windows_x_seven Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 43.Because I can. We can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Umm... windows, did you just post and keep the number the same, or were you trying to move it up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Well, too bad.42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 43 all better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CelticCossack51 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 44. Break the loop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Mr. Anderson.43 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zekes Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 42haha, you guys were so close, and that override XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 hue41 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythbusters844 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 40saturationvalue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 41 zekes- that's the third time it's happened this round! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Third time already? Damn, this round is the best one so far.40And you know what's even better? There could be a mistake somewhere at the beginning that nobody has noticed. It's only about 145 pages if anybody wants to check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 41. Wouldn't it be nice if the mistake put us to, oh... 99 or so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperRedNova Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 42. That would be like... the answer to life the universe and everything! or at least to my hopes and dreams of the positives winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endersmens Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 43I support that dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 41. Wouldn't it be nice if the mistake put us to, oh... 99 or so?That would be hilarious Shame nobody got over 91 this game, so not happening 42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 yeah but!! I think it could be interpreted to mean that my reset to 46 was incorrect. If Fel(?) posted 44, the next correct post would be 45. That was Endersmens. Then I reset a bit later. But if I was wrong, wouldn't that mean that the next correct post would be after the reset and whatever number it was when I reset?Deu, I'll leave it to you to go back and check. If I'm right about this, it means that the correct number would be.... 91?!?If not, 43. If it is 91, then 92. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 yeah but!! I think it could be interpreted to mean that my reset to 46 was incorrect. If Fel(?) posted 44, the next correct post would be 45. That was Endersmens. Then I reset a bit later. But if I was wrong, wouldn't that mean that the next correct post would be after the reset and whatever number it was when I reset?Deu, I'll leave it to you to go back and check. If I'm right about this, it means that the correct number would be.... 91?!?If not, 43. If it is 91, then 92.Nope, that's not how it works. You cannot selectively null only one part of a number sequence and call the rest valid. Whatever gets nulled, everything after that up to the revert gets nulled as well. As per rule #6.The sequence was:Dman: 46Fel: 44 (overriding Dman)Floppster: 42Dharak: 43Cheezburgar: 44Floppster: 43Ethan: 44Endersman: 45 (is this the post you are refering to?)Ethan: 46Prof. Endwalker: 47Endersman: 48Chillin: 47Ethan: 48Endersman: 49Dman: Nulling everything from Floppster (bolded), calling the number 46 validEthan: continuing from 46 with 47And then it was just rising. Well, until Fel reverted to his 44. Point is, Endersman's 45 was nulled by you even before Fel's revert, it cannot possibly be valid now.Oh, and the game goes to 42. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endersmens Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 I'm so confused...did I do something wrong? 43 I think... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 ^ nope, everything is as it should be42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endersmens Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 ok43. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Ok, but wouldn't it be nice anyway? 44. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endersmens Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Uh oh, here we go again. Which is right?is my number 45 or 43? (I'm a positive) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 I am right. They have the same stamp, but mine came second and canceled Deu's, according to rule 6, I think.Just to be clear, can you repost with only 45 so we don't get called for ambiguity?And I did not change the number in this post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 I am right. They have the same stamp, but mine came second and canceled Deu's, according to rule 6, I think.Just to be clear, can you repost with only 45 so we don't get called for ambiguity?And I did not change the number in this post.That would be rule #7, but yes, correct.43 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts