdwlrd

[Rocket Farmer]

15 hours ago, BobbyDausus said:

Holy sheet,the 4090 is twice as strong as the older gen? like 3090 6900XT ? I mean these 6900XT and 3090 should've been blazing through this game at 1000 fps......but then we woke up

Twice as strong yes.  Sadly also twice as expensive.

[Moganite]

R5 5600X, 32 GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Win 10, GTX 960 2 GB.

Got it to run. Turned all settings low, turned off props, cleaned out unnecessary TSR programs.

Main menu 100 -130 FPS

KSC 11

VAB 20 to 30

Map view 60-70

Training centre 11 even while watching videos

Launch tower 11

Flying 5 to 10 getting worse until in orbit. looking at kerin is worst.

LKO . 5 looking at Kerbin 20- 30 looking away from Kerbin, same for other celestial bodies.

Getting higher in the orbit the penalty for looking at celestial bodies diminshes and neglible above 15000 km.

Interplanetary space aprox 30.

Haven't tested the runway yet.

[pandaman]

Quad Xeon W3550 @3.07 GHz

24 GB RAM

GTX 1650

1080p (27")

Typically around KSC 1 to 3 FPS max.  Occasionally it gives me 10 to 12 with the same craft for no apparent reason.

In space a very playable 15 to 30 FPS (getting 18 currently over Minmus).

In VAB, 40 FPS is not unusual.

Very pleasantly surprised after my first look and seeing what my initial  FPS was on launching the first few times.

[Bej Kerman]

On 2/24/2023 at 8:58 PM, JoeSchmuckatelli said:

4k

Believe I found the problem

[bobbyroberts99]

• KSP2: 0.1.0.0.20892
• CPU: Ryzen 5 1600x
• GPU: 1660 Super, 6gb ram
• RAM: 16gb ddr4, 2133 mHz
• MOBO: ROG Strix B350
• 1080p
• High settings (default)
  • Does not tax cpu or gpu. Temps are low.
• Flying 44-part ship
• FPS is pretty much always smooth and playable so far (5 hours of play time)
  • FPS is capped at 30
    • Launch: 18-24
    • Space: 27-30

I was hesitant to buy because my rig is below min specs. Although there's a long way to go, the game works well enough to be enjoyable for me. I'm happy to be along for the ride.

 

Edited March 2, 2023 by bobbyroberts99

[Rutabaga22]

• CPU: Intel Core I7-10750H
• GPU: RTX 2060 
• RAM: 16gb
• 1080p
• High settings
  • Temperatures Lower than similar craft in first game
• Flying Kerbal K2
  • On pad ~20 fps
  • Launch ~15fps
    • After SRB separation ~30fps
    • After Dropping stage 1 ~30fps
  •  Orbital ~40fps

My fps is steady and playable.

[shdwlrd]

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 32GB, integrated Radeon GPU  (had to try it)

In VAB: about 20fps

Out in the world: high 8fps; med 12fps; low 18 fps

The funny thing is the CPU never broke 5% and the shared VRAM never exceeded 7gb out of the 16gb allocated for it. So with a modern dedicated GPU, the 5600G would have good performance. 

Again, I had to try it for laughs. I had no real hope it would run good with this setup.

[DePoX]

I just can't... takes me hours to build anything due to the framerate and then it glitches underground so i have to start over again...

9700K, 32GB DDR4, EVGA 3700 8GB VRAM, 1440p and this is what I get?

I really hope the new patch on 12 April will fix at least the FPS in the VAB

5 - 6 FPS with a 90-Part rocket... crazy...

 

[axtpg2i]

CPU:12700     

GPU:3050(8G)

RAM:32G 3600 D4

4K high

8fps~60fps

[Little 908]

After patch 2

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz   4.10 GHz

16.0 GB

RTX 3060

Running on high settings (max)

100 Fps in VAB (no vehicle)

60-70 Fps on launchpad (no vehicle)

70-85 Fps in VAB (vehicle < 100 parts)

25-45 Fps on launchpad (vehicle < 100 parts)

Edited April 14, 2023 by Little 908