What would you want in the next update (0.90)?

[Agost]

Couldn't you?

PART
{
name = nuclearEngine
module = Part
author = NovaSilisko

mesh = model.mu
scale = 1
rescaleFactor = 1

node_stack_top = 0.0, 1.40383, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0
node_stack_bottom = 0.0, -1.731957, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0

// ThermalAnim = overheat

fx_exhaustFlame_blue = 0.0, -1.6, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, running
fx_exhaustLight_blue = 0.0, -1.6, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, running
fx_smokeTrail_light = 0.0, -1.6, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, running

sound_vent_medium = engage
sound_rocket_hard = running
sound_vent_soft = disengage
sound_explosion_low = flameout

TechRequired = nuclearPropulsion
entryCost = 22600
cost = 8700
category = Propulsion
subcategory = 0
title = LV-N Atomic Rocket Motor
manufacturer = Jebediah Kerman's Junkyard and Spaceship Parts Co.
description = Despite the big scary trefoil painted onto the side of this engine, its radioactive exhaust, and tendency to overheat, the LV-N Atomic Rocket Motor is harmless. Mostly.

// attachment rules: stack, srfAttach, allowStack, allowSrfAttach, allowCollision
attachRules = 1,0,1,0,0

mass = 2.25
dragModelType = default
maximum_drag = 0.2
minimum_drag = 0.2
angularDrag = 2
crashTolerance = 12
maxTemp = 4000

// Yes, I know this is wrong. NTRs don't actually burn fuel and oxidizer, but we don't want to jump into making separate tanks for the two yet.

MODULE
{
	name = ModuleEngines
	thrustVectorTransformName = thrustTransform
	exhaustDamage = True
	ignitionThreshold = 0.1
	minThrust = 0
	maxThrust = 60
	heatProduction = 600
	fxOffset = 0, 0, 1.6
	PROPELLANT
	{
		name = LiquidFuel
        	ratio = 1
		DrawGauge = True
	}
	atmosphereCurve
 	{
   	 key = 0 800
  	 key = 1 220
 	}

}

MODULE
{
       name = ModuleJettison
       jettisonName = fairingL
       bottomNodeName = bottom
       isFairing = False
       jettisonedObjectMass = 0.1
       jettisonForce = 1
       jettisonDirection = 1 0 0

}

MODULE
{
       name = ModuleJettison
       jettisonName = fairingR
       bottomNodeName = bottom
       isFairing = False
       jettisonedObjectMass = 0.1
       jettisonForce = 1
       jettisonDirection = -1 0 0

}

MODULE
{
	name = ModuleGimbal
	gimbalTransformName = thrustTransform
	gimbalRange = 1
}

MODULE
{
      name = ModuleAnimateHeat
      ThermalAnim = overheat
}

MODULE
{
	name = ModuleAlternator	
	RESOURCE
	{
		name = ElectricCharge
		rate = 5.0
	}
}
RESOURCE
{
	name = ElectricCharge
	amount = 0
	maxAmount = 0
  	isTweakable = false
	hideFlow = true
}

MODULE
{
	name = ModuleTestSubject

	// nowhere: 0, srf: 1, ocean: 2, atmo: 4, space: 8
	environments = 8

	useStaging = False
	useEvent = True
}
}

There, I did it for you.

EDIT:

Hey, look!

"Yes, I know this is wrong. NTRs don't actually burn fuel and oxidizer, but we don't want to jump into making separate tanks for the two yet."

THIS IS IN THE FILE.

So they are thinking of fixing it.

Like I said, I know that squad knows that it's wrong and they want to change it... the real question is why they haven't done it yet, since there already are LF tanks only

[joost53]

In order of how much i want it.

1. Resources and mining, make our trips to other places more usefull. Maybe let us sell the ores / make parts..

2. Mechanical parts, robot arms on which you can attach parts like docks etc.

3. Permanently destructable ground, when you crash a big rocket you are left with a big crater.

4. Usefull electric engines (but it wouldn't be realistic so it will probably not happen)..

5. Fuel generating (maybe from solar power or nuclear power) Not sure if this would be realistic.

6. A fix for lander legs so they don't sink into the ground or some other weird behavior.

7. Sometimes i'm not able to click on the orbit to make a manoeuvre (very annoying).

8. More tollerance for docking, it has to be very precise now, i don't think that is necessary.

9. Sometimes unable to attach objects using symmetry despite the fact that nothing is in the way. (For example when you attach tanks around another tank, and no mather which one you select there's always only 1 turning green)

10. More multipliers for symetry (Why are you skipping 5 and 7? :S )

11. Sub categories for parts, for the category Propulsion have sub-categories for Tanks and Engines. (maybe even further than that : Tanks > RCS, Solid, Liquid.) I do realise it's kinda hard to sub categorize everything since there are gray area's.

12. The right-click menu's when collecting science are not optimal in my opinion, for example : If you did an EVA report, the button still stays there, that's not necessary right?

Edited December 5, 2014 by joost53

[Frozen_Heart]

What I want in the next update:

SSME to go with the Mk-3 parts.

2.5m Nerva

[Catman2021]

I'm really holding out for Stock Resources honestly. I'm loving everything else in the coming update, but Stock Resources will make bases serve a purpose in game (outside of imagination and for the completion of Fine Print contracts).