Beale

[1.7.X] Tantares - Stockalike Soyuz and MIR [18.0][14/07/2019][New LK]

Recommended Posts

On 01/12/2016 at 5:35 AM, Bill the Kerbal said:

All the station parts are missing IVAs, is that mention to happen. 

They're a little too much work to create.

 

@hraban It's almost time for the grid-fins :wink: 

c73PbL7.png
5Ma2MPk.png

Edited by Beale

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Beale said:

@hraban It's almost time for the grid-fins :wink: 

Ok, delivery will be tomorrow. :D

Delivered!

Edited by hraban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Picture of 6x 'N1 Stabilizer' arround a 1.875m Tank.

jhqJNqo.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, hraban said:

Picture of 6x 'N1 Stabilizer' arround a 1.875m Tank.

jhqJNqo.png

Beautiful! You work so fast.

 

 

More Blok-A texture:

BnHb1tD.png
Gi6AX80.png

Edited by Beale

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, hraban said:

Picture of 6x 'N1 Stabilizer' arround a 1.875m Tank.

nice work, @hraban!


hraban.png
Very Fast Hraban Modding At Incredible Hihg Speed (colorized, circa 1939)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Beale said:

They're a little too much work to create.

 

@hraban It's almost time for the grid-fins :wink: 

c73PbL7.png
5Ma2MPk.png

Those three rectangles on each fairing and the base of Blok A are supposed to be faring sep jets, so there's not much of a reason for them to be on Blok A. Obviously they're not hurting anything, but it would make the realisticness better if they weren't there. Great job btw!

Edited by Joeybafoey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, trooperMNG said:

hraban.png
Very Fast Hraban Modding At Incredible Hihg Speed (colorized, circa 1939)

doesn't something need to be in colour to be colourised? :P 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Joeybafoey said:

Those three rectangles on each fairing and the base of Blok A are supposed to be faring sep jets, so there's not much of a reason for them to be on Blok A. Obviously they're not hurting anything, but it would make the realisticness better if they weren't there. Great job btw!

Personally, it's only greeble, no function.

25 minutes ago, MrMeeb said:

doesn't something need to be in colour to be colourised? :P 

qWBCxvY.png

 

 

So close you can smell it.

5Q0PseT.png
ZQOyRIO.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Beale said:

So close you can smell it.

sniff sniff , smells like vodka and borscht

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, MrMeeb said:

doesn't something need to be in colour to be colourised? :P 

it's just a meme bro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Beale said:

Personally, it's only greeble, no function.

qWBCxvY.png

 

 

So close you can smell it.

5Q0PseT.png
ZQOyRIO.png

My body is ready.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, notJebKerman said:

kinda noob question but... is n1 part of tantares or tantares lv?

It would be LV for launch vehicle. Assuming he keeps the same naming structure for new tantares.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

man Imma have so much fun sticking all kinds of things on top of that stack lol

N1 is super reliable for getting my stuff into obit, thanks to that nice, wide thrust base and bottom-heavy areo that keeps it from vert-spins with all but the largest payloads.

 

anyway, @Beale, can we get a breakdown on IVAs? it'd be nice to know what's done and what still needs doing- I know the Spectre capsule is IVA-less, as are most of the orbital parts, and I may go through the hassle of setting them up myself even. I may mostly dabble with MM patches for KSP, but I have done rather more involved projects in other games.

someone else can deal with RPM, but I could likely whip up some spaces using generic props and so on (though I will say in advance that such IVAs may end up having 'extra' seats to accommodate my personal preferences regarding 'how many Kerbals can I reasonably cram in here?'

 

in fact, I may end up fiddling with the Orb modules, since I'd like to add a second seat and some 'equipment-y' stuff like some of the MKII expansion IVAs.

well that and adding internals for the round orbital hab modules (the 'hamal' line) since none of them actually seat Kerbals despite supposedly being habs.

 

and let's not even get into that 2m hab that seats one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Mechtech said:

and let's not even get into that 2m hab that seats one.

Because Salyut could only hold 3....tops.....if its the one I'm thinking of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 05/12/2016 at 5:07 AM, Mechtech said:

anyway, @Beale, can we get a breakdown on IVAs?

I have a comprehensive breakdown of the IVA project below. We're starting with the Salyut and moving forward from there.

It's quite large reading, just beware.

Spoiler

GgocaNK.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Beale said:

GgocaNK.png

While it's certainly not terribly important to me and I understand why you're holding off on them, after all of the part overhauls are done and after the new Tantares (without Vostok and such) is released, will IVAs then become a possibility?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Joeybafoey said:

While it's certainly not terribly important to me and I understand why you're holding off on them, after all of the part overhauls are done and after the new Tantares (without Vostok and such) is released, will IVAs then become a possibility?

No, I literally have no plans for them at all.

I might do an IVA occasionally (See LK lander), but that's it. They should not be expected.

 

More important things:

iuH1WOi.png

Edited by Beale

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 05.12.2016 at 0:11 AM, NeoFatalis said:

sniff sniff , smells like vodka and borscht

So stereotypical... :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Legcutter said:

So stereotypical... :huh:

Well.. technically I'm Russian which should mean that I am allowed?:P

Edited by NeoFatalis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/6/2016 at 3:48 PM, Beale said:

More important things:

~snippers~

@Beale are you going to make an IVA for that engine block?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/7/2016 at 8:14 PM, CobaltWolf said:

@Beale are you going to make an IVA for that engine block?

Yes, no, maybe-so.

we've got the best bread-lords, don't we folks?

Edited by legoclone09

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.