Jump to content

[1.10.X] Tantares - Stockalike Soyuz and MIR [23.2][01.11.2020]


Recommended Posts

[quote name='Reddragon']Ha! Paaart 31! Nice work on the new (and old) parts as always.[/QUOTE]

Leave a comment on this forum thread if you would like a pizza roll.

But, really, thanks!

[quote name='tjsnh']I hate to be a debbie downer - the latest Vostok is missing vesselType = Ship[/QUOTE]

Fixed, good find!

[quote name='curtquarquesso']Rather large bug, not sure if it's from 31, or 31.1.
Decals on the Hamal orbital modules seem to be visible in the catalog icons. I believe you need to tag these as Icon_Hidden.[/QUOTE]

Will fix :) Thanks!
Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='VenomousRequiem']That gets me like 500 pizza rolls, yo.[/QUOTE]

I'll need payment for postage of course.

[quote name='minepagan']Is AB launchers dead? I don't wanna ask on that thread for risk of it getting locked, but......
is he dead, Jim?[/QUOTE]

It's not dead. Though needs to be updated. I'll get around to it. :)
The mod however is "finished", that I don't think there will be any new parts added (just config changes).
Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Beale']Great!

[SIZE=5]Tantares 31.1[/SIZE]

Better thermal behaviour, thanks Araym and tjsnh!

I've removed the PPTS, I have zero enthusiasm to complete it and has already been done better elsewhere (Contares).
If a person would like to use the models, feel free!

- Hamal_Control_D config fixed.
- Heatshield Behaviour fixed for capsules.
- PPTS removed [B](Craft Breaking).[/B]
- New Thrust FX for Soyuz and LOK engines.
[/QUOTE]

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/DRzahnv.jpg[/IMG]

I use the PPTS capsule for my pseudo-Dragon v2. Please don't remove it. It already has an IVA and not every IVA needs to be an amazing whizbang thing, and iirc, the Contares version's IVA isn't any better. Besides, yours has a light, a KIS config, and it looks awesome! Please keep it in. Edited by Captain Planet
Link to post
Share on other sites
Quick look at the new release 31.1...


TKS: "Spectre" Capsule (Alnair_Crew_C) still need a pass to be modified like all the pods with ablator

Salyut: you added a new Node (MIR_Node_A), but there is still a cfg about a MIR_Node_B (the old one) without any model. Remove the cfg... or add back the old model (I selected the second option, on my end: the more round one fit better 0.625 docking ports)

PPTS: sad about your decision to erase it. It makes a good pod as it was... (Another one moved directly to "my modified directory" to keep it as it is, to be more looking like the Tantares ones, overall)
Contares one are not very different, aside to be just "different" outside, as they are using your own IVA, so they are not "better", just "different" Edited by Araym
Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Araym']Quick look at the new release 31.1...


TKS: "Spectre" Capsule (Alnair_Crew_C) still need a pass to be modified like all the pods with ablator

Salyut: you added a new Node (MIR_Node_A), but there is still a cfg about a MIR_Node_B (the old one) without any model. Remove the cfg... or add back the old model (I selected the second option, on my end: the more round one fit better 0.625 docking ports)

PPTS: sad about your decision to erase it. It makes a good pod as it was... (Another one moved directly to "my modified directory" to keep it as it is, to be more looking like the Tantares ones, overall)
Contares one are not very different, aside to be just "different" outside, as they are using your own IVA, so they are not "better", just "different"[/QUOTE]

If Beale agrees i will take up and continue the PPTS capsule with the matching heatshield in the CONTARES mod.
Right now I need the IVA of PPTS capsule for own capsules.
Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Mods_o_joy']Im missing the small round part with the window on it attached to the side of the Orbital module of the Soyuz[/QUOTE]

You go here: [URL]http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/126817-Early-WIP-Q-Orbital-Systems-Pressurized-modules-docking-parts-and-antennae?p=2042543&viewfull=1#post2042543[/URL]
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Beale!

Nice work - again. Yeah, some fixes needed but you'll make it because you're the best ;) .

Are there some layered templates I can get? I want to repaint the R7 cause I prefer the style on the last to latest version and I'ld like to remove the attention-stripes on the new soyuz. Don't worry - It's just personal favour. Everything else is fantastic. And I'll do it only for personal use.

