# The Number War: Count to 100 or -100

## Recommended Posts

-24(-) gee I sure wish I could put -100 and be done already.

Just now, DarkOwl57 said:

He did nothing wrong

-23(+)

##### Share on other sites

No no no. @adsii1970 put -23 when there should have been -22. Let's stop this before someone goes back when we have -99.

Edited by DarkOwl57
##### Share on other sites

-22 (-1) based off that positives always win skirmishes

##### Share on other sites

STOP!!!!! Let @Dman979 fix this before it goes too far.

##### Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DarkOwl57 said:

-22 -

3 minutes ago, Frybert said:

-21(+)

-23 (-1)

*Watching who wins current skirmish*

Darkowl, I see nothing wrong with this sequence. Adsii1970 won.

##### Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frybert said:

-21(+)

-23 (-1)

*Watching who wins current skirmish*

they are 1 minute apart, that looks like a skirmish to me, @Deutherius and @Dman979, thoughts?

##### Share on other sites

Last valid post is Frybert's -23.

##### Share on other sites

Aight, carry on I guess.

-23 -

##### Share on other sites

Wait... -24 -

I'M HAVING PROBLEMS CATCHING UP!!!

##### Share on other sites

Just now, Dman979 said:

Last valid post is Frybert's -23.

and I was as fast as a turtle lol

-25 (-1)

-24(+)

-25 -

##### Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Deddly said:

I tell you what, I was going to save this for later but I couldn't help noticing that a lot of people don't like me doing this, so I'm going to jump straight to exhibit C. This post was edited an hour before the next one:

Should make this one the last valid number:

Correct?

Hmm. Come to think of it, how do you know that it wasn't edited after the other post? The precise time stamp is the only way to prove it. But the forums no longer have a timstamp showing more than what day it was posted on. So you have no proof that either of your 'reverts' were actually edited before the next post. Unless you weren't being straight when you said you just recently joined, and you were actually there. I was there, and I remember differently. Please prove that.

##### Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JoseEduardo said:

they are 1 minute apart, that looks like a skirmish to me, @Deutherius and @Dman979, thoughts?

Both posts show 7 minutes ago in your original post, and I was the last poster, yet again, um discredited...

##### Share on other sites

I knew something wasn't right about those reverts...

Oh and -26(-)

##### Share on other sites

Wait... So what number are we at? cause if it's back to -90 I'm going to jump for joy

##### Share on other sites

You can mouse over the timestamp to get precise date and time of posting.

EDIT: Works for edit timestamps as well... Wait a few minutes and mouse over mine.

Edited by Deutherius
##### Share on other sites

Play the game or don't play the game. Nobody enjoys these arguments.

##### Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mycroft said:

Hmm. Come to think of it, how do you know that it wasn't edited after the other post? The precise time stamp is the only way to prove it. But the forums no longer have a timstamp showing more than what day it was posted on. So you have no proof that either of your 'reverts' were actually edited before the next post. Unless you weren't being straight when you said you just recently joined, and you were actually there. I was there, and I remember differently. Please prove that.

actually, if you hover your mouse over the "Edited bla bla bla ago" text it shows when it occurred

##### Share on other sites

Just now, Mycroft said:

Hmm. Come to think of it, how do you know that it wasn't edited after the other post? The precise time stamp is the only way to prove it. But the forums no longer have a timstamp showing more than what day it was posted on. So you have no proof that either of your 'reverts' were actually edited before the next post. Unless you weren't being straight when you said you just recently joined, and you were actually there. I was there, and I remember differently. Please prove that.

Mouse over the timestamp of the edit, and both posts. It's finicky, but it's there.

Both posts show 7 minutes ago in your original post, and I was the last poster, yet again, um discredited...

Not sure what you mean here. Your post was valid, and Frybert's was not. Then Mycroft posted and sent it to -24, and Frybert changed it to -23.

##### Share on other sites

SO WHAT NUMBER ARE WE AT?!?!?

##### Share on other sites

Just now, DarkOwl57 said:

SO WHAT NUMBER ARE WE AT?!?!?

V

3 minutes ago, Mycroft said:

I knew something wasn't right about those reverts...

Oh and -26(-)