Jump to content

[1.1.2] Kerbin-Side (v1.1.0) & Supplements

AlphaAsh

By AlphaAsh
in KSP1 Mod Releases

 Share

Recommended Posts

AlphaAsh

AlphaAsh

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Still looks like you ran out of memory. Also your mods list is clearly incomplete - I can see EVE busy exceptioning in that log (that's actually normal for EVE).

EDIT - Ahhhh. Access issues. Move your KSP install so Windows isn't putting dumb security restrictions on dlls. That's my next best guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stjimmy149

stjimmy149

Posted
Posted (edited)
Still looks like you ran out of memory. Also your mods list is clearly incomplete - I can see EVE busy exceptioning in that log (that's actually normal for EVE).

EDIT - Ahhhh. Access issues. Move your KSP install so Windows isn't putting dumb security restrictions on dlls. That's my next best guess.

Its seems the crashing is maybe inconsistent, it just crashed randomly when i tried launching at Area 51 when it launched fine a few seconds ago, and i also reverted which worked fine.

Link to the crash output log.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ioiszoxda8ukec2/output_log.txt?dl=0

Edited by stjimmy149
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deimos007

Deimos007

Posted
Posted

Hey AlphaAsh, every time I click on an individual pack to download it, it sends me to a blank page and nothing happens, sometimes I get a message saying this domain just got registered but other than that I cant download the pack I want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sedativechunk

sedativechunk

Posted
Posted

Can I just say, I ran across this mod on Scott Manley's page and... I THINK IT'S AWESOME! It crashed on me once but once I put the game in 64 bit it is running smoother.

I LOVE launching from the polar complex, so fun flying over those super high mountains, almost makes KSP feel like a new game without seeing the same old generic scenery when Kerbin is such a massive place with so many biomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blowfish

blowfish

Posted
Posted
It crashed on me once but once I put the game in 64 bit it is running smoother.

KSP x64 is known to be highly unstable, so I would recommend not using it. Many mods (including this one AFAIK) have dropped support for it as a result of being spammed with help requests that were related to KSP x64's problems rather than the mod's problems.

If you're crashing on the 32 bit version, you're probably out of memory. Consider getting the Active Texture Management mod :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AlphaAsh

AlphaAsh

Posted
  • Author
Posted
If I were to try a launch site from this on KSP .25 what would happen?

Oh and it seems the link for the launch sites is broken. Takes me to some some advertising site.

There's some re-organising going on with my web-space. The links will be fixed today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UnanimousCoward

UnanimousCoward

Posted
Posted
KSP x64 is known to be highly unstable, so I would recommend not using it.

Windows 64-bit is a mess, but Linux 64-bit works just fine. I recently switched over to running KSP on Ubuntu, and I'm very pleased with its performance and stability. Works better than the Windows version ever did for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AlphaAsh

AlphaAsh

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Hey AlphaAsh, every time I click on an individual pack to download it, it sends me to a blank page and nothing happens, sometimes I get a message saying this domain just got registered but other than that I cant download the pack I want.

Links should be working now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eskandare

Eskandare

Posted
Posted
Even still, I can create a base on Laythe! :D

Basically, if you can travel there, you can build a base there; if you can 3d model you can install your own buildings, but you can only launch from Kerbin. I've buit a carrier a couple of ships and new bases. I may make something for Jool, like a flying base of sorts.

- - - Updated - - -

I like both of your ideas.

On the first, the issue there is the numbered runway is used multiple times. In order to have the correct numbers, each runway would need its own texture, and therefore its own model. That's a bit of memory bloatage I don't think would slide with many players.

The second idea is actually going to happen once I finish some features that are WIP for Kerbal Konstructs.

For my runway models I'm using a textured mesh with no collider. I just place the model ever so slightly over the runway and Bob's your uncle. All my new markings are being done that way to save memory. I may just create a bunch of runway meshes from 01 to 36 (compass degrees).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AlphaAsh

AlphaAsh

Posted
  • Author
Posted
... I'm using a textured mesh with no collider. I just place the model ever so slightly over the runway and Bob's your uncle. All my new markings are being done that way to save memory. I may just create a bunch of runway meshes from 01 to 36 (compass degrees).

