Redhornet919 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 As for Fregat i think it should have reaction wheels but not an actual probe core so it cant be used as an actual probe by itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T'Flok Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 (edited) Best of luck for results with a new cooler As for Fregat, I have tried it for interplanetary mission, in fact deploying a probe towards Ike. The Kerbin ejection was performed by Proton upper stage. Some manouvers and landing by Fregat, not bad performance.http://puu.sh/kGSom/2d9ac954d5.jpgNew SM texture.In the process of stripping it down to basic components, then rebuilding a cleaner, more standard-ized texture (conforms to the style guide).http://puu.sh/kGTNs/300b436b79.jpgThanks. My current temporary cooler from an i5 CPU (my i7's stock cooler kinda broke) isn't very pleasant when you want to wind down with a game that happens to want more than average CPU usage. Turns the sound of my computer into that of a tiny chainsaw, keeps driving me bananas (it's even worse when the CPU usage keeps going from like 60 to 95, agh my sanity and my ears!). Anyway, nice mission to Ike with Fregat! Also I did come up with a few ideas in my mind as to where I'd use that engine. EDIT: Smooth looking new SM texture! Edited October 12, 2015 by T'Flok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBedla Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 New SM texture.Hi Beale. I must say I'm not a fan of the mock-RCS thrusters in the "skirt". Since they don't have a function in KSP and since they don't reflect actual orientation of thrusters (i mean - your shading indicates their direction of thrust is towards the back, maybe at a slight angle, while Soyuz's actual thrusters there are only for pitch/yaw control, and they seem to be angled perpendicularly to the fore-aft axis), I would prefer to keep that part clean so I don't feel a need to cover them somehow...It's a small point in any case, I just felt since you're remaking it (and it does look gorgeous) I would point it out. Not that it would make much difference for me, I rarely have time for KSP, and what little I have would be spent updating new versions of KSP and mods... still come here almost every day to see your awesome work though!Keep it up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legoclone09 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 (edited) Also, is there a docking port that fits in that is 2.5m? I would love that, or a very flat 1.875m to 1.25m adapter. Thanks!EDIT: Fixed typo, needed time to launch the Buran from the Soviet conversion to fix. Edited October 12, 2015 by legoclone09 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopapaka Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 (edited) Nice! The heatshield setup is interesting, I have struggled with delivery of rovers because of this. Thanks......and more......Big Duna mission.Six Kerbals and three biomes. Nice fregat! Edited October 12, 2015 by kopapaka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legoclone09 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 kopapaka, you quoted wrong. There is a space in between the / and quote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hraban Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Hey Beale,i like your fregat. Little bit to clean but very nice modelled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopapaka Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 legoclone09 : thanksReturn and sience Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted October 13, 2015 Author Share Posted October 13, 2015 (edited) As for Fregat i think it should have reaction wheels but not an actual probe core so it cant be used as an actual probe by itself.Interesting idea, I will try this Hi Beale. I must say I'm not a fan of the mock-RCS thrusters in the "skirt". Since they don't have a function in KSP and since they don't reflect actual orientation of thrusters (i mean - your shading indicates their direction of thrust is towards the back, maybe at a slight angle, while Soyuz's actual thrusters there are only for pitch/yaw control, and they seem to be angled perpendicularly to the fore-aft axis), I would prefer to keep that part clean so I don't feel a need to cover them somehow...It's a small point in any case, I just felt since you're remaking it (and it does look gorgeous) I would point it out. Not that it would make much difference for me, I rarely have time for KSP, and what little I have would be spent updating new versions of KSP and mods... still come here almost every day to see your awesome work though!Keep it up!Fair taste yes!I am thinking of replacing them with "caps" or "place-rcs-here" kind of markings.Also, is there a docking port that fits in that is 2.5m? I would love that, or a very flat 1.875m to 1.25m adapter. Thanks!EDIT: Fixed typo, needed time to launch the Buran from the Soviet conversion to fix.Not currently, but they would be nice parts!Thanks......and more......Big Duna mission.Six Kerbals and three biomes. http://img18.rajce.idnes.cz/d1803/11/11509/11509823_4a07bec57533c466448cb56354add4bc/images/Duna_1_1.jpg?ver=0http://img18.rajce.idnes.cz/d1803/11/11509/11509823_4a07bec57533c466448cb56354add4bc/images/Duna_1_2.jpg?ver=0Nice fregat!Nice whole... architecture! I like ascent vehicle!Soyuz changes almost complete.Also Funky Jiuquan Cosmo-Buggy / Soyuz A OM with 0.9375m top node. Edited October 13, 2015 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Augustus_ Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 Shenzhou / Soyuz A OM with 0.9375m top node.http://puu.sh/kJ7HR/290e574f24.jpg Yay, now we can put the Chinese APAS on top of it!Also you spelled Shenzhou wrong, just so you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T'Flok Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 (edited) Soyuz changes almost complete.http://puu.sh/kJ78p/4946b0e9be.jpghttp://puu.sh/kJ7eh/f962804e87.jpgAlso Funky Jiuquan Cosmo-Buggy / Soyuz A OM with 0.9375m top node.http://puu.sh/kJ7HR/290e574f24.jpgShenzhou OM with 0.9375m top node? Awesome, nice one Beale! That part will be put to use on my atomic vessel and other designs that need a bottom