Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Pizza oven made pepperoni sentient mutations with mushroom brains and peanuts, caramelized onions and garlic salmon, and Pacific geoduck ——— my addition is a type of clam hence 2 words as its a name. @Kimera Industries i figured it was a glitch given its end of term and busy, its also why i made no changes on that post. We be human, we mitsakes maek. Good it all is. 171104242024
  3. Serious question, what are the easy-to-profit-from ways? Things with lower margins but near guaranteed markets. Long game. Food, shelter, (alcohol, tobacco, and firearms?)
  4. Granted. You don't know who played, though. I wish for this wish not to be granted.
  5. Pizza oven made pepperoni sentient mutations with mushroom brains and peanuts, caramelized onions and garlic salmon, and @AlamoVampire I think he forgot to go to the most recent page when he scrolled to the bottom to see where the current sentence was at.
  6. Show me where I said that finding bugs is the same as fixing bugs. I said that I think that bugs are not a priority to whoever delegates tasks to the QA team. Show me where I made any reference to their workflow. Look @The Aziz, its cool you don't agree with me on most things; echo chambers suck, but could you at least try to understand where I am coming from? Every time I reply to you, it seems that I am having to clarify my point to you because you want to prove me wrong. I'm not here to be "right," I'm here to have a discussion with other individuals who are passionate about KSP and spaceflight in general. The impression I get from you is that you take pleasure in reading how I got something incorrect. Remember buddy, you never learn if you never make a mistake.
  7. Today
  8. I think the missing link is the unexpected commercial success and the Shuttle woes. Basically, at roughly the time you'd have expected a resurgence of government space spending, instead the mamy-named Russian space industry first began to scoop up commercial space launches, and then it got the biggest one of all - the Soyuz seat-sharing agreement with NASA. I think at this point a dubious decision was made to wean it off into a commercial venture, despite little evidence that it would be sustainable, which was promptly exemplified in the pre-Rogozin disaster spree. Premature attempts to monetize something are not an uncommon problem, and politically it's rather difficult to fish not for a one-time bailout, but a near-permanent garden hose of money.
  9. Yeah it's not really readable However I have this little browser plugin that allows me to reverse search any picture I click on - and through it I can in fact open the large picture. It's those
  10. Two more days till we get some information… fingers crossed
  11. @QuiescentRabbitt We initially kept your report thread separate from this bug report due to wanting to catalogue how this bug may have changed post-0.2.0.0, however we've seen no significant change in it, as such we've merged it into this report thread
  12. My question would be if this is lack of resources rather than lack of interest in space. Part of the reasons the Soviets were underfunded is because the CPSU had economic issues and the task of building up the nuclear arsenal on their hands. There probably wasn’t money to afford fully funding everything even if they wanted to. Is it the same in Russia? Apart from the obvious “if we spent a fraction of what we do on military on space we’d be on Mars by now” that can apply to all of the big three (US/RU/CHN).
  13. @Beale I was wondering if you would be able to update the description to go with my new username (well not new anymore but you get the idea)
  14. There's a large gap between finding bugs and fixing them. A bug found, reproduced, recorded and reported is not sent to a dev with "fix now pls" note attached to it. How dare they have an organized workflow smh
  15. "QA Testing vs. Playtesting" Whatever its called, it is blindingly obvious that only very specific things are being tested/fixed. My guess is that the QA team knows all about the issues in KSP2, but they gotta do what their bosses tell them to do, and their bosses have a different priority. I know that people on the QA team revert to launch a few times and see their craft get borked. I know they paused the game with a plane onscreen for a few minutes and watched the wheels slowly float away. I know they add more Dv than the game says they need because the game is wrong. I know they are getting good at maneuvering without maneuver nodes or orbit lines. I could go on. Ask any KSP Youtuber about their experience. Here is Matt Lowne's: https://twitter.com/Matt_Lowne/status/1779599922628636991
  16. Hi can you send me the mod save data folder. its at "C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\Kerbal Space Program 2\ModSaveData"
  17. Never said I did. I'm just waiting to see whether they fulfill they're promise. I'm not giving them a free pass but I'm trying to be more patient. You don't have to give them time but I will. If they didn't tell us then how do you know that they are scrapped? News this week. And nothing I have said is untrue either. I am not ignoring facts. I am simply seeing the facts at a different angle and presenting them in a different way that isn't so pessimistic. The issue in my opinion is that everyone thinks that their angle is the right one and that any other thing is some delusion based on untrue thoughts or facts. And that's not just true in the KSP community. It's true in a lot of different places. But everyone has their own opinion and a different way to look at what is presented to us. There are no wrong outlooks. I see what you are saying and I do not personally agree. There is nothing really to "see". Everything and anything that we all say are just opinions and outlooks based on past occurrences. If you personally know the inner workings of Intercept and can give me conclusive proof that we definitely will never get better communication or a more stable game then I will completely back track on everything I have ever said defending the game.
  18. @adsii1970 uh?? I thought we were on: Pizza oven made pepperoni sentient mutations with mushroom brains and peanuts, caramelized onions and garlic salmon ?? 151204242024 new page at 151304242024 wheeee
  19. Then yeah, EA state makes sense. Understanding and continuing development the code of other people is a lot harder than writing it yourself from scratch... In most cases.
  20. A transmission is a brilliant idea! I think there is a happy medium between the current wheels that seem more at home racing around the runways at KSC and the "rock climbing" style wheels Regex would like.
  21. More than covid, there was the studio change, which might have "shamble" things, and that's probably an euphemism. Only 50% of people made it through and I believe little to no engineers made the change.
  22. Nice... would an optional ksa iva be possible for this?
  23. We promise the game will drop in 2020. Oh, sorry, we meant 2021. Oh, darn it all, we have to delay again. Hey, we're gonna drop patches every 6-8 weeks. Oh, you mean we're already at 3 months with no word of when we'll deliver? Hey, you'll get a KERB every 2 weeks. Oh, we meant every month. On second thought, how about once in a given month. Well, Mike has to update his internal calendar, so we'll start whenever he finishes that even though it's been 6 weeks since the last one dropped. We're going to do AMA's every month. Oh, well, we meant every once in a while. Hang on, we'll just scrap those without telling you. We aren't going to make science just a rehash of what we had in KSP1. Oh, what we meant was that we are going to take exactly what science was in KSP1 and just dumb it down. That enough promises for you that they've made and broken? Or do none of those count? Are you just simply ignoring everything about the KERB? They promised every 2 weeks. Then when they couldn't hit that, they changed their minds and promised every month. Then when a month went by and they were asked about it, they changed their minds again and said Mike had to update his internal calendar, and that they truly meant once in a given month. It's now been 6 weeks, and we have no word on what the heck is going on or when we'll get the next one. So no, they honestly haven't upheld the promises they've made about the communication they insisted they were going to give us. And on this topic, let's also not forget that after the initially promised every 2 weeks, they still failed to hit that target. Go check Discord and you'll see a bunch of instances where they said "No KERB Friday; delayed until Monday". And how much time are we supposed to give them beyond the 6 years we've taken to get to this point? How long after them telling us "Monthly" are we supposed to wait until we say "You know, it's been x months and we still haven't gotten one"? Why on earth do you want to give these guys a free pass for not giving us the communication they promised they would? It's the same story over and over: they promise us more communication, they give us less, we ask about it, rinse and repeat. If you can't see that, then nothing I say will change your mind. The side you've presented is one of ignoring facts. Nothing I've said is untrue; you simply need only look throughout the forums to see everything I've stated.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...