Jump to content

The KSP equation


Captain Sierra

Recommended Posts

So, this is my take on part of what wastes so much of my time, which I turned into a math problem for humor.

Nighttime = sleepiness + free time

ALSO

Sleepiness + caffeine/sugar = ideas

WELL

Free time + ideas = progress made

THEREFORE

Progress made + KSP = flag planted/base complete/station built/SCIENCE!TM done/etc.

Flag planted/base complete/station built/SCIENCE!TM done/etc. + loss of sleep time = time well wasted :cool:

So, what's your KSP equation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rocket + boosters = explosions if no struts

Jeb + anything but explosions = happiness

Therefore jeb + struts = happiness

This is Jeb we are talking about right?

I think the second one would be a little more Jeb-like if it read: Jeb + Explosions + Excitement

Which would inadvertently rewrite the second one to be Jeb - struts = Happiness

:sticktongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LET IT BE THAT:

Progress leads to Success

Explosions are necessary for Progress

Explosions do not yield Science

Success does not result in Explosions

Science = Success

IF Success = Science

AND Explosions ≠ Success

THEN Explosions ≠ Science

IF Science ≠ Explosions

AND Explosions = Progress

AND Progress = Success

AND Success = Science

THEN Explosions = Science

Science = Explosions

AND Explosions ≠ Science

THEREFORE Science ≠ Science

...

I think I just broke my brain

Edited by DArkB0mb3rz22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to annoy people with SSTOs:

Math, eh?

Well here's a favourite equation of mine: θphase=h[1-(r1/2r2+1/2)3/2]

Where θphase is the phase angle for rendezvous, r1 is the radius of the initial lower orbit, and r2 is the radius of the higher target orbit. Assuming that both orbits are circular, and a single Hohmann transfer between them. 'h' is 180 degrees or pi radians, so that everything inside the bracket is unitless, or in terms of halves of a revolution. Note that it is entirely independent of what body you're orbiting, and only depends on the ratio of the radii of the two orbits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...