Would be very kind. Thx!
Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Niemand303']Congrats with the release! :)

I decided to celebrate today's anniversary of the only Buran flight by making a new video featuring Tantares-based Mir-2 :)

[/QUOTE]

Oh wow. I was born that exact day, 27 years ago. Buran flew when I was born!
Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Captain Planet'][URL]http://i.imgur.com/DRzahnv.jpg[/URL]

I use the PPTS capsule for my pseudo-Dragon v2. Please don't remove it. It already has an IVA and not every IVA needs to be an amazing whizbang thing, and iirc, the Contares version's IVA isn't any better. Besides, yours has a light, a KIS config, and it looks awesome! Please keep it in.[/QUOTE]

Do not worry, PPTS is not lost. Starting next weekend PPTS stands as part of the mod CONTARES available again.
Link to post
Share on other sites
[B]PPTS[/B]: Removal is understandable. though now Tantares is without high capacity capsules. Any ideas?

[B]Cygnus[/B]: I've figured out something that's been driving me crazy with the Cygnus Deneb Service module. It's top node isn't exactly 1.875. It's just shy, and leaves a noticeable gap. Took me a while to figure out whether it was the Cygnus PCM, or the service module. I'll be at the Dec. 3rd Cygnus launch hopefully. I'll take pictures. :)

[B]Truss Airlock[/B]: The airlock is nice, but I would hold off perhaps. I don't like the idea of square airlock hatches. Never have. They don't make a lot of sense really. Could you experiment with round hatches, like seen on Pirs and Poisk? I know that PorkJet's updated habitat pack features some round hatches, so it may not be as far off from stock as you think.

What next on your to-do list? Polish, or new stuff? Edited by curtquarquesso
Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='curtquarquesso'][B]PPTS[/B]: Removal is understandable. though now Tantares is without high capacity capsules. Any ideas?

[B]Cygnus[/B]I've figured out something that's been driving me crazy with the Cygnus Deneb Service module. It's top node isn't exactly 1.875. It's just shy, and leaves a noticeable gap. Took me a while to figure out whether it was the Cygnus PCM, or the service module. I'll be at the Dec. 3rd Cygnus launch hopefully. I'll take pictures. :)

[B]Truss Airlock[/B]The airlock is nice, but I would hold off perhaps. I don't like the idea of square airlock hatches. Never have. They don't make a lot of sense really. Could you experiment with round hatches, like seen on Pirs and Poisk? I know that PorkJet's updated habitat pack features some round hatches, so it may not be as far off from stock as you think.

What next on your to-do list? Polish, or new stuff?[/QUOTE]

Hi!

PPTS - a high capacity capsule not sure... Big-G? Could be something a little more useful with an art pass.

Cygnus - sure!

Truss airlock - let's see. I think the new rocket parts will have square hatches, like the plane parts? If not, yeah - redesign. I could design a "tantares hatch" and disregard whatever else enter stock.

What I am working on next? Salyut and TKS, plus finishing the Fuji Edited by Beale
Link to post
Share on other sites
Vega_TrussCrew_A

Still on a single 256x256

[IMG]http://puu.sh/lrBfO/d6a12fb04a.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://puu.sh/lrBgW/3a3b4e2184.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://puu.sh/lrBjH/282f25778c.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://puu.sh/lrBEf/c7522ea4c3.jpg[/IMG] Edited by Beale
Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Beale']Vega_TrussCrew_A

Still on a single 256x256

[URL]http://puu.sh/lrBfO/d6a12fb04a.jpg[/URL]

[URL]http://puu.sh/lrBgW/3a3b4e2184.jpg[/URL]

[URL]http://puu.sh/lrBjH/282f25778c.jpg[/URL]

[URL]http://puu.sh/lrBEf/c7522ea4c3.jpg[/URL][/QUOTE]
Looks nice!
Any chance of a version with the hatch on the side, so you could mount it inline?
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Beale changed the title to [1.10.X] Tantares - Stockalike Soyuz and MIR [23.2][01.11.2020]
  • Snark unpinned this topic
  • Snark pinned this topic
  • Snark locked and unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...