Now that's clever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gaalidas

Gaalidas

Posted
Posted
Basically, if you can travel there, you can build a base there; if you can 3d model you can install your own buildings, but you can only launch from Kerbin. I've buit a carrier a couple of ships and new bases. I may make something for Jool, like a flying base of sorts.

- - - Updated - - -

For my runway models I'm using a textured mesh with no collider. I just place the model ever so slightly over the runway and Bob's your uncle. All my new markings are being done that way to save memory. I may just create a bunch of runway meshes from 01 to 36 (compass degrees).

Technically.... the correct way of putting it is "you can only launch from a base in the Kerbin SOI" considering my several successful (if slightly cheat-ish) launches from the munar surface. I believe the issues arise only when trying to launch from a non-Kerbin based SOI, like Duna for instance, without using something like the EPL mod. I wouldn't put it past the developers of these mods putting their heads together to come up with a solution, but for the time being you gotta stick to the inside of the original planetary system of Kerbin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eskandare

Eskandare

Posted
Posted
Now that's clever.

:D Ash, if you look at the picture of the base I'm working on, you'll see the runway markings. They are done just in that way. Once I have a location I'll be adding the azimuth to the runway. Also if i make any airfields with parallel runways I'll add L, C, or R for Left, Center or Right. Center is used very infrequently, as there are very few triple parallel runways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AlphaAsh

AlphaAsh

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Has anyone updated the navutil .cfg for the newer bases? No idea how to even approach it personally, or i'd wing it.

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/82785-0-90-Kerbin-Side-v0-41-Go-For-Multi-Launch!?p=1645460&viewfull=1#post1645460

That's the last I've heard. Try the NavUtilities thread, you may have more luck there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blipadouzi

blipadouzi

Posted
Posted
Additionally, for those who want Remote Tech 2 support and too lazy to crash stuff into antennae to get the coordinates, here is my RT2 base station list.


GroundStations
{
	STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc488
		Name = Mission Control
		Latitude = -0.131331503391266
		Longitude = -74.594841003418
		Height = 75
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 7.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
	STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc501
		Name = Tracking Station 2
		Latitude = 78.608117
		Longitude = 147.491623
		Height = 2817.58
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 7.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
	STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc502
		Name = Tracking Station 3
		Latitude = 20.45392
		Longitude = -78.093832
		Height = 3684.54
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 7.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
	STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc503
		Name = Tracking Station 4
		Latitude = 20.986161
		Longitude = -117.304872
		Height = 4204.48
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 7.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
	STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc504
		Name = Tracking Station 5
		Latitude = 14.733632
		Longitude = -127.017657
		Height = 2999.19
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 7.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
	STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc505
		Name = Tracking Station 6
		Latitude = 16.043645
		Longitude = -156.864196
		Height = 4704.55
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 7.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
	STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc506
		Name = Tracking Station 7
		Latitude = 3.329209
		Longitude = -37.145679
		Height = 2230.51
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 7.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc507
		Name = KKVLA
		Latitude = 10.3559
		Longitude = 227.3936
		Height = 430.0
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 10.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc508
		Name = Arakebo
		Latitude = 8.2517
		Longitude = 179.4219
		Height = 430.0
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 25.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
STATION
	{
		Guid = 5105f5a9-d628-41c6-ad4b-21154e8fc509
		Name = Kosmodrome
		Latitude = 0.138
		Longitude = 217.1527
		Height = 430.0
		Body = 1
		Antennas
		{
			ANTENNA
			{
				Omni = 7.5E+07
			}
		}
	}
}

Thanks Eskandare for sharing this. I'm just a little confused as to where to put this. Do I create a new file? Do I paste it into an exiting file? I looked through all of the RT2 & Kerbin-Side files I could find and none seemed to suit this code.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...