exit to surface/space. Now if it only had an IVA as I've run into problems regarding KIS and IVAless areas, I keep loosing my inventory one way or the other (don't know if the problem has been fixed with KIS or not)! Also liking that Soyuz CM is finally stripeless again. A welcome change IMO! Edited October 13, 2015 by T'Flok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted October 13, 2015 Author Share Posted October 13, 2015 Yay, now we can put the Chinese APAS on top of it!Also you spelled Shenzhou wrong, just so you know.Ack!Tricky spelling yes.Shenzhou OM with 0.9375m top node? Awesome' date=' nice one Beale! That part will be put to use on my atomic vessel and other designs that need a bottom exit to surface/space. Now if it only had an IVA as I've run into problems regarding KIS and IVAless areas, I keep loosing my inventory one way or the other (don't know if the problem has been fixed with KIS or not)! Also liking that Soyuz CM is finally stripeless again. A welcome change IMO![/quote']Glad it is enjoyed. On IVAs, I will see to remember this time to restore placeholder IVAs for next release.The stripe is gone yes The stripes is a nice style to go with, but doesn't work unless it goes all the way around, not possible with DM.Here's a few more r e t e x t u r e s.The RCS textures are still present... for now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Augustus_ Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 snipYou might want to add a fuel cell for the LOK, along with a "cupola" for the OM like in real life.Kontact could use some updating, as the real system looks more like 2 magnetic sheets than anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pTrevTrevs Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Oh no, are you going to ruin the smooth and sleek texture of the Soyuz DM with those bright yellow/black stripes?!? They just stand way out from the others and make the DM look ugly. What if you changed it to white stripes, and left gaps between them instead of being alternate colors? I think that may still point out the hatch, but won't stand out too much that it looks ugly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genesis216 Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Hey, can someone tell me about the craft files issue, for me at least it's missing something called almach, what is almach? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VenomousRequiem Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Hey, can someone tell me about the craft files issue, for me at least it's missing something called almach, what is almach?Isn't Almach the old Vostok? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gristle Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Oh no, are you going to ruin the smooth and sleek texture of the Soyuz DM with those bright yellow/black stripes?!? They just stand way out from the others and make the DM look ugly. What if you changed it to white stripes, and left gaps between them instead of being alternate colors? I think that may still point out the hatch, but won't stand out too much that it looks ugly.disagree. I like the hazard stripes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genesis216 Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Isn't Almach the old Vostok?i think so, but this is affecting most of the of craft files. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VenomousRequiem Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 i think so, but this is affecting most of the of craft files.I was thinking maybe the Vostok RCS as a lot of people use them for the RCS jets on various different spacecraft, but the Vostok RCS jets haven't changed in a while, so the same one is still there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genesis216 Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 I was thinking maybe the Vostok RCS as a lot of people use them for the RCS jets on various different spacecraft, but the Vostok RCS jets haven't changed in a while, so the same one is still there.yeah, but what do i do, do i just go back to a previous version and pick it apart (if i do that what should i look for?) or just wait until the craft files are fixed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciaran Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 I have a small request for This mod, Sorry for appearing randomly, But could there be IVA's for all the objects that can support crew? at some point atleast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billbobjebkirk Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 I have a small request for This mod, Sorry for appearing randomly, But could there be IVA's for all the objects that can support crew? at some point atleast.That's a goal, (at leat, it was last time I checked) but making IVAs is a bit of a tedious process. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passinglurker Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 That's a goal, (at leat, it was last time I checked) but making IVAs is a bit of a tedious process.A tedious process with minimal gains most of which are just the convenience of the portrait cam. In the mean time there is an mm patch floating around that adds the placeholder iva to all crewed parts that don't have any iva that'll get you your portrait cam back. (Can't post it myself not near my computer) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Oh no, are you going to ruin the smooth and sleek texture of the Soyuz DM with those bright yellow/black stripes?!? They just stand way out from the others and make the DM look ugly. What if you changed it to white stripes, and left gaps between them instead of being alternate colors? I think that may still point out the hatch, but won't stand out too much that it looks ugly.disagree. I like the hazard stripes.Another vote for the "hazard" stripes. I like them and they are a functional visual cue for locating the hatch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overature Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Is there somewhere that I can download the .craft files for the soyuz and other rockets ive seen in this thread? New to the tantares mod. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.