I think the Mun needs a new time warp minimum altitude...

[SkyRender]

5KM up is not cutting it any more, as parts of the Mun are now above that height. It's entirely possible for vessels near to the 5KM mark to get removed from the game when on rails now, as just happened for poor Bob Kerman on my latest file. Pity, too; he had the rover with him... Anyway, yeah, time warp allowance adjustment is definitely needed.

[austin4050]

Moved to suggestions and development.

[Sumyunguy]

Yes! I can't tell you how frightened I am of time-warp when landing/flying near the Mun. I've lost so many ships to that rock of dust that such a change would be excellent in my opinion.

[boomerdog2000]

I think with the new craters the altitude has changed quite a bit. ISA mapsat confirms much of the surface is now above 3500m when it wasn't before.

[ravener]

Almost unrelated question time!

What is the highest point on the mun within a degree or two from equator?

I have tried wrapping a network of satelites snugly around the mun, the only problem is i dont know the highest point around equator. The effect of this has been a few spectacular flybys of mountains that i should have been at least a hundred meters above.

[Kimberly]

Almost unrelated question time!

What is the highest point on the mun within a degree or two from equator?

I have tried wrapping a network of satelites snugly around the mun, the only problem is i dont know the highest point around equator. The effect of this has been a few spectacular flybys of mountains that i should have been at least a hundred meters above.

If I recall correctly, it's 5800 meters or so. I'd say 6500 is a comfortable orbiting altitude.