Jump to content

How much dV and fuel would be needed to ascent from Eve?


Recommended Posts

How much dV and fuel would be needed to ascent from Eve, And Dock with a parent ship to take the ascent vehicle to kerbin orbit.

Then the ascent vehicle would undock do the deorbit burn from kerbin, Decouple from the ascent vehicle and parachute safely down.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From sea level, with a perfect ascent, just barely clearing Eve's atmosphere, you need: 11,582.77 dV

From Eve's highest peak, at 7,526m, with a perfect ascent, just barely clearing Eve's atmosphere, you need: 5,263.15 dV

You aren't going to have a perfect ascent, so I'd recommend bringing more than that. Shoot for a thrust to weight ratio of around 2.0, and make sure you're getting Eve TWR, not Kerbin TWR. The above math just goes to show you how huge the difference is between a surface ascent and an ascent from high altitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Eve's highest peak, at 7,526m, with a perfect ascent, just barely clearing Eve's atmosphere, you need: 5,263.15 dV

.

It's my understanding that mountain got nerfed, and the highest peak isn't quite so high any more. That should also address tavert's point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be better if the remenants of the launch vehicle is left in orbit and return ship docks with the launch vehicle. Otherwise you are trying to lift RCS tanks and monopropellant off Eve which will cost you loads of DeltaV.

If you can dock using just the monopropellant stored in the capsule, there is zero mass/dV penalty. If you're using a command chair it's better to use the mission profile you describe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless KER is lying to me (very possible) the monoprop in the command modules still has mass. It's the bottomless supply of EVA fuel that doesn't.

I've never thought to empty the MP tank in a capsule to save mass, makes sense now that you mention it. Thanks for the tip!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or you could add the RCS thrusters which have no mass (due to the physics significance=1 line in the .cfg file), and use that monoprop for an extra bit of thrust.

I'm not sure at which point in the ascent that it would be most efficient to use up the monoprop. Its ISP sucks, but even more so low in the atmosphere- but considering the "engine" is massless, and you could have decoupled everything and be left with just the 6 ton lander can -> I often use the monoprop plus a pair of RCS as the last stage. If that fails... abandon ship, and jet pack :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...