Jump to content

ESA's IXV february 11th launch


sgt_flyer

Recommended Posts

Welp, it was a successful splash down. Wonder what they will do next with the data they got.

Well, they said it was for gaining return capabilities from LEO (experiment returns / potentially their own manned spacecrafts - and could pave the way towards reusable first stages for a future rocket concept. (The concept showed a rocket with two twin engines winged methalox boosters around a single engine sustainer (possibly methalox too) with this kind of configuration, maybe for a medium LV (maybe to potentially replace soyuz if it's phased out by russians in favor of angara - once the russians get their new manned spacecraft)

- - - Updated - - -

Replay of the launch -

http://www.esa.int/spaceinvideos/Videos/2015/02/Replay_of_Vega_liftoff_VV04_with_IXV

Edited by sgt_flyer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

mmh, checked out some infos for the handling of the spacecraft after the recuperation :

(sorry, article in french)

http://www.futura-sciences.com/magazines/espace/infos/actu/d/ixv-ixv-mission-reussie-mais-pas-terminee-56917/

but roughly, they are speaking about how they passivate the remaining Hydrazine on board - current techniques use a lot of dilution to neutralize the hydrazine, which takes quite some time (they said it would have taken them 10 days to dilute the stuff to safe levels)

however, they decided to experiment on other ways to neutralize hydrazine, by injecting hydrogen peroxyde (they did not specify the concentration though) to make it react with hydrazine (they have to monitor the pressure / temperatures throughout the operation, done in a closed room)

seems this technique allows them to reach safe levels in 1 day (they give a figure of 1ppm of hydrazine remaining after only 1 day) - with 5 days to finish the whole passivation operation. (hydrazine / hydrogen peroxyde reaction giving off only water and nitrogen.)

as this technique is 'new' they want to check out if it can damage the propulsion system, which will be thoroughly checked after the operation. (as they want to confirm they'll be able to reuse some systems)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mmh wondering - on graphs we can see, ixv's backplate is drilled with holes for those RCS thrusters - now, have they been melted, or covered in somethink like putty prior to the launch, to limit risks of leaks after spalshdown (plus, a coating like that could partially ablate / melt during reentry, taking away some heat from the thrusters - as one of ESA's goals is to know if the capsule is in a partially reusable state (including the RCS system)

That, or what's covering the rcs thrusters is the same gooey white stuff the put inside the ring which served as a connection to avum - (stuff that would have been sprayed by divers to prevent hydrazine leaks after splashdown - and some of the scorched color was just washed away on the goo by seawater

Edited by sgt_flyer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...